Cargando…
Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris)
The purpose of this study was to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure of terrestrial annelids. This paper describes the tissue reactions of the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, to five different types of suture materials in order to determine which suture materi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-423 |
_version_ | 1782331215723888640 |
---|---|
author | Salgado, Melissa A Lewbart, Gregory A Christian, Larry S Griffith, Emily H Law, Jerry McHugh |
author_facet | Salgado, Melissa A Lewbart, Gregory A Christian, Larry S Griffith, Emily H Law, Jerry McHugh |
author_sort | Salgado, Melissa A |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure of terrestrial annelids. This paper describes the tissue reactions of the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, to five different types of suture materials in order to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure. Silk, monofilament nylon, polydiaxonone, polyglactin 910, and chromic gut were studied. There was mild to moderate tissue reaction to all five suture materials. In all of the biopsies wound-healing reaction consisted of aggregates of blastemal cells which appeared in various stages of dedifferentiation from the body wall. Inflammatory cells infiltrated the wound sites, reminiscent of the typical foreign body reaction in vertebrates. The results indicate polyglactin 910 would be the best suture material with regards to tissue security and reaction scores. Chromic gut occupies the next position but there were problems with suture security over time. This appears to be the first suture material performance study on a terrestrial invertebrate. The earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, was chosen for its wide availability, size, and the extensive species knowledge base. The earthworm may prove to be a good surgical/suture model for economically important invertebrates such as mollusks, tunicates, and insect larval stages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4138315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41383152014-08-20 Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) Salgado, Melissa A Lewbart, Gregory A Christian, Larry S Griffith, Emily H Law, Jerry McHugh Springerplus Research The purpose of this study was to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure of terrestrial annelids. This paper describes the tissue reactions of the earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, to five different types of suture materials in order to determine which suture material is the most appropriate for dermal closure. Silk, monofilament nylon, polydiaxonone, polyglactin 910, and chromic gut were studied. There was mild to moderate tissue reaction to all five suture materials. In all of the biopsies wound-healing reaction consisted of aggregates of blastemal cells which appeared in various stages of dedifferentiation from the body wall. Inflammatory cells infiltrated the wound sites, reminiscent of the typical foreign body reaction in vertebrates. The results indicate polyglactin 910 would be the best suture material with regards to tissue security and reaction scores. Chromic gut occupies the next position but there were problems with suture security over time. This appears to be the first suture material performance study on a terrestrial invertebrate. The earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, was chosen for its wide availability, size, and the extensive species knowledge base. The earthworm may prove to be a good surgical/suture model for economically important invertebrates such as mollusks, tunicates, and insect larval stages. Springer International Publishing 2014-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4138315/ /pubmed/25143875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-423 Text en © Salgado et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Salgado, Melissa A Lewbart, Gregory A Christian, Larry S Griffith, Emily H Law, Jerry McHugh Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) |
title | Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) |
title_full | Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) |
title_short | Evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) |
title_sort | evaluation of five different suture materials in the skin of the earthworm (lumbricus terrestris) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salgadomelissaa evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris AT lewbartgregorya evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris AT christianlarrys evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris AT griffithemilyh evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris AT lawjerrymchugh evaluationoffivedifferentsuturematerialsintheskinoftheearthwormlumbricusterrestris |