Cargando…

Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism

Wolbachia are maternally transmitted endosymbionts that often alter their arthropod hosts’ biology to favor the success of infected females, and they may also serve as a speciation microbe driving reproductive isolation. Two of these host manipulations include killing males outright and reducing off...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metcalf, Jason A., Jo, Minhee, Bordenstein, Sarah R., Jaenike, John, Bordenstein, Seth R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165636
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.529
_version_ 1782331138102001664
author Metcalf, Jason A.
Jo, Minhee
Bordenstein, Sarah R.
Jaenike, John
Bordenstein, Seth R.
author_facet Metcalf, Jason A.
Jo, Minhee
Bordenstein, Sarah R.
Jaenike, John
Bordenstein, Seth R.
author_sort Metcalf, Jason A.
collection PubMed
description Wolbachia are maternally transmitted endosymbionts that often alter their arthropod hosts’ biology to favor the success of infected females, and they may also serve as a speciation microbe driving reproductive isolation. Two of these host manipulations include killing males outright and reducing offspring survival when infected males mate with uninfected females, a phenomenon known as cytoplasmic incompatibility. Little is known about the mechanisms behind these phenotypes, but interestingly either effect can be caused by the same Wolbachia strain when infecting different hosts. For instance, wRec causes cytoplasmic incompatibility in its native host Drosophila recens and male killing in D. subquinaria. The discovery of prophage WO elements in most arthropod Wolbachia has generated the hypothesis that WO may encode genes involved in these reproductive manipulations. However, PCR screens for the WO minor capsid gene indicated that wRec lacks phage WO. Thus, wRec seemed to provide an example where phage WO is not needed for Wolbachia-induced reproductive manipulation. To enable investigation of the mechanism of phenotype switching in different host backgrounds, and to examine the unexpected absence of phage WO, we sequenced the genome of wRec. Analyses reveal that wRec diverged from wMel approximately 350,000 years ago, mainly by genome reduction in the phage regions. While it lost the minor capsid gene used in standard PCR screens for phage WO, it retained two regions encompassing 33 genes, several of which have previously been associated with reproductive parasitism. Thus, WO gene involvement in reproductive manipulation cannot be excluded and reliance on single gene PCR should not be used to rule out the presence of phage WO in Wolbachia. Additionally, the genome sequence for wRec will enable transcriptomic and proteomic studies that may help elucidate the Wolbachia mechanisms of altered reproductive manipulations associated with host switching, perhaps among the 33 remaining phage genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4137656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41376562014-08-27 Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism Metcalf, Jason A. Jo, Minhee Bordenstein, Sarah R. Jaenike, John Bordenstein, Seth R. PeerJ Evolutionary Studies Wolbachia are maternally transmitted endosymbionts that often alter their arthropod hosts’ biology to favor the success of infected females, and they may also serve as a speciation microbe driving reproductive isolation. Two of these host manipulations include killing males outright and reducing offspring survival when infected males mate with uninfected females, a phenomenon known as cytoplasmic incompatibility. Little is known about the mechanisms behind these phenotypes, but interestingly either effect can be caused by the same Wolbachia strain when infecting different hosts. For instance, wRec causes cytoplasmic incompatibility in its native host Drosophila recens and male killing in D. subquinaria. The discovery of prophage WO elements in most arthropod Wolbachia has generated the hypothesis that WO may encode genes involved in these reproductive manipulations. However, PCR screens for the WO minor capsid gene indicated that wRec lacks phage WO. Thus, wRec seemed to provide an example where phage WO is not needed for Wolbachia-induced reproductive manipulation. To enable investigation of the mechanism of phenotype switching in different host backgrounds, and to examine the unexpected absence of phage WO, we sequenced the genome of wRec. Analyses reveal that wRec diverged from wMel approximately 350,000 years ago, mainly by genome reduction in the phage regions. While it lost the minor capsid gene used in standard PCR screens for phage WO, it retained two regions encompassing 33 genes, several of which have previously been associated with reproductive parasitism. Thus, WO gene involvement in reproductive manipulation cannot be excluded and reliance on single gene PCR should not be used to rule out the presence of phage WO in Wolbachia. Additionally, the genome sequence for wRec will enable transcriptomic and proteomic studies that may help elucidate the Wolbachia mechanisms of altered reproductive manipulations associated with host switching, perhaps among the 33 remaining phage genes. PeerJ Inc. 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4137656/ /pubmed/25165636 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.529 Text en © 2014 Metcalf et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Evolutionary Studies
Metcalf, Jason A.
Jo, Minhee
Bordenstein, Sarah R.
Jaenike, John
Bordenstein, Seth R.
Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism
title Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism
title_full Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism
title_fullStr Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism
title_full_unstemmed Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism
title_short Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism
title_sort recent genome reduction of wolbachia in drosophila recens targets phage wo and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism
topic Evolutionary Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165636
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.529
work_keys_str_mv AT metcalfjasona recentgenomereductionofwolbachiaindrosophilarecenstargetsphagewoandnarrowscandidatesforreproductiveparasitism
AT jominhee recentgenomereductionofwolbachiaindrosophilarecenstargetsphagewoandnarrowscandidatesforreproductiveparasitism
AT bordensteinsarahr recentgenomereductionofwolbachiaindrosophilarecenstargetsphagewoandnarrowscandidatesforreproductiveparasitism
AT jaenikejohn recentgenomereductionofwolbachiaindrosophilarecenstargetsphagewoandnarrowscandidatesforreproductiveparasitism
AT bordensteinsethr recentgenomereductionofwolbachiaindrosophilarecenstargetsphagewoandnarrowscandidatesforreproductiveparasitism