Cargando…

Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views

BACKGROUND: Developments in enzyme replacement therapy have kindled discussions on adding Pompe disease, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and wasting, to neonatal screening. Pompe disease does not fit traditional screening criteria as it is a broad-spectrum phenotype disorder that may oc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van El, Carla G, Rigter, Tessel, Reuser, Arnold JJ, van der Ploeg, Ans T, Weinreich, Stephanie S, Cornel, Martina C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25124044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-203
_version_ 1782331323857240064
author van El, Carla G
Rigter, Tessel
Reuser, Arnold JJ
van der Ploeg, Ans T
Weinreich, Stephanie S
Cornel, Martina C
author_facet van El, Carla G
Rigter, Tessel
Reuser, Arnold JJ
van der Ploeg, Ans T
Weinreich, Stephanie S
Cornel, Martina C
author_sort van El, Carla G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Developments in enzyme replacement therapy have kindled discussions on adding Pompe disease, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and wasting, to neonatal screening. Pompe disease does not fit traditional screening criteria as it is a broad-spectrum phenotype disorder that may occur in lethal form in early infancy or manifest in less severe forms from infancy to late adulthood. Current screening tests cannot differentiate between these forms. Normally, expanding screening is discussed among experts in advisory bodies. While advisory reports usually mention the procedures and outcome of deliberations, little is known of the importance attached to different arguments and the actual weighing processes involved. In this research we aim to explore the views of a wide range of relevant professionals to gain more insight into the process of weighing pros and cons of neonatal screening for Pompe disease, as an example of the dilemmas involved in screening for broad-spectrum phenotype disorders. METHODS: We conducted 24 semi-structured interviews with medical, lab, insurance and screening professionals, and executive staff of patient organisations. They were asked about their first reaction to neonatal screening for Pompe disease, after which benefits and harms and requirements for screening were explored in more detail. RESULTS: Advantages included health gain by timely intervention, avoiding a diagnostic quest, having a reproductive choice and gaining more knowledge about the natural course and treatment. Being prepared was mentioned as an advantage for the later manifesting cases. Disadvantages included treatment costs and uncertainties about its effect, the timing of treatment in later manifesting cases, the psychological burden for the patient-in-waiting and the family. Also the downsides of having prior knowledge as well as having to consider a reproductive option were mentioned as disadvantages. CONCLUSION: When weighing pros and cons, interviewees attach different importance to different arguments, based on personal and professional views. Professionals expect benefits from neonatal screening for Pompe disease, especially for early-onset cases. Some interviewees valued screening in later manifesting cases as well, while stressing the need for adequate support of pre-symptomatic patients and their families. Others considered the psychological burden and uncertainties regarding treatment as reasons not to screen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4139142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41391422014-08-21 Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views van El, Carla G Rigter, Tessel Reuser, Arnold JJ van der Ploeg, Ans T Weinreich, Stephanie S Cornel, Martina C BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Developments in enzyme replacement therapy have kindled discussions on adding Pompe disease, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and wasting, to neonatal screening. Pompe disease does not fit traditional screening criteria as it is a broad-spectrum phenotype disorder that may occur in lethal form in early infancy or manifest in less severe forms from infancy to late adulthood. Current screening tests cannot differentiate between these forms. Normally, expanding screening is discussed among experts in advisory bodies. While advisory reports usually mention the procedures and outcome of deliberations, little is known of the importance attached to different arguments and the actual weighing processes involved. In this research we aim to explore the views of a wide range of relevant professionals to gain more insight into the process of weighing pros and cons of neonatal screening for Pompe disease, as an example of the dilemmas involved in screening for broad-spectrum phenotype disorders. METHODS: We conducted 24 semi-structured interviews with medical, lab, insurance and screening professionals, and executive staff of patient organisations. They were asked about their first reaction to neonatal screening for Pompe disease, after which benefits and harms and requirements for screening were explored in more detail. RESULTS: Advantages included health gain by timely intervention, avoiding a diagnostic quest, having a reproductive choice and gaining more knowledge about the natural course and treatment. Being prepared was mentioned as an advantage for the later manifesting cases. Disadvantages included treatment costs and uncertainties about its effect, the timing of treatment in later manifesting cases, the psychological burden for the patient-in-waiting and the family. Also the downsides of having prior knowledge as well as having to consider a reproductive option were mentioned as disadvantages. CONCLUSION: When weighing pros and cons, interviewees attach different importance to different arguments, based on personal and professional views. Professionals expect benefits from neonatal screening for Pompe disease, especially for early-onset cases. Some interviewees valued screening in later manifesting cases as well, while stressing the need for adequate support of pre-symptomatic patients and their families. Others considered the psychological burden and uncertainties regarding treatment as reasons not to screen. BioMed Central 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4139142/ /pubmed/25124044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-203 Text en Copyright © 2014 van El et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van El, Carla G
Rigter, Tessel
Reuser, Arnold JJ
van der Ploeg, Ans T
Weinreich, Stephanie S
Cornel, Martina C
Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
title Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
title_full Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
title_fullStr Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
title_full_unstemmed Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
title_short Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
title_sort newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25124044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-203
work_keys_str_mv AT vanelcarlag newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews
AT rigtertessel newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews
AT reuserarnoldjj newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews
AT vanderploeganst newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews
AT weinreichstephanies newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews
AT cornelmartinac newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews