Cargando…
Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption
BACKGROUND: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon (ST) grafts has become more popular and has achieved relatively good results; however optimal reconstruction technique, single-tunnel or two-tunnel, still remains controversial. This paper is to compare the clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-53 |
_version_ | 1782331323156791296 |
---|---|
author | Hou, Zhiyong Graham, Jove Zhang, Yingze Strohecker, Kent Feldmann, Daniel Bowen, Thomas R Chen, Wei Smith, Wade |
author_facet | Hou, Zhiyong Graham, Jove Zhang, Yingze Strohecker, Kent Feldmann, Daniel Bowen, Thomas R Chen, Wei Smith, Wade |
author_sort | Hou, Zhiyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon (ST) grafts has become more popular and has achieved relatively good results; however optimal reconstruction technique, single-tunnel or two-tunnel, still remains controversial. This paper is to compare the clinical and radiographic data of allogenous ST grafting with single- or two-tunnel reconstruction techniques of the AC joint. METHODS: The outcomes of 21 consecutive patients who underwent anatomical reduction and ST grafting for AC joint separation were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: single-tunnel group (11) and two-tunnel group (10). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically using a modified UCLA rating scale. RESULTS: The majority of separations (18 of 21) were Rockwood type V, with one each in type III, IV and VI categories. The overall mean follow-up time was 16 months, and at the time of the latest follow-up, the overall mean UCLA rating score was 14.1 (range 8–20). The percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes was significantly higher for patients with the two-tunnel technique than for those with the one-tunnel technique (70% vs. 18%, respectively, p = 0.03). Within the single-tunnel group, there was no statistically significant difference in percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between patients with vs. without tightrope augmentation (17% vs 20%, p > 0.99). Similarly, within the two-tunnel group, there was no significant difference in the percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between the graft only and augment groups (67% vs. 75%, p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Anatomical reduction of the AC joint and reconstruction CC ligaments are crucial for optimal joint stability and function. Two-tunnel CC reconstruction with an allogenous ST graft provides superior significantly better radiographic and clinical results compared to the single-tunnel reconstruction technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4139139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41391392014-08-21 Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption Hou, Zhiyong Graham, Jove Zhang, Yingze Strohecker, Kent Feldmann, Daniel Bowen, Thomas R Chen, Wei Smith, Wade BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon (ST) grafts has become more popular and has achieved relatively good results; however optimal reconstruction technique, single-tunnel or two-tunnel, still remains controversial. This paper is to compare the clinical and radiographic data of allogenous ST grafting with single- or two-tunnel reconstruction techniques of the AC joint. METHODS: The outcomes of 21 consecutive patients who underwent anatomical reduction and ST grafting for AC joint separation were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: single-tunnel group (11) and two-tunnel group (10). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically using a modified UCLA rating scale. RESULTS: The majority of separations (18 of 21) were Rockwood type V, with one each in type III, IV and VI categories. The overall mean follow-up time was 16 months, and at the time of the latest follow-up, the overall mean UCLA rating score was 14.1 (range 8–20). The percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes was significantly higher for patients with the two-tunnel technique than for those with the one-tunnel technique (70% vs. 18%, respectively, p = 0.03). Within the single-tunnel group, there was no statistically significant difference in percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between patients with vs. without tightrope augmentation (17% vs 20%, p > 0.99). Similarly, within the two-tunnel group, there was no significant difference in the percentage of good-to-excellent outcomes between the graft only and augment groups (67% vs. 75%, p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Anatomical reduction of the AC joint and reconstruction CC ligaments are crucial for optimal joint stability and function. Two-tunnel CC reconstruction with an allogenous ST graft provides superior significantly better radiographic and clinical results compared to the single-tunnel reconstruction technique. BioMed Central 2014-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4139139/ /pubmed/25127715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-53 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hou, Zhiyong Graham, Jove Zhang, Yingze Strohecker, Kent Feldmann, Daniel Bowen, Thomas R Chen, Wei Smith, Wade Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption |
title | Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption |
title_full | Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption |
title_fullStr | Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption |
title_short | Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption |
title_sort | comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-53 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houzhiyong comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption AT grahamjove comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption AT zhangyingze comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption AT stroheckerkent comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption AT feldmanndaniel comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption AT bowenthomasr comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption AT chenwei comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption AT smithwade comparisonofsingleandtwotunneltechniquesduringopentreatmentofacromioclavicularjointdisruption |