Cargando…

Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption

BACKGROUND: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon (ST) grafts has become more popular and has achieved relatively good results; however optimal reconstruction technique, single-tunnel or two-tunnel, still remains controversial. This paper is to compare the clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Zhiyong, Graham, Jove, Zhang, Yingze, Strohecker, Kent, Feldmann, Daniel, Bowen, Thomas R, Chen, Wei, Smith, Wade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-53
_version_ 1782331323156791296
author Hou, Zhiyong
Graham, Jove
Zhang, Yingze
Strohecker, Kent
Feldmann, Daniel
Bowen, Thomas R
Chen, Wei
Smith, Wade
author_facet Hou, Zhiyong
Graham, Jove
Zhang, Yingze
Strohecker, Kent
Feldmann, Daniel
Bowen, Thomas R
Chen, Wei
Smith, Wade
author_sort Hou, Zhiyong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon (ST) grafts has become more popular and has achieved relatively good results; however optimal reconstruction technique, single-tunnel or two-tunnel, still remains controversial. This paper is to compare the clinical and radiographic data of allogenous ST grafting with single- or two-tunnel reconstruction techniques of the AC joint. METHODS: The outcomes of 21 consecutive patients who underwent anatomical reduction and ST grafting for AC joint separation were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: single-tunnel group (11) and two-tunnel group (10). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically using a modified UCLA rating scale. RESULTS: The majority of separations (18 of 21) were Rockwood type V, with one each in type III, IV and VI categories. The overall mean follow-up time was 16 months, and at the time of the latest follow-up, the overall mean UCLA rating score was 14.1 (range 8–20). The percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes was significantly higher for patients with the two-tunnel technique than for those with the one-tunnel technique (70% vs. 18%, respectively, p = 0.03). Within the single-tunnel group, there was no statistically significant difference in percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between patients with vs. without tightrope augmentation (17% vs 20%, p > 0.99). Similarly, within the two-tunnel group, there was no significant difference in the percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between the graft only and augment groups (67% vs. 75%, p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Anatomical reduction of the AC joint and reconstruction CC ligaments are crucial for optimal joint stability and function. Two-tunnel CC reconstruction with an allogenous ST graft provides superior significantly better radiographic and clinical results compared to the single-tunnel reconstruction technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4139139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41391392014-08-21 Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption Hou, Zhiyong Graham, Jove Zhang, Yingze Strohecker, Kent Feldmann, Daniel Bowen, Thomas R Chen, Wei Smith, Wade BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon (ST) grafts has become more popular and has achieved relatively good results; however optimal reconstruction technique, single-tunnel or two-tunnel, still remains controversial. This paper is to compare the clinical and radiographic data of allogenous ST grafting with single- or two-tunnel reconstruction techniques of the AC joint. METHODS: The outcomes of 21 consecutive patients who underwent anatomical reduction and ST grafting for AC joint separation were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: single-tunnel group (11) and two-tunnel group (10). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically using a modified UCLA rating scale. RESULTS: The majority of separations (18 of 21) were Rockwood type V, with one each in type III, IV and VI categories. The overall mean follow-up time was 16 months, and at the time of the latest follow-up, the overall mean UCLA rating score was 14.1 (range 8–20). The percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes was significantly higher for patients with the two-tunnel technique than for those with the one-tunnel technique (70% vs. 18%, respectively, p = 0.03). Within the single-tunnel group, there was no statistically significant difference in percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between patients with vs. without tightrope augmentation (17% vs 20%, p > 0.99). Similarly, within the two-tunnel group, there was no significant difference in the percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between the graft only and augment groups (67% vs. 75%, p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Anatomical reduction of the AC joint and reconstruction CC ligaments are crucial for optimal joint stability and function. Two-tunnel CC reconstruction with an allogenous ST graft provides superior significantly better radiographic and clinical results compared to the single-tunnel reconstruction technique. BioMed Central 2014-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4139139/ /pubmed/25127715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-53 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hou, Zhiyong
Graham, Jove
Zhang, Yingze
Strohecker, Kent
Feldmann, Daniel
Bowen, Thomas R
Chen, Wei
Smith, Wade
Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
title Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
title_full Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
title_fullStr Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
title_short Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
title_sort comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-53
work_keys_str_mv AT houzhiyong comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption
AT grahamjove comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption
AT zhangyingze comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption
AT stroheckerkent comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption
AT feldmanndaniel comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption
AT bowenthomasr comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption
AT chenwei comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption
AT smithwade comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption