Cargando…
Using Argumentation Theory to Identify the Challenges of Shared Decision-Making when the Doctor and the Patient have a Difference of Opinion
This paper aims to identify the challenges in the implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion. It analyses the preconditions of the resolution of this difference of opinion by using an analytical and normative framework known in the fie...
Autores principales: | Zanini, Claudia A., Rubinelli, Sara |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170461 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2012.e26 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Communicating statin evidence to support shared decision-making
por: Barrett, Bruce, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences
por: Elwyn, Glyn, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions
por: Elwyn, Glyn, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments—time to begin improving quality
por: Elf, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Combining value of information analysis and ethical argumentation in decisions on participation of vulnerable patients in clinical research
por: van der Wilt, Gert J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)