Cargando…

Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical features, operative findings and post-operative complications in patients operated for non-traumatic ileal perforation and to discuss the role of typhoid vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out from 2009-2010. Seven patients were adm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Gurjit, Dogra, Bharat Bhushan, Jindal, Neha, Rejintal, Santhosh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161970
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.137633
_version_ 1782331448304336896
author Singh, Gurjit
Dogra, Bharat Bhushan
Jindal, Neha
Rejintal, Santhosh
author_facet Singh, Gurjit
Dogra, Bharat Bhushan
Jindal, Neha
Rejintal, Santhosh
author_sort Singh, Gurjit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical features, operative findings and post-operative complications in patients operated for non-traumatic ileal perforation and to discuss the role of typhoid vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out from 2009-2010. Seven patients were admitted through casualty as cases of acute abdomen. Underlying conditions were typhoid ulcers (4 patients) and non-specific etiology (3 patients). Diagnosis was made on clinical grounds, laboratory investigations, radiology and operative findings. Exploratory laporotomy was done. Different variables studied post-operatively were wound infection, residual abscess, recurrence and delayed post-operative complications. RESULTS: Tenderness, distension and rigidity were found in maximum patients. Gases under diaphragm and air fluid levels were common radiological findings. However, widal test and blood culture for S. typhi was positive in four patients. Six patients had single perforation and one patient had two perforations, all being on antimesentric border of ileum. Maximum patients had peritoneal collection of less than 1000 ml. In five patients simple closure of perforation was done and in remaining two resection with end to side ileotransverse anatomosis was required. Wound infection and residual intraabdominal abscess were found in one patient each. CONCLUSION: Management criteria remain same in typhoid and non-specific perforations. Commonest cause of ileal perforation is typhoid fever in our country, so immunization against typhoid beyond 18 years of age is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4139993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41399932014-08-26 Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study Singh, Gurjit Dogra, Bharat Bhushan Jindal, Neha Rejintal, Santhosh J Family Med Prim Care Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical features, operative findings and post-operative complications in patients operated for non-traumatic ileal perforation and to discuss the role of typhoid vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out from 2009-2010. Seven patients were admitted through casualty as cases of acute abdomen. Underlying conditions were typhoid ulcers (4 patients) and non-specific etiology (3 patients). Diagnosis was made on clinical grounds, laboratory investigations, radiology and operative findings. Exploratory laporotomy was done. Different variables studied post-operatively were wound infection, residual abscess, recurrence and delayed post-operative complications. RESULTS: Tenderness, distension and rigidity were found in maximum patients. Gases under diaphragm and air fluid levels were common radiological findings. However, widal test and blood culture for S. typhi was positive in four patients. Six patients had single perforation and one patient had two perforations, all being on antimesentric border of ileum. Maximum patients had peritoneal collection of less than 1000 ml. In five patients simple closure of perforation was done and in remaining two resection with end to side ileotransverse anatomosis was required. Wound infection and residual intraabdominal abscess were found in one patient each. CONCLUSION: Management criteria remain same in typhoid and non-specific perforations. Commonest cause of ileal perforation is typhoid fever in our country, so immunization against typhoid beyond 18 years of age is recommended. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4139993/ /pubmed/25161970 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.137633 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Gurjit
Dogra, Bharat Bhushan
Jindal, Neha
Rejintal, Santhosh
Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study
title Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study
title_full Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study
title_short Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: A Retrospective Study
title_sort non-traumatic ileal perforation: a retrospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161970
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.137633
work_keys_str_mv AT singhgurjit nontraumaticilealperforationaretrospectivestudy
AT dograbharatbhushan nontraumaticilealperforationaretrospectivestudy
AT jindalneha nontraumaticilealperforationaretrospectivestudy
AT rejintalsanthosh nontraumaticilealperforationaretrospectivestudy