Cargando…

The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: A number of clinical and experimental studies have investigated the effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation (AF), but the results are equivocal. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether atorvastatin can reduce the risk of AF in different populations. METHODS: We searche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Qian, Qi, Xiaoyong, Li, Yingxiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25117689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-99
_version_ 1782330984129101824
author Yang, Qian
Qi, Xiaoyong
Li, Yingxiao
author_facet Yang, Qian
Qi, Xiaoyong
Li, Yingxiao
author_sort Yang, Qian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of clinical and experimental studies have investigated the effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation (AF), but the results are equivocal. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether atorvastatin can reduce the risk of AF in different populations. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database for all published studies that examined the effect of atorvastatin therapy on AF up to April 2014. A random effects model was used when there was substantial heterogeneity and a fixed effects model when there was negligible heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighteen published studies including 9952 patients with sinus rhythm were identified for inclusion in the analysis. Ten studies investigated primary prevention of AF by atorvastatin in patients without AF, seven studies investigated secondary prevention of atorvastatin in patients with AF, and one study investigated mixed populations of patients. Overall, atorvastatin was associated with a decreased risk of AF (odds ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–0.70, P < 0.0001). However, subgroup analyses showed that in the primary prevention subgroup (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.81, P = 0.002), atorvastatin reduced the risk of new-onset AF in patients after coronary surgery (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.68, P = 0.0002), but had no beneficial effect in patients without coronary surgery (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.59–1.58, P = 0.89); in the secondary prevention subgroup, atorvastatin had no beneficial effect on AF recurrence in patients with electrical cardioversion (EC) (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.25–1.32, P = 0.19) or without EC (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14–1.06, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that atorvastatin has an overall protective effect against AF. However, this preventive effect was not seen in all types of AF. Atorvastatin was significantly associated with a decreased risk of new-onset AF in patients after coronary surgery. Moreover, atorvastatin did not prove to exert a significant protective effect against the AF recurrences in both patients who had experienced sinus rhythm restoration by means of EC and those who had obtained cardioversion by means of drug therapy. Thus, further prospective studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4135360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41353602014-08-19 The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Yang, Qian Qi, Xiaoyong Li, Yingxiao BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A number of clinical and experimental studies have investigated the effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation (AF), but the results are equivocal. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether atorvastatin can reduce the risk of AF in different populations. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database for all published studies that examined the effect of atorvastatin therapy on AF up to April 2014. A random effects model was used when there was substantial heterogeneity and a fixed effects model when there was negligible heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighteen published studies including 9952 patients with sinus rhythm were identified for inclusion in the analysis. Ten studies investigated primary prevention of AF by atorvastatin in patients without AF, seven studies investigated secondary prevention of atorvastatin in patients with AF, and one study investigated mixed populations of patients. Overall, atorvastatin was associated with a decreased risk of AF (odds ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–0.70, P < 0.0001). However, subgroup analyses showed that in the primary prevention subgroup (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.81, P = 0.002), atorvastatin reduced the risk of new-onset AF in patients after coronary surgery (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.68, P = 0.0002), but had no beneficial effect in patients without coronary surgery (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.59–1.58, P = 0.89); in the secondary prevention subgroup, atorvastatin had no beneficial effect on AF recurrence in patients with electrical cardioversion (EC) (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.25–1.32, P = 0.19) or without EC (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14–1.06, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that atorvastatin has an overall protective effect against AF. However, this preventive effect was not seen in all types of AF. Atorvastatin was significantly associated with a decreased risk of new-onset AF in patients after coronary surgery. Moreover, atorvastatin did not prove to exert a significant protective effect against the AF recurrences in both patients who had experienced sinus rhythm restoration by means of EC and those who had obtained cardioversion by means of drug therapy. Thus, further prospective studies are warranted. BioMed Central 2014-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4135360/ /pubmed/25117689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-99 Text en Copyright © 2014 Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Qian
Qi, Xiaoyong
Li, Yingxiao
The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort preventive effect of atorvastatin on atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25117689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-99
work_keys_str_mv AT yangqian thepreventiveeffectofatorvastatinonatrialfibrillationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT qixiaoyong thepreventiveeffectofatorvastatinonatrialfibrillationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liyingxiao thepreventiveeffectofatorvastatinonatrialfibrillationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangqian preventiveeffectofatorvastatinonatrialfibrillationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT qixiaoyong preventiveeffectofatorvastatinonatrialfibrillationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liyingxiao preventiveeffectofatorvastatinonatrialfibrillationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials