Cargando…

Clinical Availability of Component-Resolved Diagnosis Using Microarray Technology in Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Various allergens play a role in the elicitation or exacerbation of eczematous skin lesions in atopic dermatitis (AD), and much research effort has been focused on improving diagnostic tests to identify causative allergens. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Joon-Seok, Roh, Joo-Young, Lee, Jong-Rok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Dermatological Association; The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143671
http://dx.doi.org/10.5021/ad.2014.26.4.437
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Various allergens play a role in the elicitation or exacerbation of eczematous skin lesions in atopic dermatitis (AD), and much research effort has been focused on improving diagnostic tests to identify causative allergens. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of a newly introduced microarray-based specific immunoglobulin E detection assay, ImmunoCAP ISAC, for use in AD patients. METHODS: The serum samples of 25 AD patients were tested by using ISAC and a multiple allergen simultaneous test-enzyme immunoassay (MAST-EIA). In addition, 10 of the 25 patients underwent skin prick testing (SPT). The positive reaction rates to allergens in each test and the agreements, sensitivities, and specificities of ISAC and MAST-EIA were evaluated versus the SPT results. RESULTS: For ISAC versus SPT, the overall results were as follows: sensitivity, 90.0%; specificity, 98.2%; positive predictive value (PPV), 90.0%; and negative predictive value (NPV), 98.2%. The total agreement and κ value for ISAC versus SPT were 96.9% and 0.882, respectively. For MAST-EIA versus SPT, the sensitivity was 80.0%, specificity 92.7%, PPV 66.7%, and NPV 96.2%. The total agreement and κ value for MAST-EIA versus SPT were 90.8% and 0.672, respectively. The overall agreement between the ISAC and MAST-EIA results was 88%. CONCLUSION: The ISAC results in AD correlated well with the SPT results, and compared favorably to the MAST-EIA results. This study demonstrates the potential of ISAC as a convenient allergic diagnostic method in AD patients.