Cargando…

The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND: The symptomatology after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is complex as symptoms are subjective and nonspecific. It is important to differentiate symptoms as neurologically based or caused by noninjury factors. Symptom exaggeration has been found to influence postinjury presentation, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Provance, Aaron J., Terhune, E. Bailey, Cooley, Christine, Carry, Patrick M., Connery, Amy K., Engelman, Glenn H., Kirkwood, Michael W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738114544444
_version_ 1782331144063156224
author Provance, Aaron J.
Terhune, E. Bailey
Cooley, Christine
Carry, Patrick M.
Connery, Amy K.
Engelman, Glenn H.
Kirkwood, Michael W.
author_facet Provance, Aaron J.
Terhune, E. Bailey
Cooley, Christine
Carry, Patrick M.
Connery, Amy K.
Engelman, Glenn H.
Kirkwood, Michael W.
author_sort Provance, Aaron J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The symptomatology after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is complex as symptoms are subjective and nonspecific. It is important to differentiate symptoms as neurologically based or caused by noninjury factors. Symptom exaggeration has been found to influence postinjury presentation, and objective validity tests are used to help differentiate these cases. This study examines how concussed patients seen for initial medical workup may present with noncredible effort during follow-up neuropsychological examination and identifies physical findings during evaluation that best predict noncredible performance. HYPOTHESIS: A portion of pediatric patients will demonstrate noncredible effort during neuropsychological testing after mTBI, predicted by failure of certain vestibular and cognitive tests during initial examination. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Participants (n = 80) underwent evaluation by a sports medicine physician ≤3 months from injury, were subsequently seen for a neuropsychological examination, and completed the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT). Variables included results of a mental status examination (orientation), serial 7s examination, Romberg test, and heel-to-toe walking test. The primary outcome variable of interest was pass/fail of the MSVT. RESULTS: Of the participants, 51% were male and 49% were female. Eighteen of 80 (23%) failed the MSVT. Based on univariable logistic regression analysis, the outcomes of the Romberg test (P = 0.0037) and heel-to-toe walking test(P = 0.0066) were identified as significant independent predictors of MSVT failure. In a multivariable model, outcome of Romberg test was the only significant predictor of MSVT failure. The probability of MSVT failure was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.3% to 88.9%) when a subject failed the Romberg test. CONCLUSION: A meaningful percentage of pediatric subjects present evidence of noncredible performance during neuropsychological examination after mTBI. Initial examination findings in some cases may represent symptom exaggeration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4137681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41376812015-09-01 The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Provance, Aaron J. Terhune, E. Bailey Cooley, Christine Carry, Patrick M. Connery, Amy K. Engelman, Glenn H. Kirkwood, Michael W. Sports Health Primary Care BACKGROUND: The symptomatology after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is complex as symptoms are subjective and nonspecific. It is important to differentiate symptoms as neurologically based or caused by noninjury factors. Symptom exaggeration has been found to influence postinjury presentation, and objective validity tests are used to help differentiate these cases. This study examines how concussed patients seen for initial medical workup may present with noncredible effort during follow-up neuropsychological examination and identifies physical findings during evaluation that best predict noncredible performance. HYPOTHESIS: A portion of pediatric patients will demonstrate noncredible effort during neuropsychological testing after mTBI, predicted by failure of certain vestibular and cognitive tests during initial examination. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Participants (n = 80) underwent evaluation by a sports medicine physician ≤3 months from injury, were subsequently seen for a neuropsychological examination, and completed the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT). Variables included results of a mental status examination (orientation), serial 7s examination, Romberg test, and heel-to-toe walking test. The primary outcome variable of interest was pass/fail of the MSVT. RESULTS: Of the participants, 51% were male and 49% were female. Eighteen of 80 (23%) failed the MSVT. Based on univariable logistic regression analysis, the outcomes of the Romberg test (P = 0.0037) and heel-to-toe walking test(P = 0.0066) were identified as significant independent predictors of MSVT failure. In a multivariable model, outcome of Romberg test was the only significant predictor of MSVT failure. The probability of MSVT failure was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.3% to 88.9%) when a subject failed the Romberg test. CONCLUSION: A meaningful percentage of pediatric subjects present evidence of noncredible performance during neuropsychological examination after mTBI. Initial examination findings in some cases may represent symptom exaggeration. SAGE Publications 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4137681/ /pubmed/25177417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738114544444 Text en © 2014 The Author(s)
spellingShingle Primary Care
Provance, Aaron J.
Terhune, E. Bailey
Cooley, Christine
Carry, Patrick M.
Connery, Amy K.
Engelman, Glenn H.
Kirkwood, Michael W.
The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
title The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
title_full The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
title_fullStr The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
title_short The Relationship Between Initial Physical Examination Findings and Failure on Objective Validity Testing During Neuropsychological Evaluation After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
title_sort relationship between initial physical examination findings and failure on objective validity testing during neuropsychological evaluation after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury
topic Primary Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738114544444
work_keys_str_mv AT provanceaaronj therelationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT terhuneebailey therelationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT cooleychristine therelationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT carrypatrickm therelationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT conneryamyk therelationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT engelmanglennh therelationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT kirkwoodmichaelw therelationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT provanceaaronj relationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT terhuneebailey relationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT cooleychristine relationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT carrypatrickm relationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT conneryamyk relationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT engelmanglennh relationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT kirkwoodmichaelw relationshipbetweeninitialphysicalexaminationfindingsandfailureonobjectivevaliditytestingduringneuropsychologicalevaluationafterpediatricmildtraumaticbraininjury