Cargando…

Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results

Purpose. To compare functional results in two cohorts of patients undergoing epithelium-off pulsed (pl-ACXL) and continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (cl-ACXL) with dextran-free riboflavin solution and high-fluence ultraviolet A irradiation. Design. It is a prospective, compara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzotta, Cosimo, Traversi, Claudio, Paradiso, Anna Lucia, Latronico, Maria Eugenia, Rechichi, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/604731
_version_ 1782331120486973440
author Mazzotta, Cosimo
Traversi, Claudio
Paradiso, Anna Lucia
Latronico, Maria Eugenia
Rechichi, Miguel
author_facet Mazzotta, Cosimo
Traversi, Claudio
Paradiso, Anna Lucia
Latronico, Maria Eugenia
Rechichi, Miguel
author_sort Mazzotta, Cosimo
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To compare functional results in two cohorts of patients undergoing epithelium-off pulsed (pl-ACXL) and continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (cl-ACXL) with dextran-free riboflavin solution and high-fluence ultraviolet A irradiation. Design. It is a prospective, comparative, and interventional clinical study. Methods. 20 patients affected by progressive keratoconus were enrolled in the study. 10 eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off pl-ACXL by the KXL UV-A source (Avedro Inc., Waltham, MS, USA) with 8 minutes (1 sec. on/1 sec. off) of UV-A exposure at 30 mW/cm(2) and energy dose of 7.2 J/cm(2); 10 eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off cl-ACXL at 30 mW/cm(2) for 4 minutes. Riboflavin 0.1% dextran-free solution was used for a 10-minutes corneal soaking. Patients underwent clinical examination of uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), corneal topography and aberrometry (CSO EyeTop, Florence, Italy), corneal OCT optical pachymetry (Cirrus OCT, Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), endothelial cells count (I-Conan Non Co Robot), and in vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy (Heidelberg, Germany) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Results. Functional results one year after cl-ACXL and pl-ACXL demonstrated keratoconus stability in both groups. Functional outcomes were found to be better in epithelium-off pulsed light accelerated treatment together with showing a deeper stromal penetration. No endothelial damage was recorded during the follow-up in both groups. Conclusions. The study confirmed that oxygen represents the main driver of collagen crosslinking reaction. Pulsed light treatment optimized intraoperative oxygen availability improving postoperative functional outcomes compared with continuous light treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4137545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41375452014-08-27 Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results Mazzotta, Cosimo Traversi, Claudio Paradiso, Anna Lucia Latronico, Maria Eugenia Rechichi, Miguel J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To compare functional results in two cohorts of patients undergoing epithelium-off pulsed (pl-ACXL) and continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (cl-ACXL) with dextran-free riboflavin solution and high-fluence ultraviolet A irradiation. Design. It is a prospective, comparative, and interventional clinical study. Methods. 20 patients affected by progressive keratoconus were enrolled in the study. 10 eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off pl-ACXL by the KXL UV-A source (Avedro Inc., Waltham, MS, USA) with 8 minutes (1 sec. on/1 sec. off) of UV-A exposure at 30 mW/cm(2) and energy dose of 7.2 J/cm(2); 10 eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off cl-ACXL at 30 mW/cm(2) for 4 minutes. Riboflavin 0.1% dextran-free solution was used for a 10-minutes corneal soaking. Patients underwent clinical examination of uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), corneal topography and aberrometry (CSO EyeTop, Florence, Italy), corneal OCT optical pachymetry (Cirrus OCT, Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), endothelial cells count (I-Conan Non Co Robot), and in vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy (Heidelberg, Germany) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Results. Functional results one year after cl-ACXL and pl-ACXL demonstrated keratoconus stability in both groups. Functional outcomes were found to be better in epithelium-off pulsed light accelerated treatment together with showing a deeper stromal penetration. No endothelial damage was recorded during the follow-up in both groups. Conclusions. The study confirmed that oxygen represents the main driver of collagen crosslinking reaction. Pulsed light treatment optimized intraoperative oxygen availability improving postoperative functional outcomes compared with continuous light treatment. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4137545/ /pubmed/25165576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/604731 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cosimo Mazzotta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Mazzotta, Cosimo
Traversi, Claudio
Paradiso, Anna Lucia
Latronico, Maria Eugenia
Rechichi, Miguel
Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results
title Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results
title_full Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results
title_fullStr Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results
title_short Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results
title_sort pulsed light accelerated crosslinking versus continuous light accelerated crosslinking: one-year results
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/604731
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzottacosimo pulsedlightacceleratedcrosslinkingversuscontinuouslightacceleratedcrosslinkingoneyearresults
AT traversiclaudio pulsedlightacceleratedcrosslinkingversuscontinuouslightacceleratedcrosslinkingoneyearresults
AT paradisoannalucia pulsedlightacceleratedcrosslinkingversuscontinuouslightacceleratedcrosslinkingoneyearresults
AT latronicomariaeugenia pulsedlightacceleratedcrosslinkingversuscontinuouslightacceleratedcrosslinkingoneyearresults
AT rechichimiguel pulsedlightacceleratedcrosslinkingversuscontinuouslightacceleratedcrosslinkingoneyearresults