Cargando…

Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?

Biases are commonly seen in numerical cognition. The operational momentum (OM) effect shows that responses to addition and subtraction problems are biased in the whole-number direction of the operation. It is not known if this bias exists for other arithmetic operations. To determine whether OM exis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katz, Curren, Knops, André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104777
_version_ 1782330736012951552
author Katz, Curren
Knops, André
author_facet Katz, Curren
Knops, André
author_sort Katz, Curren
collection PubMed
description Biases are commonly seen in numerical cognition. The operational momentum (OM) effect shows that responses to addition and subtraction problems are biased in the whole-number direction of the operation. It is not known if this bias exists for other arithmetic operations. To determine whether OM exists in scalar operations, we measured response bias in adults performing symbolic (Arabic digits) and non-symbolic (dots) multiplication and division problems. After seeing two operands, with either a multiplication (×) or division (÷) sign, participants chose among five response choices. Both non-random performance profiles and the significant contribution of both operands in a multiple regression analysis predicting the chosen values, suggest that adults were able to use numerical information to approximate the outcomes in both notations, though they were more accurate on symbolic problems. Performance on non-symbolic problems was influenced by the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives. Reminiscent of the bias in addition and subtraction, we found a significant response bias for non-symbolic problems. Non-symbolic multiplication problems were overestimated and division problems were underestimated. These results indicate that operational momentum is present in non-symbolic multiplication and division. Given the influence of the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives, an interaction between heuristic bias and approximate calculation is possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4133241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41332412014-08-19 Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division? Katz, Curren Knops, André PLoS One Research Article Biases are commonly seen in numerical cognition. The operational momentum (OM) effect shows that responses to addition and subtraction problems are biased in the whole-number direction of the operation. It is not known if this bias exists for other arithmetic operations. To determine whether OM exists in scalar operations, we measured response bias in adults performing symbolic (Arabic digits) and non-symbolic (dots) multiplication and division problems. After seeing two operands, with either a multiplication (×) or division (÷) sign, participants chose among five response choices. Both non-random performance profiles and the significant contribution of both operands in a multiple regression analysis predicting the chosen values, suggest that adults were able to use numerical information to approximate the outcomes in both notations, though they were more accurate on symbolic problems. Performance on non-symbolic problems was influenced by the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives. Reminiscent of the bias in addition and subtraction, we found a significant response bias for non-symbolic problems. Non-symbolic multiplication problems were overestimated and division problems were underestimated. These results indicate that operational momentum is present in non-symbolic multiplication and division. Given the influence of the size of the correct choice relative to alternatives, an interaction between heuristic bias and approximate calculation is possible. Public Library of Science 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4133241/ /pubmed/25121951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104777 Text en © 2014 Katz, Knops http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Katz, Curren
Knops, André
Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?
title Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?
title_full Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?
title_fullStr Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?
title_full_unstemmed Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?
title_short Operational Momentum in Multiplication and Division?
title_sort operational momentum in multiplication and division?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104777
work_keys_str_mv AT katzcurren operationalmomentuminmultiplicationanddivision
AT knopsandre operationalmomentuminmultiplicationanddivision