Cargando…
Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy
Actigraphy as an objective measure of sleep and wakefulness in infants and children has gained popularity over the last 20 years. However, the field lacks published guidelines for sleep–wake identification within pediatric age groups. The scoring rules vary greatly and although sensitivity (sleep ag...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25191278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00099 |
_version_ | 1782331403451498496 |
---|---|
author | Galland, Barbara Meredith-Jones, Kim Terrill, Philip Taylor, Rachael |
author_facet | Galland, Barbara Meredith-Jones, Kim Terrill, Philip Taylor, Rachael |
author_sort | Galland, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Actigraphy as an objective measure of sleep and wakefulness in infants and children has gained popularity over the last 20 years. However, the field lacks published guidelines for sleep–wake identification within pediatric age groups. The scoring rules vary greatly and although sensitivity (sleep agreement with polysomnography) is usually high, a significant limitation remains in relation to specificity (wake agreement). Furthermore, accurate algorithm output and sleep–wake summaries usually require prior entry from daily logs of sleep–wake periods and artifact-related information (e.g., non-wear time), involving significant parent co-operation. Scoring criteria for daytime naps remains an unexplored area. Many of the problems facing accuracy of measurement are inherent within the field of actigraphy itself, particularly where sleep periods containing significant movements are erroneously classified as wake, and within quiet wakefulness when no movements are detected, erroneously classified as sleep. We discuss the challenges of actigraphy for pediatric sleep, briefly describe the technical basis and consider a number of technological approaches that may facilitate improved classification of errors in sleep–wake discrimination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4139737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41397372014-09-04 Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy Galland, Barbara Meredith-Jones, Kim Terrill, Philip Taylor, Rachael Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Actigraphy as an objective measure of sleep and wakefulness in infants and children has gained popularity over the last 20 years. However, the field lacks published guidelines for sleep–wake identification within pediatric age groups. The scoring rules vary greatly and although sensitivity (sleep agreement with polysomnography) is usually high, a significant limitation remains in relation to specificity (wake agreement). Furthermore, accurate algorithm output and sleep–wake summaries usually require prior entry from daily logs of sleep–wake periods and artifact-related information (e.g., non-wear time), involving significant parent co-operation. Scoring criteria for daytime naps remains an unexplored area. Many of the problems facing accuracy of measurement are inherent within the field of actigraphy itself, particularly where sleep periods containing significant movements are erroneously classified as wake, and within quiet wakefulness when no movements are detected, erroneously classified as sleep. We discuss the challenges of actigraphy for pediatric sleep, briefly describe the technical basis and consider a number of technological approaches that may facilitate improved classification of errors in sleep–wake discrimination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4139737/ /pubmed/25191278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00099 Text en Copyright © 2014 Galland, Meredith-Jones, Terrill and Taylor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Galland, Barbara Meredith-Jones, Kim Terrill, Philip Taylor, Rachael Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy |
title | Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy |
title_full | Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy |
title_fullStr | Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy |
title_short | Challenges and Emerging Technologies within the Field of Pediatric Actigraphy |
title_sort | challenges and emerging technologies within the field of pediatric actigraphy |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25191278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gallandbarbara challengesandemergingtechnologieswithinthefieldofpediatricactigraphy AT meredithjoneskim challengesandemergingtechnologieswithinthefieldofpediatricactigraphy AT terrillphilip challengesandemergingtechnologieswithinthefieldofpediatricactigraphy AT taylorrachael challengesandemergingtechnologieswithinthefieldofpediatricactigraphy |