Cargando…

Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVES: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsia, Renee Y, Akosa Antwi, Yaa, Nath, Julia P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005482
_version_ 1782331382379315200
author Hsia, Renee Y
Akosa Antwi, Yaa
Nath, Julia P
author_facet Hsia, Renee Y
Akosa Antwi, Yaa
Nath, Julia P
author_sort Hsia, Renee Y
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of charge variation between hospitals for 10 common blood tests using charge data reported by all non-federal California hospitals to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development in 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Charges for 10 common blood tests at California hospitals during 2011. RESULTS: We found that charges for blood tests varied significantly between California hospitals. For example, charges for a lipid panel ranged from US$10 to US$10 169, a thousand-fold difference. Although government hospitals and teaching hospitals were found to charge significantly less than their counterparts for many blood tests, few other hospital characteristics and no market-level predictors significantly predicted charges for blood tests. Our models explained, at most, 21% of the variation between hospitals in charges for the blood test in question. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the seemingly arbitrary nature of the charge setting process, making it difficult for patients to act as true consumers in this era of ‘consumer-directed healthcare.’
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4139626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41396262014-08-25 Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis Hsia, Renee Y Akosa Antwi, Yaa Nath, Julia P BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of charge variation between hospitals for 10 common blood tests using charge data reported by all non-federal California hospitals to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development in 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Charges for 10 common blood tests at California hospitals during 2011. RESULTS: We found that charges for blood tests varied significantly between California hospitals. For example, charges for a lipid panel ranged from US$10 to US$10 169, a thousand-fold difference. Although government hospitals and teaching hospitals were found to charge significantly less than their counterparts for many blood tests, few other hospital characteristics and no market-level predictors significantly predicted charges for blood tests. Our models explained, at most, 21% of the variation between hospitals in charges for the blood test in question. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the seemingly arbitrary nature of the charge setting process, making it difficult for patients to act as true consumers in this era of ‘consumer-directed healthcare.’ BMJ Publishing Group 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4139626/ /pubmed/25127708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005482 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hsia, Renee Y
Akosa Antwi, Yaa
Nath, Julia P
Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
title Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
title_full Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
title_fullStr Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
title_short Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
title_sort variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in california hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005482
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiareneey variationinchargesfor10commonbloodtestsincaliforniahospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis
AT akosaantwiyaa variationinchargesfor10commonbloodtestsincaliforniahospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis
AT nathjuliap variationinchargesfor10commonbloodtestsincaliforniahospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis