Cargando…
Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views
BACKGROUND: Developments in enzyme replacement therapy have kindled discussions on adding Pompe disease, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and wasting, to neonatal screening. Pompe disease does not fit traditional screening criteria as it is a broad-spectrum phenotype disorder that may oc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25124044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-203 |
_version_ | 1782331323857240064 |
---|---|
author | van El, Carla G Rigter, Tessel Reuser, Arnold JJ van der Ploeg, Ans T Weinreich, Stephanie S Cornel, Martina C |
author_facet | van El, Carla G Rigter, Tessel Reuser, Arnold JJ van der Ploeg, Ans T Weinreich, Stephanie S Cornel, Martina C |
author_sort | van El, Carla G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Developments in enzyme replacement therapy have kindled discussions on adding Pompe disease, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and wasting, to neonatal screening. Pompe disease does not fit traditional screening criteria as it is a broad-spectrum phenotype disorder that may occur in lethal form in early infancy or manifest in less severe forms from infancy to late adulthood. Current screening tests cannot differentiate between these forms. Normally, expanding screening is discussed among experts in advisory bodies. While advisory reports usually mention the procedures and outcome of deliberations, little is known of the importance attached to different arguments and the actual weighing processes involved. In this research we aim to explore the views of a wide range of relevant professionals to gain more insight into the process of weighing pros and cons of neonatal screening for Pompe disease, as an example of the dilemmas involved in screening for broad-spectrum phenotype disorders. METHODS: We conducted 24 semi-structured interviews with medical, lab, insurance and screening professionals, and executive staff of patient organisations. They were asked about their first reaction to neonatal screening for Pompe disease, after which benefits and harms and requirements for screening were explored in more detail. RESULTS: Advantages included health gain by timely intervention, avoiding a diagnostic quest, having a reproductive choice and gaining more knowledge about the natural course and treatment. Being prepared was mentioned as an advantage for the later manifesting cases. Disadvantages included treatment costs and uncertainties about its effect, the timing of treatment in later manifesting cases, the psychological burden for the patient-in-waiting and the family. Also the downsides of having prior knowledge as well as having to consider a reproductive option were mentioned as disadvantages. CONCLUSION: When weighing pros and cons, interviewees attach different importance to different arguments, based on personal and professional views. Professionals expect benefits from neonatal screening for Pompe disease, especially for early-onset cases. Some interviewees valued screening in later manifesting cases as well, while stressing the need for adequate support of pre-symptomatic patients and their families. Others considered the psychological burden and uncertainties regarding treatment as reasons not to screen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4139142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41391422014-08-21 Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views van El, Carla G Rigter, Tessel Reuser, Arnold JJ van der Ploeg, Ans T Weinreich, Stephanie S Cornel, Martina C BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Developments in enzyme replacement therapy have kindled discussions on adding Pompe disease, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and wasting, to neonatal screening. Pompe disease does not fit traditional screening criteria as it is a broad-spectrum phenotype disorder that may occur in lethal form in early infancy or manifest in less severe forms from infancy to late adulthood. Current screening tests cannot differentiate between these forms. Normally, expanding screening is discussed among experts in advisory bodies. While advisory reports usually mention the procedures and outcome of deliberations, little is known of the importance attached to different arguments and the actual weighing processes involved. In this research we aim to explore the views of a wide range of relevant professionals to gain more insight into the process of weighing pros and cons of neonatal screening for Pompe disease, as an example of the dilemmas involved in screening for broad-spectrum phenotype disorders. METHODS: We conducted 24 semi-structured interviews with medical, lab, insurance and screening professionals, and executive staff of patient organisations. They were asked about their first reaction to neonatal screening for Pompe disease, after which benefits and harms and requirements for screening were explored in more detail. RESULTS: Advantages included health gain by timely intervention, avoiding a diagnostic quest, having a reproductive choice and gaining more knowledge about the natural course and treatment. Being prepared was mentioned as an advantage for the later manifesting cases. Disadvantages included treatment costs and uncertainties about its effect, the timing of treatment in later manifesting cases, the psychological burden for the patient-in-waiting and the family. Also the downsides of having prior knowledge as well as having to consider a reproductive option were mentioned as disadvantages. CONCLUSION: When weighing pros and cons, interviewees attach different importance to different arguments, based on personal and professional views. Professionals expect benefits from neonatal screening for Pompe disease, especially for early-onset cases. Some interviewees valued screening in later manifesting cases as well, while stressing the need for adequate support of pre-symptomatic patients and their families. Others considered the psychological burden and uncertainties regarding treatment as reasons not to screen. BioMed Central 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4139142/ /pubmed/25124044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-203 Text en Copyright © 2014 van El et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van El, Carla G Rigter, Tessel Reuser, Arnold JJ van der Ploeg, Ans T Weinreich, Stephanie S Cornel, Martina C Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views |
title | Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views |
title_full | Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views |
title_fullStr | Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views |
title_full_unstemmed | Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views |
title_short | Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views |
title_sort | newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25124044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanelcarlag newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews AT rigtertessel newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews AT reuserarnoldjj newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews AT vanderploeganst newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews AT weinreichstephanies newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews AT cornelmartinac newbornscreeningforpompediseaseaqualitativestudyexploringprofessionalviews |