Cargando…
A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the world. Evidence indicates that behaviours such as tobacco use can influence social networks, and that social network structures can influence behaviours. Social network analysis provides a set of analytic tools to undertake...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25108616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-85 |
_version_ | 1782330829315244032 |
---|---|
author | Maddox, Raglan Davey, Rachel Lovett, Ray van der Sterren, Anke Corbett, Joan Cochrane, Tom |
author_facet | Maddox, Raglan Davey, Rachel Lovett, Ray van der Sterren, Anke Corbett, Joan Cochrane, Tom |
author_sort | Maddox, Raglan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the world. Evidence indicates that behaviours such as tobacco use can influence social networks, and that social network structures can influence behaviours. Social network analysis provides a set of analytic tools to undertake methodical analysis of social networks. We will undertake a systematic review to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the literature regarding social network analysis and tobacco use. The review will answer the following research questions: among participants who use tobacco, does social network structure/position influence tobacco use? Does tobacco use influence peer selection? Does peer selection influence tobacco use? METHODS: We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and search the following databases for relevant articles: CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature); Informit Health Collection; PsycINFO; PubMed/MEDLINE; Scopus/Embase; Web of Science; and the Wiley Online Library. Keywords include tobacco; smoking; smokeless; cigarettes; cigar and ‘social network’ and reference lists of included articles will be hand searched. Studies will be included that provide descriptions of social network analysis of tobacco use. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method data that meets the inclusion criteria for the review, including methodological rigour, credibility and quality standards, will be synthesized using narrative synthesis. Results will be presented using outcome statistics that address each of the research questions. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide a timely evidence base on the role of social network analysis of tobacco use, forming a basis for future research, policy and practice in this area. This systematic review will synthesise the evidence, supporting the hypothesis that social network structures can influence tobacco use. This will also include exploring the relationship between social network structure, social network position, peer selection, peer influence and tobacco use across all age groups, and across different demographics. The research will increase our understanding of social networks and their impact on tobacco use, informing policy and practice while highlighting gaps in the literature and areas for further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4134108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41341082014-08-16 A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use Maddox, Raglan Davey, Rachel Lovett, Ray van der Sterren, Anke Corbett, Joan Cochrane, Tom Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the world. Evidence indicates that behaviours such as tobacco use can influence social networks, and that social network structures can influence behaviours. Social network analysis provides a set of analytic tools to undertake methodical analysis of social networks. We will undertake a systematic review to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the literature regarding social network analysis and tobacco use. The review will answer the following research questions: among participants who use tobacco, does social network structure/position influence tobacco use? Does tobacco use influence peer selection? Does peer selection influence tobacco use? METHODS: We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and search the following databases for relevant articles: CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature); Informit Health Collection; PsycINFO; PubMed/MEDLINE; Scopus/Embase; Web of Science; and the Wiley Online Library. Keywords include tobacco; smoking; smokeless; cigarettes; cigar and ‘social network’ and reference lists of included articles will be hand searched. Studies will be included that provide descriptions of social network analysis of tobacco use. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method data that meets the inclusion criteria for the review, including methodological rigour, credibility and quality standards, will be synthesized using narrative synthesis. Results will be presented using outcome statistics that address each of the research questions. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide a timely evidence base on the role of social network analysis of tobacco use, forming a basis for future research, policy and practice in this area. This systematic review will synthesise the evidence, supporting the hypothesis that social network structures can influence tobacco use. This will also include exploring the relationship between social network structure, social network position, peer selection, peer influence and tobacco use across all age groups, and across different demographics. The research will increase our understanding of social networks and their impact on tobacco use, informing policy and practice while highlighting gaps in the literature and areas for further research. BioMed Central 2014-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4134108/ /pubmed/25108616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-85 Text en Copyright © 2014 Maddox et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Maddox, Raglan Davey, Rachel Lovett, Ray van der Sterren, Anke Corbett, Joan Cochrane, Tom A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use |
title | A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use |
title_full | A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use |
title_fullStr | A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use |
title_short | A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use |
title_sort | systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25108616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-85 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maddoxraglan asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT daveyrachel asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT lovettray asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT vandersterrenanke asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT corbettjoan asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT cochranetom asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT maddoxraglan systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT daveyrachel systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT lovettray systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT vandersterrenanke systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT corbettjoan systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse AT cochranetom systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse |