Cargando…
Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3)
Background: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower- or no-calorie alternatives may facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however, past research examining low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) and body weight has produced mixed results. Objective: The objectiv...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Nutrition
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.082826 |
_version_ | 1782330987894538240 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Paige E Perez, Vanessa |
author_facet | Miller, Paige E Perez, Vanessa |
author_sort | Miller, Paige E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower- or no-calorie alternatives may facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however, past research examining low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) and body weight has produced mixed results. Objective: The objective was to systematically review and quantitatively evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies, separately, that examined the relation between LCSs and body weight and composition. Design: A systematic literature search identified 15 RCTs and 9 prospective cohort studies that examined LCSs from foods or beverages or LCSs consumed as tabletop sweeteners. Meta-analyses generated weighted mean differences in body weight and composition values between the LCS and control groups among RCTs and weighted mean correlations for LCS intake and these parameters among prospective cohort studies. Results: In RCTs, LCSs modestly but significantly reduced all outcomes examined, including body weight (−0.80 kg; 95% CI: −1.17, −0.43), body mass index [BMI (in kg/m(2)): −0.24; 95% CI: −0.41, −0.07], fat mass (−1.10 kg; 95% CI: −1.77, −0.44), and waist circumference (−0.83 cm; 95% CI: −1.29, −0.37). Among prospective cohort studies, LCS intake was not associated with body weight or fat mass, but was significantly associated with slightly higher BMI (0.03; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.06). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis provides a rigorous evaluation of the scientific evidence on LCSs and body weight and composition. Findings from observational studies showed no association between LCS intake and body weight or fat mass and a small positive association with BMI; however, data from RCTs, which provide the highest quality of evidence for examining the potentially causal effects of LCS intake, indicate that substituting LCS options for their regular-calorie versions results in a modest weight loss and may be a useful dietary tool to improve compliance with weight loss or weight maintenance plans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4135487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | American Society for Nutrition |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41354872014-08-26 Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) Miller, Paige E Perez, Vanessa Am J Clin Nutr Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition Background: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower- or no-calorie alternatives may facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however, past research examining low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) and body weight has produced mixed results. Objective: The objective was to systematically review and quantitatively evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies, separately, that examined the relation between LCSs and body weight and composition. Design: A systematic literature search identified 15 RCTs and 9 prospective cohort studies that examined LCSs from foods or beverages or LCSs consumed as tabletop sweeteners. Meta-analyses generated weighted mean differences in body weight and composition values between the LCS and control groups among RCTs and weighted mean correlations for LCS intake and these parameters among prospective cohort studies. Results: In RCTs, LCSs modestly but significantly reduced all outcomes examined, including body weight (−0.80 kg; 95% CI: −1.17, −0.43), body mass index [BMI (in kg/m(2)): −0.24; 95% CI: −0.41, −0.07], fat mass (−1.10 kg; 95% CI: −1.77, −0.44), and waist circumference (−0.83 cm; 95% CI: −1.29, −0.37). Among prospective cohort studies, LCS intake was not associated with body weight or fat mass, but was significantly associated with slightly higher BMI (0.03; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.06). Conclusions: The current meta-analysis provides a rigorous evaluation of the scientific evidence on LCSs and body weight and composition. Findings from observational studies showed no association between LCS intake and body weight or fat mass and a small positive association with BMI; however, data from RCTs, which provide the highest quality of evidence for examining the potentially causal effects of LCS intake, indicate that substituting LCS options for their regular-calorie versions results in a modest weight loss and may be a useful dietary tool to improve compliance with weight loss or weight maintenance plans. American Society for Nutrition 2014-09 2014-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4135487/ /pubmed/24944060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.082826 Text en © 2014 American Society for Nutrition This is a free access article, distributed under terms (http://www.nutrition.org/publications/guidelines-and-policies/license/) that permit unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition Miller, Paige E Perez, Vanessa Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) |
title | Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) |
title_full | Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) |
title_fullStr | Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) |
title_short | Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) |
title_sort | low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies(1)(2)(3) |
topic | Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4135487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.082826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerpaigee lowcaloriesweetenersandbodyweightandcompositionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies123 AT perezvanessa lowcaloriesweetenersandbodyweightandcompositionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandprospectivecohortstudies123 |