Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance

BACKGROUND: There are controversial opinions about the effect of erupted second molars on distalization of the first molars. Most of the distalizing devices are anchored on the first molars, without including second molars; so, differences between sequentially distalize maxillary molars (second mola...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caprioglio, Alberto, Cozzani, Mauro, Fontana, Mattia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25139288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0049-6
_version_ 1782331248670146560
author Caprioglio, Alberto
Cozzani, Mauro
Fontana, Mattia
author_facet Caprioglio, Alberto
Cozzani, Mauro
Fontana, Mattia
author_sort Caprioglio, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are controversial opinions about the effect of erupted second molars on distalization of the first molars. Most of the distalizing devices are anchored on the first molars, without including second molars; so, differences between sequentially distalize maxillary molars (second molar followed by the first molar) or distalize second and first molars together are not clear. The aim of the study was to compare sequential versus simultaneous molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar using two different modified Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The treatment sample consisted of 35 class II malocclusion subjects, divided in two groups: group 1 consisted of 24 patients (13 males and 11 females) with a mean pre-treatment age of 12.9 years, treated with the Segmented Pendulum (SP) and fixed appliances; group 2 consisted of 11 patients (6 males and 5 females) with a mean pre-treatment age of 13.2 years, treated with the Quad Pendulum (QP) and fixed appliances. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before treatment (T1), at the end of distalization (T2), and at the end of orthodontic fixed appliance therapy (T3). A Student t test was used to identify significant between-group differences between T1 to T2, T2 to T3, and T1 to T3. RESULTS: QP and SP were equally effective in distalizing maxillary molars (3.5 and 4 mm, respectively) between T1 and T2; however, the maxillary first molar showed less distal tipping (4.6° vs. 9.6°) and more extrusion (1.1 vs. 0.2 mm) in the QP group than in the SP group, as well as the vertical facial dimension, which increased more in the QP group (1.2°) than in the SP group (0.7°). At T3, the QP group maintained greater increase in lower anterior facial height and molar extrusion and decrease in overbite than the SP group. CONCLUSION: Quad Pendulum seems to have greater increase in vertical dimension and molar extrusion than the Segmented Pendulum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4138551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41385512014-08-21 Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance Caprioglio, Alberto Cozzani, Mauro Fontana, Mattia Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: There are controversial opinions about the effect of erupted second molars on distalization of the first molars. Most of the distalizing devices are anchored on the first molars, without including second molars; so, differences between sequentially distalize maxillary molars (second molar followed by the first molar) or distalize second and first molars together are not clear. The aim of the study was to compare sequential versus simultaneous molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar using two different modified Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The treatment sample consisted of 35 class II malocclusion subjects, divided in two groups: group 1 consisted of 24 patients (13 males and 11 females) with a mean pre-treatment age of 12.9 years, treated with the Segmented Pendulum (SP) and fixed appliances; group 2 consisted of 11 patients (6 males and 5 females) with a mean pre-treatment age of 13.2 years, treated with the Quad Pendulum (QP) and fixed appliances. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before treatment (T1), at the end of distalization (T2), and at the end of orthodontic fixed appliance therapy (T3). A Student t test was used to identify significant between-group differences between T1 to T2, T2 to T3, and T1 to T3. RESULTS: QP and SP were equally effective in distalizing maxillary molars (3.5 and 4 mm, respectively) between T1 and T2; however, the maxillary first molar showed less distal tipping (4.6° vs. 9.6°) and more extrusion (1.1 vs. 0.2 mm) in the QP group than in the SP group, as well as the vertical facial dimension, which increased more in the QP group (1.2°) than in the SP group (0.7°). At T3, the QP group maintained greater increase in lower anterior facial height and molar extrusion and decrease in overbite than the SP group. CONCLUSION: Quad Pendulum seems to have greater increase in vertical dimension and molar extrusion than the Segmented Pendulum. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4138551/ /pubmed/25139288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0049-6 Text en © Fontana et al.; licensee springer. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Caprioglio, Alberto
Cozzani, Mauro
Fontana, Mattia
Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance
title Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance
title_full Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance
title_short Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance
title_sort comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: segmented versus quad pendulum appliance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25139288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0049-6
work_keys_str_mv AT caprioglioalberto comparativeevaluationofmolardistalizationtherapywitheruptedsecondmolarsegmentedversusquadpendulumappliance
AT cozzanimauro comparativeevaluationofmolardistalizationtherapywitheruptedsecondmolarsegmentedversusquadpendulumappliance
AT fontanamattia comparativeevaluationofmolardistalizationtherapywitheruptedsecondmolarsegmentedversusquadpendulumappliance