Cargando…

Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems

BACKGROUND: Occlusion break surge during phacoemulsification cataract surgery can lead to potential surgical complications. The purpose of this study was to quantify occlusion break surge and vacuum rise time of current phacoemulsification systems used in cataract surgery. METHODS: Occlusion break s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharif-Kashani, Pooria, Fanney, Douglas, Injev, Val
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-96
_version_ 1782330830679441408
author Sharif-Kashani, Pooria
Fanney, Douglas
Injev, Val
author_facet Sharif-Kashani, Pooria
Fanney, Douglas
Injev, Val
author_sort Sharif-Kashani, Pooria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Occlusion break surge during phacoemulsification cataract surgery can lead to potential surgical complications. The purpose of this study was to quantify occlusion break surge and vacuum rise time of current phacoemulsification systems used in cataract surgery. METHODS: Occlusion break surge at vacuum pressures between 200 and 600 mmHg was assessed with the Infiniti® Vision System, the WhiteStar Signature® Phacoemulsification System, and the Centurion® Vision System using gravity-fed fluidics. Centurion Active Fluidics(TM) were also tested at multiple intraoperative pressure target settings. Vacuum rise time was evaluated for Infiniti, WhiteStar Signature, Centurion, and Stellaris® Vision Enhancement systems. Rise time to vacuum limits of 400 and 600 mmHg was assessed at flow rates of 30 and 60 cc/minute. Occlusion break surge was analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The Centurion system exhibited substantially less occlusion break surge than the other systems tested. Surge area with Centurion Active Fluidics was similar to gravity fluidics at an equivalent bottle height. At all Centurion Active Fluidics intraoperative pressure target settings tested, surge was smaller than with Infiniti and WhiteStar Signature. Infiniti had the fastest vacuum rise time and Stellaris had the slowest. No system tested reached the 600-mmHg vacuum limit. CONCLUSIONS: In this laboratory study, Centurion had the least occlusion break surge and similar vacuum rise times compared with the other systems tested. Reducing occlusion break surge may increase safety of phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4134114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41341142014-08-16 Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems Sharif-Kashani, Pooria Fanney, Douglas Injev, Val BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Occlusion break surge during phacoemulsification cataract surgery can lead to potential surgical complications. The purpose of this study was to quantify occlusion break surge and vacuum rise time of current phacoemulsification systems used in cataract surgery. METHODS: Occlusion break surge at vacuum pressures between 200 and 600 mmHg was assessed with the Infiniti® Vision System, the WhiteStar Signature® Phacoemulsification System, and the Centurion® Vision System using gravity-fed fluidics. Centurion Active Fluidics(TM) were also tested at multiple intraoperative pressure target settings. Vacuum rise time was evaluated for Infiniti, WhiteStar Signature, Centurion, and Stellaris® Vision Enhancement systems. Rise time to vacuum limits of 400 and 600 mmHg was assessed at flow rates of 30 and 60 cc/minute. Occlusion break surge was analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The Centurion system exhibited substantially less occlusion break surge than the other systems tested. Surge area with Centurion Active Fluidics was similar to gravity fluidics at an equivalent bottle height. At all Centurion Active Fluidics intraoperative pressure target settings tested, surge was smaller than with Infiniti and WhiteStar Signature. Infiniti had the fastest vacuum rise time and Stellaris had the slowest. No system tested reached the 600-mmHg vacuum limit. CONCLUSIONS: In this laboratory study, Centurion had the least occlusion break surge and similar vacuum rise times compared with the other systems tested. Reducing occlusion break surge may increase safety of phacoemulsification cataract surgery. BioMed Central 2014-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4134114/ /pubmed/25074069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-96 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sharif-Kashani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sharif-Kashani, Pooria
Fanney, Douglas
Injev, Val
Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems
title Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems
title_full Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems
title_fullStr Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems
title_short Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems
title_sort comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-96
work_keys_str_mv AT sharifkashanipooria comparisonofocclusionbreakresponsesandvacuumrisetimesofphacoemulsificationsystems
AT fanneydouglas comparisonofocclusionbreakresponsesandvacuumrisetimesofphacoemulsificationsystems
AT injevval comparisonofocclusionbreakresponsesandvacuumrisetimesofphacoemulsificationsystems