Cargando…
An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions
BACKGROUND: In an effort to control non-medical use and/or medical abuse of prescription drugs, particularly prescription opioids, electronic prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP) have been introduced in North-American countries, Australia and some parts of Europe. Paradoxically, there are si...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-46 |
_version_ | 1782331302569050112 |
---|---|
author | Islam, M Mofizul McRae, Ian S |
author_facet | Islam, M Mofizul McRae, Ian S |
author_sort | Islam, M Mofizul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In an effort to control non-medical use and/or medical abuse of prescription drugs, particularly prescription opioids, electronic prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP) have been introduced in North-American countries, Australia and some parts of Europe. Paradoxically, there are simultaneous pressures to increase opioid prescribing for the benefit of individual patients and to reduce it for the sake of public health, and this pressure warrants a delicate balance of appropriate therapeutic uses of these drugs with the risk of developing dependence. This article discusses pros and cons of PDMP in reducing diversion of prescription opioids, without hampering access to those medications for those with genuine needs, and highlights tensions around PDMP implementation. DISCUSSION: PDMPs may help alleviate diversion, over-prescription and fraudulent prescribing/dispensing; prompt drug treatment referrals; avoid awkward drug urine test; and inform spatial changes in prescribing practices and help designing tailored interventions. Fear of legal retribution, privacy and data security, potential confusion about addiction and pseudo-addiction, and potential undue pressure of detecting misuse/diversion - are the major problems. There are tensions about unintended consequence of excessive regulatory enforcements, corresponding collateral damages particularly about inadequate prescribing for patients with genuine needs, and mandatory consultation requirements of PDMP. SUMMARY: In this era of information technology PDMP is likely to flourish and remain with us for a long time. A clear standard of practice against which physicians’ care will be judged may expedite the utilisation of PDMP. In addition, adequate training on addiction and pain management along with public awareness, point-of-supply data entry from pharmacy, point-of-care real-time access to data, increasing access to addiction treatment and appropriate regulatory enforcement preferably through healthcare administration, together, may help remove barriers to PDMP use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4138942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41389422014-08-21 An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions Islam, M Mofizul McRae, Ian S BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Commentary BACKGROUND: In an effort to control non-medical use and/or medical abuse of prescription drugs, particularly prescription opioids, electronic prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP) have been introduced in North-American countries, Australia and some parts of Europe. Paradoxically, there are simultaneous pressures to increase opioid prescribing for the benefit of individual patients and to reduce it for the sake of public health, and this pressure warrants a delicate balance of appropriate therapeutic uses of these drugs with the risk of developing dependence. This article discusses pros and cons of PDMP in reducing diversion of prescription opioids, without hampering access to those medications for those with genuine needs, and highlights tensions around PDMP implementation. DISCUSSION: PDMPs may help alleviate diversion, over-prescription and fraudulent prescribing/dispensing; prompt drug treatment referrals; avoid awkward drug urine test; and inform spatial changes in prescribing practices and help designing tailored interventions. Fear of legal retribution, privacy and data security, potential confusion about addiction and pseudo-addiction, and potential undue pressure of detecting misuse/diversion - are the major problems. There are tensions about unintended consequence of excessive regulatory enforcements, corresponding collateral damages particularly about inadequate prescribing for patients with genuine needs, and mandatory consultation requirements of PDMP. SUMMARY: In this era of information technology PDMP is likely to flourish and remain with us for a long time. A clear standard of practice against which physicians’ care will be judged may expedite the utilisation of PDMP. In addition, adequate training on addiction and pain management along with public awareness, point-of-supply data entry from pharmacy, point-of-care real-time access to data, increasing access to addiction treatment and appropriate regulatory enforcement preferably through healthcare administration, together, may help remove barriers to PDMP use. BioMed Central 2014-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4138942/ /pubmed/25127880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-46 Text en Copyright © 2014 Islam and McRae; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Islam, M Mofizul McRae, Ian S An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions |
title | An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions |
title_full | An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions |
title_fullStr | An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions |
title_full_unstemmed | An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions |
title_short | An inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions |
title_sort | inevitable wave of prescription drug monitoring programs in the context of prescription opioids: pros, cons and tensions |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-46 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islammmofizul aninevitablewaveofprescriptiondrugmonitoringprogramsinthecontextofprescriptionopioidsprosconsandtensions AT mcraeians aninevitablewaveofprescriptiondrugmonitoringprogramsinthecontextofprescriptionopioidsprosconsandtensions AT islammmofizul inevitablewaveofprescriptiondrugmonitoringprogramsinthecontextofprescriptionopioidsprosconsandtensions AT mcraeians inevitablewaveofprescriptiondrugmonitoringprogramsinthecontextofprescriptionopioidsprosconsandtensions |