Cargando…

Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)

The purpose of this study was to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure of terrestrial annelids. This paper describes the tissue reactions of the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, to five different types of suture materials in order to determine which suture materi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salgado, Melissa A, Lewbart, Gregory A, Christian, Larry S, Griffith, Emily H, Law, Jerry McHugh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-423
_version_ 1782331215723888640
author Salgado, Melissa A
Lewbart, Gregory A
Christian, Larry S
Griffith, Emily H
Law, Jerry McHugh
author_facet Salgado, Melissa A
Lewbart, Gregory A
Christian, Larry S
Griffith, Emily H
Law, Jerry McHugh
author_sort Salgado, Melissa A
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure of terrestrial annelids. This paper describes the tissue reactions of the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, to five different types of suture materials in order to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure. Silk, monofilament nylon, polydiaxonone, polyglactin 910, and chromic gut were studied. There was mild to moderate tissue reaction to all five suture materials. In all of the biopsies wound-healing reaction consisted of aggregates of blastemal cells which appeared in various stages of dedifferentiation from the body wall. Inflammatory cells infiltrated the wound sites, reminiscent of the typical foreign body reaction in vertebrates. The results indicate polyglactin 910 would be the best suture material with regards to tissue security and reaction scores. Chromic gut occupies the next position but there were problems with suture security over time. This appears to be the first suture material performance study on a terrestrial invertebrate. The earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, was chosen for its wide availability, size, and the extensive species knowledge base. The earthworm may prove to be a good surgical/suture model for economically important invertebrates such as mollusks, tunicates, and insect larval stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4138315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41383152014-08-20 Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) Salgado, Melissa A Lewbart, Gregory A Christian, Larry S Griffith, Emily H Law, Jerry McHugh Springerplus Research The purpose of this study was to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure of terrestrial annelids. This paper describes the tissue reactions of the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, to five different types of suture materials in order to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure. Silk, monofilament nylon, polydiaxonone, polyglactin 910, and chromic gut were studied. There was mild to moderate tissue reaction to all five suture materials. In all of the biopsies wound-healing reaction consisted of aggregates of blastemal cells which appeared in various stages of dedifferentiation from the body wall. Inflammatory cells infiltrated the wound sites, reminiscent of the typical foreign body reaction in vertebrates. The results indicate polyglactin 910 would be the best suture material with regards to tissue security and reaction scores. Chromic gut occupies the next position but there were problems with suture security over time. This appears to be the first suture material performance study on a terrestrial invertebrate. The earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, was chosen for its wide availability, size, and the extensive species knowledge base. The earthworm may prove to be a good surgical/suture model for economically important invertebrates such as mollusks, tunicates, and insect larval stages. Springer International Publishing 2014-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4138315/ /pubmed/25143875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-423 Text en © Salgado et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Salgado, Melissa A
Lewbart, Gregory A
Christian, Larry S
Griffith, Emily H
Law, Jerry McHugh
Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)
title Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)
title_full Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)
title_fullStr Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)
title_short Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)
title_sort evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (lumbricus terrestris)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-423
work_keys_str_mv AT salgadomelissaa evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris
AT lewbartgregorya evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris
AT christianlarrys evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris
AT griffithemilyh evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris
AT lawjerrymchugh evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris