Cargando…

The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye

BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction is becoming a daily tool for plant breeders. It makes use of genotypic information to make predictions used for selection decisions. The accuracy of the predictions depends on the number of genotypes used in the calibration; hence, there is a need of combining data acr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernal-Vasquez, Angela-Maria, Möhring, Jens, Schmidt, Malthe, Schönleben, Manfred, Schön, Chris-Carolin, Piepho, Hans-Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25087599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-646
_version_ 1782330715795357696
author Bernal-Vasquez, Angela-Maria
Möhring, Jens
Schmidt, Malthe
Schönleben, Manfred
Schön, Chris-Carolin
Piepho, Hans-Peter
author_facet Bernal-Vasquez, Angela-Maria
Möhring, Jens
Schmidt, Malthe
Schönleben, Manfred
Schön, Chris-Carolin
Piepho, Hans-Peter
author_sort Bernal-Vasquez, Angela-Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction is becoming a daily tool for plant breeders. It makes use of genotypic information to make predictions used for selection decisions. The accuracy of the predictions depends on the number of genotypes used in the calibration; hence, there is a need of combining data across years. A proper phenotypic analysis is a crucial prerequisite for accurate calibration of genomic prediction procedures. We compared stage-wise approaches to analyse a real dataset of a multi-environment trial (MET) in rye, which was connected between years only through one check, and used different spatial models to obtain better estimates, and thus, improved predictive abilities for genomic prediction. The aims of this study were to assess the advantage of using spatial models for the predictive abilities of genomic prediction, to identify suitable procedures to analyse a MET weakly connected across years using different stage-wise approaches, and to explore genomic prediction as a tool for selection of models for phenotypic data analysis. RESULTS: Using complex spatial models did not significantly improve the predictive ability of genomic prediction, but using row and column effects yielded the highest predictive abilities of all models. In the case of MET poorly connected between years, analysing each year separately and fitting year as a fixed effect in the genomic prediction stage yielded the most realistic predictive abilities. Predictive abilities can also be used to select models for phenotypic data analysis. The trend of the predictive abilities was not the same as the traditionally used Akaike information criterion, but favoured in the end the same models. CONCLUSIONS: Making predictions using weakly linked datasets is of utmost interest for plant breeders. We provide an example with suggestions on how to handle such cases. Rather than relying on checks we show how to use year means across all entries for integrating data across years. It is further shown that fitting of row and column effects captures most of the heterogeneity in the field trials analysed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-646) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4133075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41330752014-08-18 The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye Bernal-Vasquez, Angela-Maria Möhring, Jens Schmidt, Malthe Schönleben, Manfred Schön, Chris-Carolin Piepho, Hans-Peter BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction is becoming a daily tool for plant breeders. It makes use of genotypic information to make predictions used for selection decisions. The accuracy of the predictions depends on the number of genotypes used in the calibration; hence, there is a need of combining data across years. A proper phenotypic analysis is a crucial prerequisite for accurate calibration of genomic prediction procedures. We compared stage-wise approaches to analyse a real dataset of a multi-environment trial (MET) in rye, which was connected between years only through one check, and used different spatial models to obtain better estimates, and thus, improved predictive abilities for genomic prediction. The aims of this study were to assess the advantage of using spatial models for the predictive abilities of genomic prediction, to identify suitable procedures to analyse a MET weakly connected across years using different stage-wise approaches, and to explore genomic prediction as a tool for selection of models for phenotypic data analysis. RESULTS: Using complex spatial models did not significantly improve the predictive ability of genomic prediction, but using row and column effects yielded the highest predictive abilities of all models. In the case of MET poorly connected between years, analysing each year separately and fitting year as a fixed effect in the genomic prediction stage yielded the most realistic predictive abilities. Predictive abilities can also be used to select models for phenotypic data analysis. The trend of the predictive abilities was not the same as the traditionally used Akaike information criterion, but favoured in the end the same models. CONCLUSIONS: Making predictions using weakly linked datasets is of utmost interest for plant breeders. We provide an example with suggestions on how to handle such cases. Rather than relying on checks we show how to use year means across all entries for integrating data across years. It is further shown that fitting of row and column effects captures most of the heterogeneity in the field trials analysed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-646) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4133075/ /pubmed/25087599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-646 Text en © Bernal-Vasquez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bernal-Vasquez, Angela-Maria
Möhring, Jens
Schmidt, Malthe
Schönleben, Manfred
Schön, Chris-Carolin
Piepho, Hans-Peter
The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye
title The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye
title_full The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye
title_fullStr The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye
title_full_unstemmed The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye
title_short The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye
title_sort importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25087599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-646
work_keys_str_mv AT bernalvasquezangelamaria theimportanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT mohringjens theimportanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT schmidtmalthe theimportanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT schonlebenmanfred theimportanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT schonchriscarolin theimportanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT piephohanspeter theimportanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT bernalvasquezangelamaria importanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT mohringjens importanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT schmidtmalthe importanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT schonlebenmanfred importanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT schonchriscarolin importanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye
AT piephohanspeter importanceofphenotypicdataanalysisforgenomicpredictionacasestudycomparingdifferentspatialmodelsinrye