Cargando…

Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies involve substantial acoustic noise. This review covers the difficulties posed by such noise for auditory neuroscience, as well as a number of possible solutions that have emerged. Acoustic noise can affect the processing of auditory stimuli by mak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Peelle, Jonathan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25191218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00253
_version_ 1782331376508338176
author Peelle, Jonathan E.
author_facet Peelle, Jonathan E.
author_sort Peelle, Jonathan E.
collection PubMed
description Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies involve substantial acoustic noise. This review covers the difficulties posed by such noise for auditory neuroscience, as well as a number of possible solutions that have emerged. Acoustic noise can affect the processing of auditory stimuli by making them inaudible or unintelligible, and can result in reduced sensitivity to auditory activation in auditory cortex. Equally importantly, acoustic noise may also lead to increased listening effort, meaning that even when auditory stimuli are perceived, neural processing may differ from when the same stimuli are presented in quiet. These and other challenges have motivated a number of approaches for collecting auditory fMRI data. Although using a continuous echoplanar imaging (EPI) sequence provides high quality imaging data, these data may also be contaminated by background acoustic noise. Traditional sparse imaging has the advantage of avoiding acoustic noise during stimulus presentation, but at a cost of reduced temporal resolution. Recently, three classes of techniques have been developed to circumvent these limitations. The first is Interleaved Silent Steady State (ISSS) imaging, a variation of sparse imaging that involves collecting multiple volumes following a silent period while maintaining steady-state longitudinal magnetization. The second involves active noise control to limit the impact of acoustic scanner noise. Finally, novel MRI sequences that reduce the amount of acoustic noise produced during fMRI make the use of continuous scanning a more practical option. Together these advances provide unprecedented opportunities for researchers to collect high-quality data of hemodynamic responses to auditory stimuli using fMRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4139601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41396012014-09-04 Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging Peelle, Jonathan E. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies involve substantial acoustic noise. This review covers the difficulties posed by such noise for auditory neuroscience, as well as a number of possible solutions that have emerged. Acoustic noise can affect the processing of auditory stimuli by making them inaudible or unintelligible, and can result in reduced sensitivity to auditory activation in auditory cortex. Equally importantly, acoustic noise may also lead to increased listening effort, meaning that even when auditory stimuli are perceived, neural processing may differ from when the same stimuli are presented in quiet. These and other challenges have motivated a number of approaches for collecting auditory fMRI data. Although using a continuous echoplanar imaging (EPI) sequence provides high quality imaging data, these data may also be contaminated by background acoustic noise. Traditional sparse imaging has the advantage of avoiding acoustic noise during stimulus presentation, but at a cost of reduced temporal resolution. Recently, three classes of techniques have been developed to circumvent these limitations. The first is Interleaved Silent Steady State (ISSS) imaging, a variation of sparse imaging that involves collecting multiple volumes following a silent period while maintaining steady-state longitudinal magnetization. The second involves active noise control to limit the impact of acoustic scanner noise. Finally, novel MRI sequences that reduce the amount of acoustic noise produced during fMRI make the use of continuous scanning a more practical option. Together these advances provide unprecedented opportunities for researchers to collect high-quality data of hemodynamic responses to auditory stimuli using fMRI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4139601/ /pubmed/25191218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00253 Text en Copyright © 2014 Peelle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Peelle, Jonathan E.
Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging
title Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25191218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00253
work_keys_str_mv AT peellejonathane methodologicalchallengesandsolutionsinauditoryfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging