Cargando…
Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis
OBJECTIVES: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of ch...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005482 |
_version_ | 1782331382379315200 |
---|---|
author | Hsia, Renee Y Akosa Antwi, Yaa Nath, Julia P |
author_facet | Hsia, Renee Y Akosa Antwi, Yaa Nath, Julia P |
author_sort | Hsia, Renee Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of charge variation between hospitals for 10 common blood tests using charge data reported by all non-federal California hospitals to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development in 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Charges for 10 common blood tests at California hospitals during 2011. RESULTS: We found that charges for blood tests varied significantly between California hospitals. For example, charges for a lipid panel ranged from US$10 to US$10 169, a thousand-fold difference. Although government hospitals and teaching hospitals were found to charge significantly less than their counterparts for many blood tests, few other hospital characteristics and no market-level predictors significantly predicted charges for blood tests. Our models explained, at most, 21% of the variation between hospitals in charges for the blood test in question. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the seemingly arbitrary nature of the charge setting process, making it difficult for patients to act as true consumers in this era of ‘consumer-directed healthcare.’ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4139626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41396262014-08-25 Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis Hsia, Renee Y Akosa Antwi, Yaa Nath, Julia P BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of charge variation between hospitals for 10 common blood tests using charge data reported by all non-federal California hospitals to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development in 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Charges for 10 common blood tests at California hospitals during 2011. RESULTS: We found that charges for blood tests varied significantly between California hospitals. For example, charges for a lipid panel ranged from US$10 to US$10 169, a thousand-fold difference. Although government hospitals and teaching hospitals were found to charge significantly less than their counterparts for many blood tests, few other hospital characteristics and no market-level predictors significantly predicted charges for blood tests. Our models explained, at most, 21% of the variation between hospitals in charges for the blood test in question. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the seemingly arbitrary nature of the charge setting process, making it difficult for patients to act as true consumers in this era of ‘consumer-directed healthcare.’ BMJ Publishing Group 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4139626/ /pubmed/25127708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005482 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Hsia, Renee Y Akosa Antwi, Yaa Nath, Julia P Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title | Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_full | Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_fullStr | Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_short | Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_sort | variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in california hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsiareneey variationinchargesfor10commonbloodtestsincaliforniahospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis AT akosaantwiyaa variationinchargesfor10commonbloodtestsincaliforniahospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis AT nathjuliap variationinchargesfor10commonbloodtestsincaliforniahospitalsacrosssectionalanalysis |