Cargando…
Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort
BACKGROUND: Rural communities have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors than urban communities. In Sweden, socioeconomic transition and urbanization have led to decreased populations in rural areas and changing characteristics of the remaining inhabitants. We investigated the risk factors...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25106746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-825 |
_version_ | 1782331065469239296 |
---|---|
author | Lindroth, Martin Lundqvist, Robert Lilja, Mikael Eliasson, Mats |
author_facet | Lindroth, Martin Lundqvist, Robert Lilja, Mikael Eliasson, Mats |
author_sort | Lindroth, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rural communities have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors than urban communities. In Sweden, socioeconomic transition and urbanization have led to decreased populations in rural areas and changing characteristics of the remaining inhabitants. We investigated the risk factors in urban and rural populations in Northern Sweden. METHODS: The 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA Study invited a random sample of 2,500 people, 25 to 74 years and 69.2% participated. Community size was classified as rural = <1,000 inhabitants, town = 1,000-15,000, or urban/city= >15,000. We adjusted our analysis for age, gender and education. RESULTS: The rural population was older and the proportion of men was higher than in the urban areas. Having only primary education was more common in rural areas than in urban areas (26.2% vs. 12.3%). Waist and hip circumference, body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels were higher in rural areas than in urban areas, even after adjusting for differences in age and gender. The largest differences between rural and urban dwellers were seen in waist circumference of women (4.8 cm), BMI of women (1.8 units) and cholesterol of men (0.37 mmol/l). Blood pressure was higher in rural areas, but not after adjusting for age and gender. Participants in rural areas were more often treated for hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, hospitalized for myocardial infarction and diagnosed with diabetes. However, after adjusting for age and gender, there were no differences. The odds ratio for being physically active comparing rural areas to urban areas was 0.73 (95% CI 0.53; 1.01). Smoking, snuff use and the prevalence of pathological glucose tolerance did not differ between community sizes. Middle-sized communities often had values in between those found in rural and urban communities, but overall they were more similar to the rural population. Further adjustment for education did not change the results for any variable. CONCLUSIONS: In 2009 the rural population in northern Sweden was older, with less education, higher BMI, more sedentary lifestyle, and had higher cholesterol levels than the urban population. The rural population should be considered targets for focused preventive interventions, but with due consideration of the socioeconomic and cultural context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4137065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41370652014-08-19 Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort Lindroth, Martin Lundqvist, Robert Lilja, Mikael Eliasson, Mats BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Rural communities have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors than urban communities. In Sweden, socioeconomic transition and urbanization have led to decreased populations in rural areas and changing characteristics of the remaining inhabitants. We investigated the risk factors in urban and rural populations in Northern Sweden. METHODS: The 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA Study invited a random sample of 2,500 people, 25 to 74 years and 69.2% participated. Community size was classified as rural = <1,000 inhabitants, town = 1,000-15,000, or urban/city= >15,000. We adjusted our analysis for age, gender and education. RESULTS: The rural population was older and the proportion of men was higher than in the urban areas. Having only primary education was more common in rural areas than in urban areas (26.2% vs. 12.3%). Waist and hip circumference, body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels were higher in rural areas than in urban areas, even after adjusting for differences in age and gender. The largest differences between rural and urban dwellers were seen in waist circumference of women (4.8 cm), BMI of women (1.8 units) and cholesterol of men (0.37 mmol/l). Blood pressure was higher in rural areas, but not after adjusting for age and gender. Participants in rural areas were more often treated for hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, hospitalized for myocardial infarction and diagnosed with diabetes. However, after adjusting for age and gender, there were no differences. The odds ratio for being physically active comparing rural areas to urban areas was 0.73 (95% CI 0.53; 1.01). Smoking, snuff use and the prevalence of pathological glucose tolerance did not differ between community sizes. Middle-sized communities often had values in between those found in rural and urban communities, but overall they were more similar to the rural population. Further adjustment for education did not change the results for any variable. CONCLUSIONS: In 2009 the rural population in northern Sweden was older, with less education, higher BMI, more sedentary lifestyle, and had higher cholesterol levels than the urban population. The rural population should be considered targets for focused preventive interventions, but with due consideration of the socioeconomic and cultural context. BioMed Central 2014-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4137065/ /pubmed/25106746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-825 Text en © Lindroth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lindroth, Martin Lundqvist, Robert Lilja, Mikael Eliasson, Mats Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort |
title | Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort |
title_full | Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort |
title_fullStr | Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort |
title_short | Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort |
title_sort | cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban sweden: the 2009 northern sweden monica cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25106746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindrothmartin cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort AT lundqvistrobert cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort AT liljamikael cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort AT eliassonmats cardiovascularriskfactorsdifferbetweenruralandurbanswedenthe2009northernswedenmonicacohort |