Cargando…

Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton

A standard conservation strategy for plant genetic resources integrates in situ (on-farm or wild) and ex situ (gene or field bank) approaches. Gene bank managers collect ex situ accessions that represent a comprehensive snap shot of the genetic diversity of in situ populations at a given time and pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greene, Stephanie L., Kisha, Theodore J., Yu, Long-Xi, Parra-Quijano, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105145
_version_ 1782330745971277824
author Greene, Stephanie L.
Kisha, Theodore J.
Yu, Long-Xi
Parra-Quijano, Mauricio
author_facet Greene, Stephanie L.
Kisha, Theodore J.
Yu, Long-Xi
Parra-Quijano, Mauricio
author_sort Greene, Stephanie L.
collection PubMed
description A standard conservation strategy for plant genetic resources integrates in situ (on-farm or wild) and ex situ (gene or field bank) approaches. Gene bank managers collect ex situ accessions that represent a comprehensive snap shot of the genetic diversity of in situ populations at a given time and place. Although simple in theory, achieving complementary in situ and ex situ holdings is challenging. Using Trifolium thompsonii as a model insect-pollinated herbaceous perennial species, we used AFLP markers to compare genetic diversity and structure of ex situ accessions collected at two time periods (1995, 2004) from four locations, with their corresponding in situ populations sampled in 2009. Our goal was to assess the complementarity of the two approaches. We examined how gene flow, selection and genetic drift contributed to population change. Across locations, we found no difference in diversity between ex situ and in situ samples. One population showed a decline in genetic diversity over the 15 years studied. Population genetic differentiation among the four locations was significant, but weak. Association tests suggested infrequent, long distance gene flow. Selection and drift occurred, but differences due to spatial effects were three times as strong as differences attributed to temporal effects, and suggested recollection efforts could occur at intervals greater than fifteen years. An effective collecting strategy for insect pollinated herbaceous perennial species was to sample >150 plants, equalize maternal contribution, and sample along random transects with sufficient space between plants to minimize intrafamilial sampling. Quantifying genetic change between ex situ and in situ accessions allows genetic resource managers to validate ex situ collecting and maintenance protocols, develop appropriate recollection intervals, and provide an early detection mechanism for identifying problematic conditions that can be addressed to prevent further decline in vulnerable in situ populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4133347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41333472014-08-19 Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton Greene, Stephanie L. Kisha, Theodore J. Yu, Long-Xi Parra-Quijano, Mauricio PLoS One Research Article A standard conservation strategy for plant genetic resources integrates in situ (on-farm or wild) and ex situ (gene or field bank) approaches. Gene bank managers collect ex situ accessions that represent a comprehensive snap shot of the genetic diversity of in situ populations at a given time and place. Although simple in theory, achieving complementary in situ and ex situ holdings is challenging. Using Trifolium thompsonii as a model insect-pollinated herbaceous perennial species, we used AFLP markers to compare genetic diversity and structure of ex situ accessions collected at two time periods (1995, 2004) from four locations, with their corresponding in situ populations sampled in 2009. Our goal was to assess the complementarity of the two approaches. We examined how gene flow, selection and genetic drift contributed to population change. Across locations, we found no difference in diversity between ex situ and in situ samples. One population showed a decline in genetic diversity over the 15 years studied. Population genetic differentiation among the four locations was significant, but weak. Association tests suggested infrequent, long distance gene flow. Selection and drift occurred, but differences due to spatial effects were three times as strong as differences attributed to temporal effects, and suggested recollection efforts could occur at intervals greater than fifteen years. An effective collecting strategy for insect pollinated herbaceous perennial species was to sample >150 plants, equalize maternal contribution, and sample along random transects with sufficient space between plants to minimize intrafamilial sampling. Quantifying genetic change between ex situ and in situ accessions allows genetic resource managers to validate ex situ collecting and maintenance protocols, develop appropriate recollection intervals, and provide an early detection mechanism for identifying problematic conditions that can be addressed to prevent further decline in vulnerable in situ populations. Public Library of Science 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4133347/ /pubmed/25121602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105145 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Greene, Stephanie L.
Kisha, Theodore J.
Yu, Long-Xi
Parra-Quijano, Mauricio
Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton
title Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton
title_full Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton
title_fullStr Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton
title_full_unstemmed Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton
title_short Conserving Plants in Gene Banks and Nature: Investigating Complementarity with Trifolium thompsonii Morton
title_sort conserving plants in gene banks and nature: investigating complementarity with trifolium thompsonii morton
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105145
work_keys_str_mv AT greenestephaniel conservingplantsingenebanksandnatureinvestigatingcomplementaritywithtrifoliumthompsoniimorton
AT kishatheodorej conservingplantsingenebanksandnatureinvestigatingcomplementaritywithtrifoliumthompsoniimorton
AT yulongxi conservingplantsingenebanksandnatureinvestigatingcomplementaritywithtrifoliumthompsoniimorton
AT parraquijanomauricio conservingplantsingenebanksandnatureinvestigatingcomplementaritywithtrifoliumthompsoniimorton