Cargando…
Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers
BACKGROUND: The workplace is a setting where sedentary behaviour is highly prevalent. Accurately measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour is crucial to assess the impact of behavioural change interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and criterion validity of the Occupat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-762 |
_version_ | 1782330685411819520 |
---|---|
author | Jancey, Jonine Tye, Marian McGann, Sarah Blackford, Krysten Lee, Andy H |
author_facet | Jancey, Jonine Tye, Marian McGann, Sarah Blackford, Krysten Lee, Andy H |
author_sort | Jancey, Jonine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The workplace is a setting where sedentary behaviour is highly prevalent. Accurately measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour is crucial to assess the impact of behavioural change interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and criterion validity of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) and compare with data collected by accelerometers. METHODS: A test-retest study was undertaken on 99 participants using the OSPAQ. Data were then compared to accelerometer records of 41 participants. Reliability was assessed by paired t-test and intra-class correlations (ICC) via a two-way mixed model based on absolute agreement. Difference and agreement were measured by comparison of mean self-reported data with accelerometer data using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The ICCs for minutes spent sitting (0.66), standing (0.83) and walking (0.77) showed moderate to strong test-retest reliability. No significant differences were found between the repeated measurements taken seven days apart. Correlations with the accelerometer readings were moderate. The Bland-Altman plots showed moderate agreement for standing time and walking time but systematic variation for sedentary time. CONCLUSION: The OSPAQ appears to have acceptable reliability and validity measurement properties for application in the office workplace setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4132919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41329192014-08-15 Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers Jancey, Jonine Tye, Marian McGann, Sarah Blackford, Krysten Lee, Andy H BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The workplace is a setting where sedentary behaviour is highly prevalent. Accurately measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour is crucial to assess the impact of behavioural change interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and criterion validity of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) and compare with data collected by accelerometers. METHODS: A test-retest study was undertaken on 99 participants using the OSPAQ. Data were then compared to accelerometer records of 41 participants. Reliability was assessed by paired t-test and intra-class correlations (ICC) via a two-way mixed model based on absolute agreement. Difference and agreement were measured by comparison of mean self-reported data with accelerometer data using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The ICCs for minutes spent sitting (0.66), standing (0.83) and walking (0.77) showed moderate to strong test-retest reliability. No significant differences were found between the repeated measurements taken seven days apart. Correlations with the accelerometer readings were moderate. The Bland-Altman plots showed moderate agreement for standing time and walking time but systematic variation for sedentary time. CONCLUSION: The OSPAQ appears to have acceptable reliability and validity measurement properties for application in the office workplace setting. BioMed Central 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4132919/ /pubmed/25069528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-762 Text en © Jancey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jancey, Jonine Tye, Marian McGann, Sarah Blackford, Krysten Lee, Andy H Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers |
title | Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers |
title_full | Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers |
title_fullStr | Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers |
title_short | Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers |
title_sort | application of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (ospaq) to office based workers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-762 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janceyjonine applicationoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqtoofficebasedworkers AT tyemarian applicationoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqtoofficebasedworkers AT mcgannsarah applicationoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqtoofficebasedworkers AT blackfordkrysten applicationoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqtoofficebasedworkers AT leeandyh applicationoftheoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireospaqtoofficebasedworkers |