Cargando…

Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation

Although penile implantation remains a final solution for patients with refractory impotence, undesirable postoperative effects, including penile size reduction and cold sensation of the glans penis, remain problematic. We report results of a surgical method designed to avoid these problems. From 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Geng-Long, Hill, James W., Hsieh, Cheng-Hsing, Liu, Shih-Ping, Hsu, Chih-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/923171
_version_ 1782331479130374144
author Hsu, Geng-Long
Hill, James W.
Hsieh, Cheng-Hsing
Liu, Shih-Ping
Hsu, Chih-Yuan
author_facet Hsu, Geng-Long
Hill, James W.
Hsieh, Cheng-Hsing
Liu, Shih-Ping
Hsu, Chih-Yuan
author_sort Hsu, Geng-Long
collection PubMed
description Although penile implantation remains a final solution for patients with refractory impotence, undesirable postoperative effects, including penile size reduction and cold sensation of the glans penis, remain problematic. We report results of a surgical method designed to avoid these problems. From 2003 to 2013, 35 consecutive patients received a malleable penile implant. Of these, 15 men (the enhancing group) were also treated with venous ligation of the retrocoronal venous plexus, deep dorsal vein, and cavernosal veins. The remaining 20 men formed the control group, treated with only a penile implant. Follow-up ranged from 1.1 to 10.0 years, with an average of 6.7 ± 1.5 years. Although preoperative glanular dimension did not differ significantly between the two groups, significant respective difference at one day and one year postoperatively was found in the glanular circumference (128.8 ± 6.8 mm versus 115.3 ± 7.2 mm and 130.6 ± 7.2 mm versus 100.5 ± 7.3 mm; both P<0.05), radius (38.8 ± 2.7 mm versus 37.1 ± 2.8 mm and 41.5 ± 2.6 mm versus 33.8 ± 2.9 mm; latter P<0.01), and satisfaction rate (91.7% versus 53.3%, P<0.01) as well. Based on our results, selective venous ligation appears to enhance the glans penis dimension in implant patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4140147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41401472014-08-27 Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation Hsu, Geng-Long Hill, James W. Hsieh, Cheng-Hsing Liu, Shih-Ping Hsu, Chih-Yuan Biomed Res Int Research Article Although penile implantation remains a final solution for patients with refractory impotence, undesirable postoperative effects, including penile size reduction and cold sensation of the glans penis, remain problematic. We report results of a surgical method designed to avoid these problems. From 2003 to 2013, 35 consecutive patients received a malleable penile implant. Of these, 15 men (the enhancing group) were also treated with venous ligation of the retrocoronal venous plexus, deep dorsal vein, and cavernosal veins. The remaining 20 men formed the control group, treated with only a penile implant. Follow-up ranged from 1.1 to 10.0 years, with an average of 6.7 ± 1.5 years. Although preoperative glanular dimension did not differ significantly between the two groups, significant respective difference at one day and one year postoperatively was found in the glanular circumference (128.8 ± 6.8 mm versus 115.3 ± 7.2 mm and 130.6 ± 7.2 mm versus 100.5 ± 7.3 mm; both P<0.05), radius (38.8 ± 2.7 mm versus 37.1 ± 2.8 mm and 41.5 ± 2.6 mm versus 33.8 ± 2.9 mm; latter P<0.01), and satisfaction rate (91.7% versus 53.3%, P<0.01) as well. Based on our results, selective venous ligation appears to enhance the glans penis dimension in implant patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4140147/ /pubmed/25165719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/923171 Text en Copyright © 2014 Geng-Long Hsu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hsu, Geng-Long
Hill, James W.
Hsieh, Cheng-Hsing
Liu, Shih-Ping
Hsu, Chih-Yuan
Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_fullStr Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_short Venous Ligation: A Novel Strategy for Glans Enhancement in Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_sort venous ligation: a novel strategy for glans enhancement in penile prosthesis implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/923171
work_keys_str_mv AT hsugenglong venousligationanovelstrategyforglansenhancementinpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT hilljamesw venousligationanovelstrategyforglansenhancementinpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT hsiehchenghsing venousligationanovelstrategyforglansenhancementinpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT liushihping venousligationanovelstrategyforglansenhancementinpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT hsuchihyuan venousligationanovelstrategyforglansenhancementinpenileprosthesisimplantation