Cargando…

Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences

BACKGROUND: Patients’ treatment preferences are often cited as barriers to recruitment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We investigated how RCT recruiters reacted to patients’ treatment preferences and identified key strategies to improve informed decision-making and trial recruitment. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mills, Nicola, Blazeby, Jane M, Hamdy, Freddie C, Neal, David E, Campbell, Bruce, Wilson, Caroline, Paramasivan, Sangeetha, Donovan, Jenny L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-323
_version_ 1782331226468646912
author Mills, Nicola
Blazeby, Jane M
Hamdy, Freddie C
Neal, David E
Campbell, Bruce
Wilson, Caroline
Paramasivan, Sangeetha
Donovan, Jenny L
author_facet Mills, Nicola
Blazeby, Jane M
Hamdy, Freddie C
Neal, David E
Campbell, Bruce
Wilson, Caroline
Paramasivan, Sangeetha
Donovan, Jenny L
author_sort Mills, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients’ treatment preferences are often cited as barriers to recruitment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We investigated how RCT recruiters reacted to patients’ treatment preferences and identified key strategies to improve informed decision-making and trial recruitment. METHODS: Audio-recordings of 103 RCT recruitment appointments with 96 participants in three UK multicenter pragmatic RCTs were analyzed using content and thematic analysis. Recruiters’ responses to expressed treatment preferences were assessed in one RCT (ProtecT - Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) in which training on exploring preferences had been given, and compared with two other RCTs where this specific training had not been given. RESULTS: Recruiters elicited treatment preferences similarly in all RCTs but responses to expressed preferences differed substantially. In the ProtecT RCT, patients’ preferences were not accepted at face value but were explored and discussed at length in three key ways: eliciting and acknowledging the preference rationale, balancing treatment views, and emphasizing the need to keep an open mind and consider all treatments. By exploring preferences, recruiters enabled participants to become clearer about whether their views were robust enough to be sustained or were sufficiently weak that participation in the RCT became possible. Conversely, in the other RCTs, treatment preferences were often readily accepted without further discussion or understanding the reasoning behind them, suggesting that patients were not given the opportunity to fully consider all treatments and trial participation. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiters can be trained to elicit and address patients’ treatment preferences, enabling those who may not have considered trial participation to do so. Without specific guidance, some RCT recruiters are likely to accept initial preferences at face value, missing opportunities to promote more informed decision-making. Training interventions for recruiters that incorporate key strategies to manage treatment preferences, as in the ProtecT study, are required to facilitate recruitment and informed consent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ProtecT RCT: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297. The other two trials are registered but have asked to be anonymized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4138384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41383842014-08-21 Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences Mills, Nicola Blazeby, Jane M Hamdy, Freddie C Neal, David E Campbell, Bruce Wilson, Caroline Paramasivan, Sangeetha Donovan, Jenny L Trials Research BACKGROUND: Patients’ treatment preferences are often cited as barriers to recruitment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We investigated how RCT recruiters reacted to patients’ treatment preferences and identified key strategies to improve informed decision-making and trial recruitment. METHODS: Audio-recordings of 103 RCT recruitment appointments with 96 participants in three UK multicenter pragmatic RCTs were analyzed using content and thematic analysis. Recruiters’ responses to expressed treatment preferences were assessed in one RCT (ProtecT - Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) in which training on exploring preferences had been given, and compared with two other RCTs where this specific training had not been given. RESULTS: Recruiters elicited treatment preferences similarly in all RCTs but responses to expressed preferences differed substantially. In the ProtecT RCT, patients’ preferences were not accepted at face value but were explored and discussed at length in three key ways: eliciting and acknowledging the preference rationale, balancing treatment views, and emphasizing the need to keep an open mind and consider all treatments. By exploring preferences, recruiters enabled participants to become clearer about whether their views were robust enough to be sustained or were sufficiently weak that participation in the RCT became possible. Conversely, in the other RCTs, treatment preferences were often readily accepted without further discussion or understanding the reasoning behind them, suggesting that patients were not given the opportunity to fully consider all treatments and trial participation. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiters can be trained to elicit and address patients’ treatment preferences, enabling those who may not have considered trial participation to do so. Without specific guidance, some RCT recruiters are likely to accept initial preferences at face value, missing opportunities to promote more informed decision-making. Training interventions for recruiters that incorporate key strategies to manage treatment preferences, as in the ProtecT study, are required to facilitate recruitment and informed consent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ProtecT RCT: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297. The other two trials are registered but have asked to be anonymized. BioMed Central 2014-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4138384/ /pubmed/25115160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-323 Text en © Mills et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mills, Nicola
Blazeby, Jane M
Hamdy, Freddie C
Neal, David E
Campbell, Bruce
Wilson, Caroline
Paramasivan, Sangeetha
Donovan, Jenny L
Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
title Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
title_full Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
title_fullStr Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
title_full_unstemmed Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
title_short Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
title_sort training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-323
work_keys_str_mv AT millsnicola trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences
AT blazebyjanem trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences
AT hamdyfreddiec trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences
AT nealdavide trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences
AT campbellbruce trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences
AT wilsoncaroline trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences
AT paramasivansangeetha trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences
AT donovanjennyl trainingrecruiterstorandomizedtrialstofacilitaterecruitmentandinformedconsentbyexploringpatientstreatmentpreferences