Cargando…

Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)

Background: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower- or no-calorie alternatives may facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however, past research examining low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) and body weight has produced mixed results. Objective: The objectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Paige E, Perez, Vanessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Nutrition 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.082826
_version_ 1782330987894538240
author Miller, Paige E
Perez, Vanessa
author_facet Miller, Paige E
Perez, Vanessa
author_sort Miller, Paige E
collection PubMed
description Background: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower- or no-calorie alternatives may facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however, past research examining low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) and body weight has produced mixed results. Objective: The objective was to systematically review and quantitatively evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies, separately, that examined the relation between LCSs and body weight and composition. Design: A systematic literature search identified 15 RCTs and 9 prospective cohort studies that examined LCSs from foods or beverages or LCSs consumed as tabletop sweeteners. Meta-analyses generated weighted mean differences in body weight and composition values between the LCS and control groups among RCTs and weighted mean correlations for LCS intake and these parameters among prospective cohort studies. Results: In RCTs, LCSs modestly but significantly reduced all outcomes examined, including body weight (−0.80 kg; 95% CI: −1.17, −0.43), body mass index [BMI (in kg/m(2)): −0.24; 95% CI: −0.41, −0.07], fat mass (−1.10 kg; 95% CI: −1.77, −0.44), and waist circumference (−0.83 cm; 95% CI: −1.29, −0.37). Among prospective cohort studies, LCS intake was not associated with body weight or fat mass, but was significantly associated with slightly higher BMI (0.03; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.06). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis provides a rigorous evaluation of the scientific evidence on LCSs and body weight and composition. Findings from observational studies showed no association between LCS intake and body weight or fat mass and a small positive association with BMI; however, data from RCTs, which provide the highest quality of evidence for examining the potentially causal effects of LCS intake, indicate that substituting LCS options for their regular-calorie versions results in a modest weight loss and may be a useful dietary tool to improve compliance with weight loss or weight maintenance plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4135487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Society for Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41354872014-08-26 Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) Miller, Paige E Perez, Vanessa Am J Clin Nutr Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition Background: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower- or no-calorie alternatives may facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however, past research examining low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) and body weight has produced mixed results. Objective: The objective was to systematically review and quantitatively evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies, separately, that examined the relation between LCSs and body weight and composition. Design: A systematic literature search identified 15 RCTs and 9 prospective cohort studies that examined LCSs from foods or beverages or LCSs consumed as tabletop sweeteners. Meta-analyses generated weighted mean differences in body weight and composition values between the LCS and control groups among RCTs and weighted mean correlations for LCS intake and these parameters among prospective cohort studies. Results: In RCTs, LCSs modestly but significantly reduced all outcomes examined, including body weight (−0.80 kg; 95% CI: −1.17, −0.43), body mass index [BMI (in kg/m(2)): −0.24; 95% CI: −0.41, −0.07], fat mass (−1.10 kg; 95% CI: −1.77, −0.44), and waist circumference (−0.83 cm; 95% CI: −1.29, −0.37). Among prospective cohort studies, LCS intake was not associated with body weight or fat mass, but was significantly associated with slightly higher BMI (0.03; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.06). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis provides a rigorous evaluation of the scientific evidence on LCSs and body weight and composition. Findings from observational studies showed no association between LCS intake and body weight or fat mass and a small positive association with BMI; however, data from RCTs, which provide the highest quality of evidence for examining the potentially causal effects of LCS intake, indicate that substituting LCS options for their regular-calorie versions results in a modest weight loss and may be a useful dietary tool to improve compliance with weight loss or weight maintenance plans. American Society for Nutrition 2014-09 2014-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4135487/ /pubmed/24944060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.082826 Text en © 2014 American Society for Nutrition This is a free access article, distributed under terms (http://www.nutrition.org/publications/guidelines-and-policies/license/) that permit unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition
Miller, Paige E
Perez, Vanessa
Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
title Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
title_full Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
title_fullStr Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
title_full_unstemmed Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
title_short Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
title_sort low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
topic Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.082826
work_keys_str_mv AT millerpaigee lowcaloriesweetenersandbodyweightandcompositionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies123
AT perezvanessa lowcaloriesweetenersandbodyweightandcompositionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies123