Cargando…

Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort

BACKGROUND: Rural communities have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors than urban communities. In Sweden, socioeconomic transition and urbanization have led to decreased populations in rural areas and changing characteristics of the remaining inhabitants. We investigated the risk factors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindroth, Martin, Lundqvist, Robert, Lilja, Mikael, Eliasson, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25106746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-825
_version_ 1782331065469239296
author Lindroth, Martin
Lundqvist, Robert
Lilja, Mikael
Eliasson, Mats
author_facet Lindroth, Martin
Lundqvist, Robert
Lilja, Mikael
Eliasson, Mats
author_sort Lindroth, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rural communities have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors than urban communities. In Sweden, socioeconomic transition and urbanization have led to decreased populations in rural areas and changing characteristics of the remaining inhabitants. We investigated the risk factors in urban and rural populations in Northern Sweden. METHODS: The 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA Study invited a random sample of 2,500 people, 25 to 74 years and 69.2% participated. Community size was classified as rural = <1,000 inhabitants, town = 1,000-15,000, or urban/city= >15,000. We adjusted our analysis for age, gender and education. RESULTS: The rural population was older and the proportion of men was higher than in the urban areas. Having only primary education was more common in rural areas than in urban areas (26.2% vs. 12.3%). Waist and hip circumference, body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels were higher in rural areas than in urban areas, even after adjusting for differences in age and gender. The largest differences between rural and urban dwellers were seen in waist circumference of women (4.8 cm), BMI of women (1.8 units) and cholesterol of men (0.37 mmol/l). Blood pressure was higher in rural areas, but not after adjusting for age and gender. Participants in rural areas were more often treated for hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, hospitalized for myocardial infarction and diagnosed with diabetes. However, after adjusting for age and gender, there were no differences. The odds ratio for being physically active comparing rural areas to urban areas was 0.73 (95% CI 0.53; 1.01). Smoking, snuff use and the prevalence of pathological glucose tolerance did not differ between community sizes. Middle-sized communities often had values in between those found in rural and urban communities, but overall they were more similar to the rural population. Further adjustment for education did not change the results for any variable. CONCLUSIONS: In 2009 the rural population in northern Sweden was older, with less education, higher BMI, more sedentary lifestyle, and had higher cholesterol levels than the urban population. The rural population should be considered targets for focused preventive interventions, but with due consideration of the socioeconomic and cultural context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4137065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41370652014-08-19 Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort Lindroth, Martin Lundqvist, Robert Lilja, Mikael Eliasson, Mats BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Rural communities have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors than urban communities. In Sweden, socioeconomic transition and urbanization have led to decreased populations in rural areas and changing characteristics of the remaining inhabitants. We investigated the risk factors in urban and rural populations in Northern Sweden. METHODS: The 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA Study invited a random sample of 2,500 people, 25 to 74 years and 69.2% participated. Community size was classified as rural = <1,000 inhabitants, town = 1,000-15,000, or urban/city= >15,000. We adjusted our analysis for age, gender and education. RESULTS: The rural population was older and the proportion of men was higher than in the urban areas. Having only primary education was more common in rural areas than in urban areas (26.2% vs. 12.3%). Waist and hip circumference, body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels were higher in rural areas than in urban areas, even after adjusting for differences in age and gender. The largest differences between rural and urban dwellers were seen in waist circumference of women (4.8 cm), BMI of women (1.8 units) and cholesterol of men (0.37 mmol/l). Blood pressure was higher in rural areas, but not after adjusting for age and gender. Participants in rural areas were more often treated for hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, hospitalized for myocardial infarction and diagnosed with diabetes. However, after adjusting for age and gender, there were no differences. The odds ratio for being physically active comparing rural areas to urban areas was 0.73 (95% CI 0.53; 1.01). Smoking, snuff use and the prevalence of pathological glucose tolerance did not differ between community sizes. Middle-sized communities often had values in between those found in rural and urban communities, but overall they were more similar to the rural population. Further adjustment for education did not change the results for any variable. CONCLUSIONS: In 2009 the rural population in northern Sweden was older, with less education, higher BMI, more sedentary lifestyle, and had higher cholesterol levels than the urban population. The rural population should be considered targets for focused preventive interventions, but with due consideration of the socioeconomic and cultural context. BioMed Central 2014-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4137065/ /pubmed/25106746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-825 Text en © Lindroth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lindroth, Martin
Lundqvist, Robert
Lilja, Mikael
Eliasson, Mats
Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort
title Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort
title_full Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort
title_fullStr Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort
title_short Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort
title_sort cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban sweden: the 2009 northern sweden monica cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25106746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-825
work_keys_str_mv AT lindrothmartin cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort
AT lundqvistrobert cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort
AT liljamikael cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort
AT eliassonmats cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort