Cargando…

A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the world. Evidence indicates that behaviours such as tobacco use can influence social networks, and that social network structures can influence behaviours. Social network analysis provides a set of analytic tools to undertake...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maddox, Raglan, Davey, Rachel, Lovett, Ray, van der Sterren, Anke, Corbett, Joan, Cochrane, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25108616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-85
_version_ 1782330829315244032
author Maddox, Raglan
Davey, Rachel
Lovett, Ray
van der Sterren, Anke
Corbett, Joan
Cochrane, Tom
author_facet Maddox, Raglan
Davey, Rachel
Lovett, Ray
van der Sterren, Anke
Corbett, Joan
Cochrane, Tom
author_sort Maddox, Raglan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the world. Evidence indicates that behaviours such as tobacco use can influence social networks, and that social network structures can influence behaviours. Social network analysis provides a set of analytic tools to undertake methodical analysis of social networks. We will undertake a systematic review to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the literature regarding social network analysis and tobacco use. The review will answer the following research questions: among participants who use tobacco, does social network structure/position influence tobacco use? Does tobacco use influence peer selection? Does peer selection influence tobacco use? METHODS: We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and search the following databases for relevant articles: CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature); Informit Health Collection; PsycINFO; PubMed/MEDLINE; Scopus/Embase; Web of Science; and the Wiley Online Library. Keywords include tobacco; smoking; smokeless; cigarettes; cigar and ‘social network’ and reference lists of included articles will be hand searched. Studies will be included that provide descriptions of social network analysis of tobacco use. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method data that meets the inclusion criteria for the review, including methodological rigour, credibility and quality standards, will be synthesized using narrative synthesis. Results will be presented using outcome statistics that address each of the research questions. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide a timely evidence base on the role of social network analysis of tobacco use, forming a basis for future research, policy and practice in this area. This systematic review will synthesise the evidence, supporting the hypothesis that social network structures can influence tobacco use. This will also include exploring the relationship between social network structure, social network position, peer selection, peer influence and tobacco use across all age groups, and across different demographics. The research will increase our understanding of social networks and their impact on tobacco use, informing policy and practice while highlighting gaps in the literature and areas for further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4134108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41341082014-08-16 A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use Maddox, Raglan Davey, Rachel Lovett, Ray van der Sterren, Anke Corbett, Joan Cochrane, Tom Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the world. Evidence indicates that behaviours such as tobacco use can influence social networks, and that social network structures can influence behaviours. Social network analysis provides a set of analytic tools to undertake methodical analysis of social networks. We will undertake a systematic review to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the literature regarding social network analysis and tobacco use. The review will answer the following research questions: among participants who use tobacco, does social network structure/position influence tobacco use? Does tobacco use influence peer selection? Does peer selection influence tobacco use? METHODS: We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and search the following databases for relevant articles: CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature); Informit Health Collection; PsycINFO; PubMed/MEDLINE; Scopus/Embase; Web of Science; and the Wiley Online Library. Keywords include tobacco; smoking; smokeless; cigarettes; cigar and ‘social network’ and reference lists of included articles will be hand searched. Studies will be included that provide descriptions of social network analysis of tobacco use. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method data that meets the inclusion criteria for the review, including methodological rigour, credibility and quality standards, will be synthesized using narrative synthesis. Results will be presented using outcome statistics that address each of the research questions. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide a timely evidence base on the role of social network analysis of tobacco use, forming a basis for future research, policy and practice in this area. This systematic review will synthesise the evidence, supporting the hypothesis that social network structures can influence tobacco use. This will also include exploring the relationship between social network structure, social network position, peer selection, peer influence and tobacco use across all age groups, and across different demographics. The research will increase our understanding of social networks and their impact on tobacco use, informing policy and practice while highlighting gaps in the literature and areas for further research. BioMed Central 2014-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4134108/ /pubmed/25108616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-85 Text en Copyright © 2014 Maddox et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Maddox, Raglan
Davey, Rachel
Lovett, Ray
van der Sterren, Anke
Corbett, Joan
Cochrane, Tom
A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
title A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
title_full A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
title_fullStr A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
title_short A systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
title_sort systematic review protocol: social network analysis of tobacco use
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25108616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-85
work_keys_str_mv AT maddoxraglan asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT daveyrachel asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT lovettray asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT vandersterrenanke asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT corbettjoan asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT cochranetom asystematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT maddoxraglan systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT daveyrachel systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT lovettray systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT vandersterrenanke systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT corbettjoan systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse
AT cochranetom systematicreviewprotocolsocialnetworkanalysisoftobaccouse