Cargando…
Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery
BACKGROUND: In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4136948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-91 |
_version_ | 1782331054852407296 |
---|---|
author | Engelhardt, Alexander Kanawade, Rajesh Knipfer, Christian Schmid, Matthias Stelzle, Florian Adler, Werner |
author_facet | Engelhardt, Alexander Kanawade, Rajesh Knipfer, Christian Schmid, Matthias Stelzle, Florian Adler, Werner |
author_sort | Engelhardt, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm. METHODS: In this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms’ performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set. RESULTS: Most classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra. The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4136948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41369482014-08-25 Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery Engelhardt, Alexander Kanawade, Rajesh Knipfer, Christian Schmid, Matthias Stelzle, Florian Adler, Werner BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm. METHODS: In this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms’ performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set. RESULTS: Most classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra. The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery. BioMed Central 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4136948/ /pubmed/25030085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-91 Text en Copyright © 2014 Engelhardt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Engelhardt, Alexander Kanawade, Rajesh Knipfer, Christian Schmid, Matthias Stelzle, Florian Adler, Werner Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery |
title | Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery |
title_full | Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery |
title_short | Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery |
title_sort | comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4136948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-91 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engelhardtalexander comparingclassificationmethodsfordiffusereflectancespectratoimprovetissuespecificlasersurgery AT kanawaderajesh comparingclassificationmethodsfordiffusereflectancespectratoimprovetissuespecificlasersurgery AT knipferchristian comparingclassificationmethodsfordiffusereflectancespectratoimprovetissuespecificlasersurgery AT schmidmatthias comparingclassificationmethodsfordiffusereflectancespectratoimprovetissuespecificlasersurgery AT stelzleflorian comparingclassificationmethodsfordiffusereflectancespectratoimprovetissuespecificlasersurgery AT adlerwerner comparingclassificationmethodsfordiffusereflectancespectratoimprovetissuespecificlasersurgery |