Cargando…

Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides significant relief for lumbosacral radiculopathy refractory to both medical and surgical treatment, but historically only offers limited relief for axial low back pain (LBP). We aim to evaluate the response of chronic axial LBP treated with SCS us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stidd, David A, Rivero, Sergio, Weinand, Martin E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4136982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143753
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S66414
_version_ 1782331059576242176
author Stidd, David A
Rivero, Sergio
Weinand, Martin E
author_facet Stidd, David A
Rivero, Sergio
Weinand, Martin E
author_sort Stidd, David A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides significant relief for lumbosacral radiculopathy refractory to both medical and surgical treatment, but historically only offers limited relief for axial low back pain (LBP). We aim to evaluate the response of chronic axial LBP treated with SCS using a surgically implanted epidural paddle lead. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with exclusive LBP or predominant LBP associated with lower extremity (LE) pain evaluated and treated with SCS using an implanted paddle lead within the dorsal thoracic epidural space. Baseline LBP, and if present LE pain, were recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at an initial evaluation. At a follow-up visit (a minimum of 12 months later), LBP and LE pain after a spinal cord stimulator implantation were again recorded using the VAS. Patients were also asked to estimate total LBP pain relief achieved. RESULTS: Patients with either exclusive (n=7) or predominant (n=2) axial LBP were treated with SCS by implantation of a paddle lead at an average spine level of T9. The baseline VAS score for LBP was 7.2; after a follow-up of 20 months, the score decreased to 2.3 (P=0.003). The LE pain VAS score decreased from 7.5 to 0.0 (P=0.103). Patients also reported a subjective 66.4% decrease of their LBP at follow-up. There were no surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Axial LBP is refractory to many treatments, including SCS. SCS using a surgically implanted paddle electrode provides significant pain relief for chronic axial LPB, and is a safe treatment modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4136982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41369822014-08-20 Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain Stidd, David A Rivero, Sergio Weinand, Martin E J Pain Res Review INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides significant relief for lumbosacral radiculopathy refractory to both medical and surgical treatment, but historically only offers limited relief for axial low back pain (LBP). We aim to evaluate the response of chronic axial LBP treated with SCS using a surgically implanted epidural paddle lead. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with exclusive LBP or predominant LBP associated with lower extremity (LE) pain evaluated and treated with SCS using an implanted paddle lead within the dorsal thoracic epidural space. Baseline LBP, and if present LE pain, were recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at an initial evaluation. At a follow-up visit (a minimum of 12 months later), LBP and LE pain after a spinal cord stimulator implantation were again recorded using the VAS. Patients were also asked to estimate total LBP pain relief achieved. RESULTS: Patients with either exclusive (n=7) or predominant (n=2) axial LBP were treated with SCS by implantation of a paddle lead at an average spine level of T9. The baseline VAS score for LBP was 7.2; after a follow-up of 20 months, the score decreased to 2.3 (P=0.003). The LE pain VAS score decreased from 7.5 to 0.0 (P=0.103). Patients also reported a subjective 66.4% decrease of their LBP at follow-up. There were no surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Axial LBP is refractory to many treatments, including SCS. SCS using a surgically implanted paddle electrode provides significant pain relief for chronic axial LPB, and is a safe treatment modality. Dove Medical Press 2014-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4136982/ /pubmed/25143753 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S66414 Text en © 2014 Stidd et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Stidd, David A
Rivero, Sergio
Weinand, Martin E
Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain
title Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain
title_full Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain
title_fullStr Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain
title_short Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain
title_sort spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4136982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143753
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S66414
work_keys_str_mv AT stidddavida spinalcordstimulationwithimplantedepiduralpaddleleadrelieveschronicaxiallowbackpain
AT riverosergio spinalcordstimulationwithimplantedepiduralpaddleleadrelieveschronicaxiallowbackpain
AT weinandmartine spinalcordstimulationwithimplantedepiduralpaddleleadrelieveschronicaxiallowbackpain