Cargando…

Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE: To compare persistence with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) antagonists among rheumatoid arthritis patients in British Columbia. Treatment persistence has been suggested as a proxy for real-world therapeutic benefit and harm of treatments for chronic non-curable diseases, including rheu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Anat, Bassett, Ken, Wright, James M., Brookhart, M. Alan, Freeman, Hugh, Dormuth, Colin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25141123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105193
_version_ 1782331346260066304
author Fisher, Anat
Bassett, Ken
Wright, James M.
Brookhart, M. Alan
Freeman, Hugh
Dormuth, Colin R.
author_facet Fisher, Anat
Bassett, Ken
Wright, James M.
Brookhart, M. Alan
Freeman, Hugh
Dormuth, Colin R.
author_sort Fisher, Anat
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare persistence with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) antagonists among rheumatoid arthritis patients in British Columbia. Treatment persistence has been suggested as a proxy for real-world therapeutic benefit and harm of treatments for chronic non-curable diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. We hypothesized that the different pharmacological characteristics of infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept cause statistically and clinically significant differences in persistence. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative health data from the Canadian province of British Columbia. The study cohort included rheumatoid arthritis patients who initiated the first course of a TNF antagonist between 2001 and 2008. Persistence was measured as the time between first dispensing to discontinuation. Drug discontinuation was defined as a drug-free interval of 180 days or switching to another TNF antagonist, anakinra, rituximab or abatacept. Persistence was estimated and compared using survival analysis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 2,923 patients, 63% treated with etanercept. Median persistence in years (95% confidence interval) with infliximab was 3.7 (2.9–4.9), with adalimumab 3.3 (2.6–4.1) and with etanercept 3.8 (3.3–4.3). Similar risk of discontinuation was observed for the three drugs: the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.98 (0.85–1.13) comparing infliximab with etanercept, 0.95 (0.78–1.15) comparing infliximab with adalimumab and 1.04 (0.88–1.22) comparing adalimumab with etanercept. CONCLUSIONS: Similar persistence was observed with infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis patients during the first 9 years of use. If treatment persistence is a good proxy for the therapeutic benefit and harm of these drugs, then this finding suggests that the three drugs share an overall similar benefit-harm profile in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4139324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41393242014-08-25 Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study Fisher, Anat Bassett, Ken Wright, James M. Brookhart, M. Alan Freeman, Hugh Dormuth, Colin R. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare persistence with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) antagonists among rheumatoid arthritis patients in British Columbia. Treatment persistence has been suggested as a proxy for real-world therapeutic benefit and harm of treatments for chronic non-curable diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. We hypothesized that the different pharmacological characteristics of infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept cause statistically and clinically significant differences in persistence. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative health data from the Canadian province of British Columbia. The study cohort included rheumatoid arthritis patients who initiated the first course of a TNF antagonist between 2001 and 2008. Persistence was measured as the time between first dispensing to discontinuation. Drug discontinuation was defined as a drug-free interval of 180 days or switching to another TNF antagonist, anakinra, rituximab or abatacept. Persistence was estimated and compared using survival analysis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 2,923 patients, 63% treated with etanercept. Median persistence in years (95% confidence interval) with infliximab was 3.7 (2.9–4.9), with adalimumab 3.3 (2.6–4.1) and with etanercept 3.8 (3.3–4.3). Similar risk of discontinuation was observed for the three drugs: the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.98 (0.85–1.13) comparing infliximab with etanercept, 0.95 (0.78–1.15) comparing infliximab with adalimumab and 1.04 (0.88–1.22) comparing adalimumab with etanercept. CONCLUSIONS: Similar persistence was observed with infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis patients during the first 9 years of use. If treatment persistence is a good proxy for the therapeutic benefit and harm of these drugs, then this finding suggests that the three drugs share an overall similar benefit-harm profile in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Public Library of Science 2014-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4139324/ /pubmed/25141123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105193 Text en © 2014 Fisher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fisher, Anat
Bassett, Ken
Wright, James M.
Brookhart, M. Alan
Freeman, Hugh
Dormuth, Colin R.
Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study
title Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study
title_full Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study
title_short Comparative Persistence of the TNF Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Population-Based Cohort Study
title_sort comparative persistence of the tnf antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis – a population-based cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25141123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105193
work_keys_str_mv AT fisheranat comparativepersistenceofthetnfantagonistsinrheumatoidarthritisapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT bassettken comparativepersistenceofthetnfantagonistsinrheumatoidarthritisapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT wrightjamesm comparativepersistenceofthetnfantagonistsinrheumatoidarthritisapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT brookhartmalan comparativepersistenceofthetnfantagonistsinrheumatoidarthritisapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT freemanhugh comparativepersistenceofthetnfantagonistsinrheumatoidarthritisapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT dormuthcolinr comparativepersistenceofthetnfantagonistsinrheumatoidarthritisapopulationbasedcohortstudy