Cargando…
A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide
Post-marketing drug surveillance for adverse drug events (ADEs) has typically relied on spontaneous reporting. Recently, regulatory agencies have turned their attention to more preemptive approaches that use existing data for surveillance. We conducted an environmental scan to identify active survei...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25022829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0194-3 |
_version_ | 1782330875079294976 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yu-Lin Moon, Jinhee Segal, Jodi B. |
author_facet | Huang, Yu-Lin Moon, Jinhee Segal, Jodi B. |
author_sort | Huang, Yu-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post-marketing drug surveillance for adverse drug events (ADEs) has typically relied on spontaneous reporting. Recently, regulatory agencies have turned their attention to more preemptive approaches that use existing data for surveillance. We conducted an environmental scan to identify active surveillance systems worldwide that use existing data for the detection of ADEs. We extracted data about the systems’ structures, data, and functions. We synthesized the information across systems to identify common features of these systems. We identified nine active surveillance systems. Two systems are US based—the FDA Sentinel Initiative (including both the Mini-Sentinel Initiative and the Federal Partner Collaboration) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD); two are Canadian–the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES) and the Vaccine and Immunization Surveillance in Ontario (VISION); and two are European–the Exploring and Understanding Adverse Drug Reactions by Integrative Mining of Clinical Records and Biomedical Knowledge (EU-ADR) Alliance and the Vaccine Adverse Event Surveillance and Communication (VAESCO). Additionally, there is the Asian Pharmacoepidemiology Network (AsPEN) and the Shanghai Drug Monitoring and Evaluative System (SDMES). We identified two systems in the UK—the Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines (VRMM) Division and the Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU), an independent academic unit. These surveillance systems mostly use administrative claims or electronic medical records; most conduct pharmacovigilance on behalf of a regulatory agency. Either a common data model or a centralized model is used to access existing data. The systems have been built using national data alone or via partnership with other countries. However, active surveillance systems using existing data remain rare. North America and Europe have the most population coverage; with Asian countries making good advances. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0194-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4134479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41344792014-08-21 A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide Huang, Yu-Lin Moon, Jinhee Segal, Jodi B. Drug Saf Review Article Post-marketing drug surveillance for adverse drug events (ADEs) has typically relied on spontaneous reporting. Recently, regulatory agencies have turned their attention to more preemptive approaches that use existing data for surveillance. We conducted an environmental scan to identify active surveillance systems worldwide that use existing data for the detection of ADEs. We extracted data about the systems’ structures, data, and functions. We synthesized the information across systems to identify common features of these systems. We identified nine active surveillance systems. Two systems are US based—the FDA Sentinel Initiative (including both the Mini-Sentinel Initiative and the Federal Partner Collaboration) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD); two are Canadian–the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES) and the Vaccine and Immunization Surveillance in Ontario (VISION); and two are European–the Exploring and Understanding Adverse Drug Reactions by Integrative Mining of Clinical Records and Biomedical Knowledge (EU-ADR) Alliance and the Vaccine Adverse Event Surveillance and Communication (VAESCO). Additionally, there is the Asian Pharmacoepidemiology Network (AsPEN) and the Shanghai Drug Monitoring and Evaluative System (SDMES). We identified two systems in the UK—the Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines (VRMM) Division and the Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU), an independent academic unit. These surveillance systems mostly use administrative claims or electronic medical records; most conduct pharmacovigilance on behalf of a regulatory agency. Either a common data model or a centralized model is used to access existing data. The systems have been built using national data alone or via partnership with other countries. However, active surveillance systems using existing data remain rare. North America and Europe have the most population coverage; with Asian countries making good advances. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0194-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-07-15 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4134479/ /pubmed/25022829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0194-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Huang, Yu-Lin Moon, Jinhee Segal, Jodi B. A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide |
title | A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide |
title_full | A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide |
title_short | A Comparison of Active Adverse Event Surveillance Systems Worldwide |
title_sort | comparison of active adverse event surveillance systems worldwide |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25022829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0194-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyulin acomparisonofactiveadverseeventsurveillancesystemsworldwide AT moonjinhee acomparisonofactiveadverseeventsurveillancesystemsworldwide AT segaljodib acomparisonofactiveadverseeventsurveillancesystemsworldwide AT huangyulin comparisonofactiveadverseeventsurveillancesystemsworldwide AT moonjinhee comparisonofactiveadverseeventsurveillancesystemsworldwide AT segaljodib comparisonofactiveadverseeventsurveillancesystemsworldwide |