Cargando…

The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVES: Modern implants for proximal femur fracture treatment have clearly improved clinical results. However, complications, including cut-out and loss of reduction, requiring revision surgery still occur. A major challenge in these cases is a loss of bone stock due to the existing implant, whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scola, Alexander, Gebhard, Florian, Dehner, Christoph, Röderer, Götz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4136372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25136390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010232
_version_ 1782330995193675776
author Scola, Alexander
Gebhard, Florian
Dehner, Christoph
Röderer, Götz
author_facet Scola, Alexander
Gebhard, Florian
Dehner, Christoph
Röderer, Götz
author_sort Scola, Alexander
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Modern implants for proximal femur fracture treatment have clearly improved clinical results. However, complications, including cut-out and loss of reduction, requiring revision surgery still occur. A major challenge in these cases is a loss of bone stock due to the existing implant, which is usually exacerbated by osteoporosis. A potential solution is the augmentation of implants, for example, of the femoral neck blade using bone cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients (five loosening of femoral neck implant, two pseudarthrosis, two implant failures and one acute fracture) were included. The initial hardware was removed and a PFNA augmented was implanted. The perforated femoral neck blade was augmented using polymethyl methacrylate cement. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a mean of 5.4 months (SD ±4.34). The main outcome parameters were fracture healing and implant-related complications. RESULTS: Technical handling was uneventful in all cases. No cement leakage into the joint occurred in any of the cases. The mean amount of cement injected was 5.3 ml. The fracture healed during follow-up in all cases except two patients who died from causes unrelated to the procedure and prior to complete consolidation. Problem-free elective hardware removal of the PFNA augmented was performed in two cases. DISCUSSION: The PFNA augmented is a potential implant for joint-preserving revision surgery in proximal femur fractures. The augmentation improves implant anchorage in the impaired bone stock. In this preliminary series, no negative biological side effects of the cement (i.e. osteonecrosis) were observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4136372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41363722014-08-18 The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures Scola, Alexander Gebhard, Florian Dehner, Christoph Röderer, Götz Open Orthop J Article OBJECTIVES: Modern implants for proximal femur fracture treatment have clearly improved clinical results. However, complications, including cut-out and loss of reduction, requiring revision surgery still occur. A major challenge in these cases is a loss of bone stock due to the existing implant, which is usually exacerbated by osteoporosis. A potential solution is the augmentation of implants, for example, of the femoral neck blade using bone cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients (five loosening of femoral neck implant, two pseudarthrosis, two implant failures and one acute fracture) were included. The initial hardware was removed and a PFNA augmented was implanted. The perforated femoral neck blade was augmented using polymethyl methacrylate cement. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a mean of 5.4 months (SD ±4.34). The main outcome parameters were fracture healing and implant-related complications. RESULTS: Technical handling was uneventful in all cases. No cement leakage into the joint occurred in any of the cases. The mean amount of cement injected was 5.3 ml. The fracture healed during follow-up in all cases except two patients who died from causes unrelated to the procedure and prior to complete consolidation. Problem-free elective hardware removal of the PFNA augmented was performed in two cases. DISCUSSION: The PFNA augmented is a potential implant for joint-preserving revision surgery in proximal femur fractures. The augmentation improves implant anchorage in the impaired bone stock. In this preliminary series, no negative biological side effects of the cement (i.e. osteonecrosis) were observed. Bentham Open 2014-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4136372/ /pubmed/25136390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010232 Text en © Scola et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Scola, Alexander
Gebhard, Florian
Dehner, Christoph
Röderer, Götz
The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures
title The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_full The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_fullStr The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_full_unstemmed The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_short The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures
title_sort pfna® augmented in revision surgery of proximal femur fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4136372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25136390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010232
work_keys_str_mv AT scolaalexander thepfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures
AT gebhardflorian thepfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures
AT dehnerchristoph thepfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures
AT roderergotz thepfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures
AT scolaalexander pfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures
AT gebhardflorian pfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures
AT dehnerchristoph pfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures
AT roderergotz pfnaaugmentedinrevisionsurgeryofproximalfemurfractures