Cargando…
Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?
Biases are commonly seen in numerical cognition. The operational momentum (OM) effect shows that responses to addition and subtraction problems are biased in the whole-number direction of the operation. It is not known if this bias exists for other arithmetic operations. To determine whether OM exis...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104777 |
_version_ | 1782330736012951552 |
---|---|
author | Katz, Curren Knops, André |
author_facet | Katz, Curren Knops, André |
author_sort | Katz, Curren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biases are commonly seen in numerical cognition. The operational momentum (OM) effect shows that responses to addition and subtraction problems are biased in the whole-number direction of the operation. It is not known if this bias exists for other arithmetic operations. To determine whether OM exists in scalar operations, we measured response bias in adults performing symbolic (Arabic digits) and non-symbolic (dots) multiplication and division problems. After seeing two operands, with either a multiplication (×) or division (÷) sign, participants chose among five response choices. Both non-random performance profiles and the significant contribution of both operands in a multiple regression analysis predicting the chosen values, suggest that adults were able to use numerical information to approximate the outcomes in both notations, though they were more accurate on symbolic problems. Performance on non-symbolic problems was influenced by the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives. Reminiscent of the bias in addition and subtraction, we found a significant response bias for non-symbolic problems. Non-symbolic multiplication problems were overestimated and division problems were underestimated. These results indicate that operational momentum is present in non-symbolic multiplication and division. Given the influence of the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives, an interaction between heuristic bias and approximate calculation is possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4133241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41332412014-08-19 Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? Katz, Curren Knops, André PLoS One Research Article Biases are commonly seen in numerical cognition. The operational momentum (OM) effect shows that responses to addition and subtraction problems are biased in the whole-number direction of the operation. It is not known if this bias exists for other arithmetic operations. To determine whether OM exists in scalar operations, we measured response bias in adults performing symbolic (Arabic digits) and non-symbolic (dots) multiplication and division problems. After seeing two operands, with either a multiplication (×) or division (÷) sign, participants chose among five response choices. Both non-random performance profiles and the significant contribution of both operands in a multiple regression analysis predicting the chosen values, suggest that adults were able to use numerical information to approximate the outcomes in both notations, though they were more accurate on symbolic problems. Performance on non-symbolic problems was influenced by the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives. Reminiscent of the bias in addition and subtraction, we found a significant response bias for non-symbolic problems. Non-symbolic multiplication problems were overestimated and division problems were underestimated. These results indicate that operational momentum is present in non-symbolic multiplication and division. Given the influence of the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives, an interaction between heuristic bias and approximate calculation is possible. Public Library of Science 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4133241/ /pubmed/25121951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104777 Text en © 2014 Katz, Knops http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Katz, Curren Knops, André Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? |
title | Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? |
title_full | Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? |
title_fullStr | Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? |
title_full_unstemmed | Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? |
title_short | Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? |
title_sort | operational momentum in multiplication and division? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katzcurren operationalmomentuminmultiplicationanddivision AT knopsandre operationalmomentuminmultiplicationanddivision |