Cargando…

Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development

OBJECTIVES: New guidelines require preceptors to deliver approximately 30% of the doctor of pharmacy curricula. With preceptor’s increasing responsibilities, colleges are faced with the task of training preceptors as educators. Identifying preceptor’s training format preferences (i.e. electronic vs....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davison, Machelle, Medina, Melissa S., Ray, Nancy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25147592
_version_ 1782331407880683520
author Davison, Machelle
Medina, Melissa S.
Ray, Nancy E.
author_facet Davison, Machelle
Medina, Melissa S.
Ray, Nancy E.
author_sort Davison, Machelle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: New guidelines require preceptors to deliver approximately 30% of the doctor of pharmacy curricula. With preceptor’s increasing responsibilities, colleges are faced with the task of training preceptors as educators. Identifying preceptor’s training format preferences (i.e. electronic vs. live) should contribute to the more effective and efficient creation of training materials and programs. METHODS: A preceptor training video was created and made available electronically and was distributed to 400 preceptors with a brief 2-part questionnaire about preceptor training preferences, electronic training preferences after viewing the video, and available technology resources for participating in electronic training. RESULTS: 38.25% of the questionnaires were returned. The majority of respondents (57%) preferred electronic to live preceptor developing training and the majority (53%) had not previously attended the live annual preceptor development conference offered by the college. 51.6% participants reviewed the electronic training video created by the OU College of Pharmacy. Of the respondents who did not watch the video, 73% cited having too little time, problems accessing the video, or technical reasons for not watching the training video. The majority of responders in all age groups preferred electronic training to face-to-face training except those ages 61-65 and the majority (55.7%) would participate in on-line training again in the future. The majority of respondents have the technical resources to participate in electronic training. CONCLUSION: Preceptors have limited time to participate in preceptor development training, although they view training as an important activity. This study reveals three main findings: (1) the majority of preceptors prefer electronic preceptor development training programs regardless of age; (2) would participate in future electronic training after having participated in electronic training; and (3) have the available resources to participate in electronic training. Future preceptor development programs should have flexible formats to accommodate preferences for live and electronic programming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4139756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41397562014-08-21 Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development Davison, Machelle Medina, Melissa S. Ray, Nancy E. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVES: New guidelines require preceptors to deliver approximately 30% of the doctor of pharmacy curricula. With preceptor’s increasing responsibilities, colleges are faced with the task of training preceptors as educators. Identifying preceptor’s training format preferences (i.e. electronic vs. live) should contribute to the more effective and efficient creation of training materials and programs. METHODS: A preceptor training video was created and made available electronically and was distributed to 400 preceptors with a brief 2-part questionnaire about preceptor training preferences, electronic training preferences after viewing the video, and available technology resources for participating in electronic training. RESULTS: 38.25% of the questionnaires were returned. The majority of respondents (57%) preferred electronic to live preceptor developing training and the majority (53%) had not previously attended the live annual preceptor development conference offered by the college. 51.6% participants reviewed the electronic training video created by the OU College of Pharmacy. Of the respondents who did not watch the video, 73% cited having too little time, problems accessing the video, or technical reasons for not watching the training video. The majority of responders in all age groups preferred electronic training to face-to-face training except those ages 61-65 and the majority (55.7%) would participate in on-line training again in the future. The majority of respondents have the technical resources to participate in electronic training. CONCLUSION: Preceptors have limited time to participate in preceptor development training, although they view training as an important activity. This study reveals three main findings: (1) the majority of preceptors prefer electronic preceptor development training programs regardless of age; (2) would participate in future electronic training after having participated in electronic training; and (3) have the available resources to participate in electronic training. Future preceptor development programs should have flexible formats to accommodate preferences for live and electronic programming. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2009 2009-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4139756/ /pubmed/25147592 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Davison, Machelle
Medina, Melissa S.
Ray, Nancy E.
Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
title Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
title_full Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
title_fullStr Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
title_full_unstemmed Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
title_short Preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
title_sort preceptor preferences for participating in electronic preceptor development
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25147592
work_keys_str_mv AT davisonmachelle preceptorpreferencesforparticipatinginelectronicpreceptordevelopment
AT medinamelissas preceptorpreferencesforparticipatinginelectronicpreceptordevelopment
AT raynancye preceptorpreferencesforparticipatinginelectronicpreceptordevelopment