Cargando…

Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects of two distalizing protocols featuring different anchorage systems used in patients with class II malocclusion: the MGBM system (skeletal anchorage) and Pendulum (intraoral anchorage). METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mariani, Lisa, Maino, Giuliano, Caprioglio, Alberto
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0043-z

Ejemplares similares

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review
por: Alhammadi, Maged S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Maxillary molar distalization with MGBM-system in class II malocclusion
por: Maino, Giuliano, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Features in Patients with Deep Overbite Malocclusion
por: Fattahi, Hamidreza, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Dentoalveolar compensation in different anterioposterior and vertical skeletal malocclusions
por: Alhammadi, Maged-Sultan
Publicado: (2019)

Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Batista, Klaus Barretto dos Santos Lopes, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage
por: Celikoglu, Mevlut, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Bimaxillary Distalization with Skeletal Anchorage for Management of Severe Skeletal Class III Open Bite Malocclusion
por: Alshehri, Abdulrahman
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes in Patients With Class II Div 1 Malocclusion Treated With Twin Block Appliance
por: Gandhi, Vaibhav, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correlation between Dentoalveolar Heights and Vertical Skeletal Patterns in Class I Malocclusion in Ethnic Javanese
por: Ardani, I. Gusti Aju Wahju, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
por: Fakharian, Mehrnaz, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid maxillary expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class III patients: a retrospective follow-up study
por: Maino, Giuliano B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Severe skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion in postpubertal girl treated using Forsus with miniplate anchorage
por: Patil, Harshal Ashok, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Dentoalveolar class III treatment using retromolar miniscrew anchorage
por: Poletti, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effectiveness of interceptive treatment of class III malocclusions with skeletal anchorage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Rodríguez de Guzmán-Barrera, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Non-extraction treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion
por: Jain, Abhay K., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern
por: Plaza, Sonia Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Zygomatic miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion: A controlled clinical trial
por: Bozkaya, Erdal, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion
por: Liang, Shuran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Analysis of Nasal Morphology in Skeletal Class I and Skeletal Class II Malocclusion: An Observational Study
por: Rathi, Shruti, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
por: Lee, Ah-Young, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of En masse Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
por: Khlef, Hanin Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Archform Comparisons between Skeletal Class II and III Malocclusions
por: Zou, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Skeletal, Dental and Soft Tissue Cephalometric Changes after Orthodontic Treatment of Dental Class II Malocclusion with Maxillary First Molar or First Premolar Extractions
por: Booij, Johan Willem, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of Pharyngeal Space in Different Combinations of Class II Skeletal Malocclusion
por: Soni, Jay, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Orthognathic Surgical Approach for Management of Skeletal Class II Vertical Malocclusion
por: Sundararajan, Sanjay, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Camouflage treatment guided by facial improvement in hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion
por: Wang, Huijuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Different approaches to the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion during growth: Bionator versus extraoral appliance
por: Rédua, Renato Barcellos
Publicado: (2020)

Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients
por: Esenlik, Elçin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Prevalence of maxillary canine impaction in skeletal Class III malocclusions compared to Class I malocclusions
por: Di Carlo, Gabriele, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Assessment of upper airways measurements in patients with mandibular skeletal Class II malocclusion
por: Silva, Nayanna Nadja e, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Correlation between vertical components and skeletal Class II malocclusion in ethnic Javanese
por: Ardani, I Gusti Aju Wahju, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Markers of Oxidative Stress in Adolescents with Skeletal Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
por: OBRADOVIC, Vesna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Accelerating Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion using Fixed Twin Block Appliances
por: Pattanaik, Snigdha, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Differences in the heritability of craniofacial skeletal and dental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and II malocclusions
por: Park, Heon-Mook, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ortho-surgical management of skeletal Class III malocclusion
por: Gupta, Rahul Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Surgical–orthodontic treatment of a skeletal class III malocclusion
por: Katiyar, Radha, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Correction of late adolescent skeletal Class III using the Alt-RAMEC protocol and skeletal anchorage
por: Büyükçavuş, Muhammed Hilmi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
por: Alotaibi, Saud
Publicado: (2023)

Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes With Mandibular Expansion in Growing Children
por: Gandhi, Vaibhav, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Skeletal growth in class II malocclusion from childhood to adolescence: does the profile straighten?
por: Taloumtzi, Matoula, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_homr8vqhipqkb2vk3g0398up31