Cargando…

“If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study

BACKGROUND: The relationship between infection with high-risk strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer is transforming prevention through HPV vaccination and HPV oncogenic testing. In Ireland, a national cervical cancer screening programme and HPV vaccination were recently launched;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McRae, Judith, Martin, Cara, O’Leary, John, Sharp, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-64
_version_ 1782330978038972416
author McRae, Judith
Martin, Cara
O’Leary, John
Sharp, Linda
author_facet McRae, Judith
Martin, Cara
O’Leary, John
Sharp, Linda
author_sort McRae, Judith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship between infection with high-risk strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer is transforming prevention through HPV vaccination and HPV oncogenic testing. In Ireland, a national cervical cancer screening programme and HPV vaccination were recently launched; HPV testing is currently being integrated into the screening programme. Women’s views on the transformation of cervical cancer prevention have been relatively little investigated. METHODS: Using qualitative focus groups, we determined women’s knowledge, attitudes towards, and acceptability of cervical cancer screening, HPV oncogenic testing and vaccination of HPV. Fifty nine women, recruited through primary care in Ireland, participated in ten focus groups. A dynamic topic guide was developed from literature reviewed. Women were provided with standardised information about HPV infection, HPV testing. Discussion transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS: The primary themes that emerged regarding HPV infection were: knowledge, emotional response and societal influences; especially those of healthcare practitioners. Knowledge, logistics, and psychological impact were the primary themes relating to HPV testing. Women’s attitudes towards HPV testing changed during discussion as issues were explored, thus demonstrating the complexity of this issue; lack of existing treatment for HPV infection influenced women’s attitudes, attachment to existing cervical cancer screening also was a significant factor. CONCLUSIONS: Women currently have a strong attachment to cytology and any changes towards HPV primary testing will need to be managed carefully. To ensure that future cervical cancer prevention strategies will be acceptable to women, sufficient thought will have to be given to information provision and education. We identified the importance to women of healthcare practitioners’ opinions regarding HPV. Appropriate and timely information on HPV will be crucial in order to minimise possible psychological effects women may have.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4135323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41353232014-08-19 “If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study McRae, Judith Martin, Cara O’Leary, John Sharp, Linda BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The relationship between infection with high-risk strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer is transforming prevention through HPV vaccination and HPV oncogenic testing. In Ireland, a national cervical cancer screening programme and HPV vaccination were recently launched; HPV testing is currently being integrated into the screening programme. Women’s views on the transformation of cervical cancer prevention have been relatively little investigated. METHODS: Using qualitative focus groups, we determined women’s knowledge, attitudes towards, and acceptability of cervical cancer screening, HPV oncogenic testing and vaccination of HPV. Fifty nine women, recruited through primary care in Ireland, participated in ten focus groups. A dynamic topic guide was developed from literature reviewed. Women were provided with standardised information about HPV infection, HPV testing. Discussion transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS: The primary themes that emerged regarding HPV infection were: knowledge, emotional response and societal influences; especially those of healthcare practitioners. Knowledge, logistics, and psychological impact were the primary themes relating to HPV testing. Women’s attitudes towards HPV testing changed during discussion as issues were explored, thus demonstrating the complexity of this issue; lack of existing treatment for HPV infection influenced women’s attitudes, attachment to existing cervical cancer screening also was a significant factor. CONCLUSIONS: Women currently have a strong attachment to cytology and any changes towards HPV primary testing will need to be managed carefully. To ensure that future cervical cancer prevention strategies will be acceptable to women, sufficient thought will have to be given to information provision and education. We identified the importance to women of healthcare practitioners’ opinions regarding HPV. Appropriate and timely information on HPV will be crucial in order to minimise possible psychological effects women may have. BioMed Central 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4135323/ /pubmed/24885650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-64 Text en Copyright © 2014 McRae et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McRae, Judith
Martin, Cara
O’Leary, John
Sharp, Linda
“If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study
title “If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study
title_full “If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study
title_fullStr “If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study
title_full_unstemmed “If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study
title_short “If you can’t treat HPV, why test for it?” Women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study
title_sort “if you can’t treat hpv, why test for it?” women’s attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-64
work_keys_str_mv AT mcraejudith ifyoucanttreathpvwhytestforitwomensattitudestothechangingfaceofcervicalcancerpreventionafocusgroupstudy
AT martincara ifyoucanttreathpvwhytestforitwomensattitudestothechangingfaceofcervicalcancerpreventionafocusgroupstudy
AT olearyjohn ifyoucanttreathpvwhytestforitwomensattitudestothechangingfaceofcervicalcancerpreventionafocusgroupstudy
AT sharplinda ifyoucanttreathpvwhytestforitwomensattitudestothechangingfaceofcervicalcancerpreventionafocusgroupstudy