Cargando…

Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation

Human-carnivore conflict continues to present a major conservation challenge around the world. Translocation of large carnivores is widely implemented but remains strongly debated, in part because of a lack of cost transparency. We report detailed translocation costs for three large carnivore specie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weise, Florian J., Stratford, Ken J., van Vuuren, Rudolf J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105042
_version_ 1782330856586608640
author Weise, Florian J.
Stratford, Ken J.
van Vuuren, Rudolf J.
author_facet Weise, Florian J.
Stratford, Ken J.
van Vuuren, Rudolf J.
author_sort Weise, Florian J.
collection PubMed
description Human-carnivore conflict continues to present a major conservation challenge around the world. Translocation of large carnivores is widely implemented but remains strongly debated, in part because of a lack of cost transparency. We report detailed translocation costs for three large carnivore species in Namibia and across different translocation scenarios. We consider the effect of various parameters and factors on costs and translocation success. Total translocation cost for 30 individuals in 22 events was $80,681 (US Dollars). Median translocation cost per individual was $2,393, and $2,669 per event. Median cost per cheetah was $2,760 (n = 23), and $2,108 per leopard (n = 6). One hyaena was translocated at a cost of $1,672. Tracking technology was the single biggest cost element (56%), followed by captive holding and feeding. Soft releases, prolonged captivity and orphaned individuals also increased case-specific costs. A substantial proportion (65.4%) of the total translocation cost was successfully recovered from public interest groups. Less than half the translocations were confirmed successes (44.4%, 3 unknown) with a strong species bias. Four leopards (66.7%) were successfully translocated but only eight of the 20 cheetahs (40.0%) with known outcome met these strict criteria. None of the five habituated cheetahs was translocated successfully, nor was the hyaena. We introduce the concept of Individual Conservation Cost (ICC) and define it as the cost of one successfully translocated individual adjusted by costs of unsuccessful events of the same species. The median ICC for cheetah was $6,898 and $3,140 for leopard. Translocations are costly, but we demonstrate that they are not inherently more expensive than other strategies currently employed in non-lethal carnivore conflict management. We conclude that translocation should be one available option for conserving large carnivores, but needs to be critically evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4134276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41342762014-08-19 Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation Weise, Florian J. Stratford, Ken J. van Vuuren, Rudolf J. PLoS One Research Article Human-carnivore conflict continues to present a major conservation challenge around the world. Translocation of large carnivores is widely implemented but remains strongly debated, in part because of a lack of cost transparency. We report detailed translocation costs for three large carnivore species in Namibia and across different translocation scenarios. We consider the effect of various parameters and factors on costs and translocation success. Total translocation cost for 30 individuals in 22 events was $80,681 (US Dollars). Median translocation cost per individual was $2,393, and $2,669 per event. Median cost per cheetah was $2,760 (n = 23), and $2,108 per leopard (n = 6). One hyaena was translocated at a cost of $1,672. Tracking technology was the single biggest cost element (56%), followed by captive holding and feeding. Soft releases, prolonged captivity and orphaned individuals also increased case-specific costs. A substantial proportion (65.4%) of the total translocation cost was successfully recovered from public interest groups. Less than half the translocations were confirmed successes (44.4%, 3 unknown) with a strong species bias. Four leopards (66.7%) were successfully translocated but only eight of the 20 cheetahs (40.0%) with known outcome met these strict criteria. None of the five habituated cheetahs was translocated successfully, nor was the hyaena. We introduce the concept of Individual Conservation Cost (ICC) and define it as the cost of one successfully translocated individual adjusted by costs of unsuccessful events of the same species. The median ICC for cheetah was $6,898 and $3,140 for leopard. Translocations are costly, but we demonstrate that they are not inherently more expensive than other strategies currently employed in non-lethal carnivore conflict management. We conclude that translocation should be one available option for conserving large carnivores, but needs to be critically evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Public Library of Science 2014-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4134276/ /pubmed/25126849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105042 Text en © 2014 Weise et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weise, Florian J.
Stratford, Ken J.
van Vuuren, Rudolf J.
Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation
title Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation
title_full Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation
title_fullStr Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation
title_full_unstemmed Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation
title_short Financial Costs of Large Carnivore Translocations – Accounting for Conservation
title_sort financial costs of large carnivore translocations – accounting for conservation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105042
work_keys_str_mv AT weiseflorianj financialcostsoflargecarnivoretranslocationsaccountingforconservation
AT stratfordkenj financialcostsoflargecarnivoretranslocationsaccountingforconservation
AT vanvuurenrudolfj financialcostsoflargecarnivoretranslocationsaccountingforconservation