Cargando…

Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to describe the metabolic syndrome (MS) and to evaluate five diagnostic criteria of the MS with respect to their sensitivity and specificity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a cross-sectional case control study of T2D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onesi, S Ogedengbe, Ignatius, U Ezeani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143905
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.137494
_version_ 1782331293612113920
author Onesi, S Ogedengbe
Ignatius, U Ezeani
author_facet Onesi, S Ogedengbe
Ignatius, U Ezeani
author_sort Onesi, S Ogedengbe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to describe the metabolic syndrome (MS) and to evaluate five diagnostic criteria of the MS with respect to their sensitivity and specificity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a cross-sectional case control study of T2DM patients and their first degree relatives (FDRs) recruited using convenience sampling and data collected through questionnaire administered technique. Variables of interest included anthropometric indices, blood pressure, serum lipid profile, fasting blood sugar (FBS), proteinuria, and microalbuminuria. The Chi-square test was used for comparison of proportions. A P value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Kappa statistic was used to test the degree of agreement between the diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The World Health Organization (WHO), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), revised National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP-R), NCEP Adult Treatment Panel (ATP)-III, and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) criteria reported a prevalence of 87.1, 64.5, 61.3, 55.6, and 22.6%, respectively in persons with T2DM. Using the WHO criteria as a reference or gold standard, the sensitivity of the IDF, NCEP-R, NCEP ATP-III, and AACE criteria among persons with T2DM were 71.3, 67.6, 61.1, and 25.9% respectively. Using the WHO criteria as a reference or gold standard, the specificity of the IDF, NCEP-R, NCEP ATP-III, and AACE criteria among persons with T2DM were 81.3, 81.3, 81.3, and 100%, respectively. Using the WHO criteria as a reference or gold standard, the level of agreement of the IDF, NCEP-R, NCEP ATP-III, and AACE criteria with the WHO criteria among persons with T2DM (as estimated by the kappa statistics) were 0.30, 0.26, 0.21, and 0.08 respectively. CONCLUSION: The level of agreement appears to be generally poor, though the IDF criteria showed a fair level of agreement with the WHO criteria: Therefore the IDF criteria is recommended for screening of the MS in persons with T2DM because of its ease of application and its level of agreement with the WHO criteria being the best compared to the other three criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4138904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41389042014-08-20 Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias Onesi, S Ogedengbe Ignatius, U Ezeani Indian J Endocrinol Metab Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to describe the metabolic syndrome (MS) and to evaluate five diagnostic criteria of the MS with respect to their sensitivity and specificity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a cross-sectional case control study of T2DM patients and their first degree relatives (FDRs) recruited using convenience sampling and data collected through questionnaire administered technique. Variables of interest included anthropometric indices, blood pressure, serum lipid profile, fasting blood sugar (FBS), proteinuria, and microalbuminuria. The Chi-square test was used for comparison of proportions. A P value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Kappa statistic was used to test the degree of agreement between the diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The World Health Organization (WHO), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), revised National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP-R), NCEP Adult Treatment Panel (ATP)-III, and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) criteria reported a prevalence of 87.1, 64.5, 61.3, 55.6, and 22.6%, respectively in persons with T2DM. Using the WHO criteria as a reference or gold standard, the sensitivity of the IDF, NCEP-R, NCEP ATP-III, and AACE criteria among persons with T2DM were 71.3, 67.6, 61.1, and 25.9% respectively. Using the WHO criteria as a reference or gold standard, the specificity of the IDF, NCEP-R, NCEP ATP-III, and AACE criteria among persons with T2DM were 81.3, 81.3, 81.3, and 100%, respectively. Using the WHO criteria as a reference or gold standard, the level of agreement of the IDF, NCEP-R, NCEP ATP-III, and AACE criteria with the WHO criteria among persons with T2DM (as estimated by the kappa statistics) were 0.30, 0.26, 0.21, and 0.08 respectively. CONCLUSION: The level of agreement appears to be generally poor, though the IDF criteria showed a fair level of agreement with the WHO criteria: Therefore the IDF criteria is recommended for screening of the MS in persons with T2DM because of its ease of application and its level of agreement with the WHO criteria being the best compared to the other three criteria. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4138904/ /pubmed/25143905 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.137494 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Onesi, S Ogedengbe
Ignatius, U Ezeani
Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias
title Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias
title_full Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias
title_fullStr Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias
title_full_unstemmed Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias
title_short Metabolic syndrome: Performance of five different diagnostic criterias
title_sort metabolic syndrome: performance of five different diagnostic criterias
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143905
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.137494
work_keys_str_mv AT onesisogedengbe metabolicsyndromeperformanceoffivedifferentdiagnosticcriterias
AT ignatiusuezeani metabolicsyndromeperformanceoffivedifferentdiagnosticcriterias