Cargando…

Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators

OBJECTIVE: 1) To evaluate the participation rate and identify the practical barriers to implementing a community pharmacist-led medication review service in francophone Switzerland and, 2) To assess the effectiveness of external support. METHODS: A qualitative survey was undertaken to identify barri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niquille, Anne, Lattmann, Chantal, Bugnon, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25152791
_version_ 1782331528385134592
author Niquille, Anne
Lattmann, Chantal
Bugnon, Olivier
author_facet Niquille, Anne
Lattmann, Chantal
Bugnon, Olivier
author_sort Niquille, Anne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: 1) To evaluate the participation rate and identify the practical barriers to implementing a community pharmacist-led medication review service in francophone Switzerland and, 2) To assess the effectiveness of external support. METHODS: A qualitative survey was undertaken to identify barriers to patient inclusion and medication review delivery in daily practice among all contactable independent pharmacists working in francophone Switzerland (n=78) who were members of a virtual chain (pharmacieplus), regardless of their participation in a simultaneous cross-sectional study. This study analyzed the dissemination of a medication review service including a prescription and drug utilization review with access to clinical data, a patient interview and a pharmaceutical report to the physicians. In addition, we observed an exploratory and external coaching for pharmacists that we launched seven months after the beginning of the cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Poor motivation on the part of pharmacists and difficulties communicating with physicians and patients were the primary obstacles identified. Lack of time and lack of self-confidence in administering the medication review process were the most commonly perceived practical barriers to the implementation of the new service. The main facilitators to overcome these issues may be well-planned workflow organization techniques, strengthened by an adequate remuneration scheme and a comprehensive and practice-based training course that includes skill-building in pharmacotherapy and communication. External support may partially compensate for a weak organizational framework. CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate the implementation of a medication review service, a strong local networking with physicians, an effective workflow management and a practice- and communications-focused training for pharmacists and their teams seem key elements required. External support can be useful to help some pharmacists improve their service management skills. Adequate remuneration seems necessary to encourage initial investments to provide such a service. Future research in this area may help improve the process and design of training programs, as well as the monitoring of implementation for each new pharmaceutical service.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4140575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41405752014-08-22 Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators Niquille, Anne Lattmann, Chantal Bugnon, Olivier Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: 1) To evaluate the participation rate and identify the practical barriers to implementing a community pharmacist-led medication review service in francophone Switzerland and, 2) To assess the effectiveness of external support. METHODS: A qualitative survey was undertaken to identify barriers to patient inclusion and medication review delivery in daily practice among all contactable independent pharmacists working in francophone Switzerland (n=78) who were members of a virtual chain (pharmacieplus), regardless of their participation in a simultaneous cross-sectional study. This study analyzed the dissemination of a medication review service including a prescription and drug utilization review with access to clinical data, a patient interview and a pharmaceutical report to the physicians. In addition, we observed an exploratory and external coaching for pharmacists that we launched seven months after the beginning of the cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Poor motivation on the part of pharmacists and difficulties communicating with physicians and patients were the primary obstacles identified. Lack of time and lack of self-confidence in administering the medication review process were the most commonly perceived practical barriers to the implementation of the new service. The main facilitators to overcome these issues may be well-planned workflow organization techniques, strengthened by an adequate remuneration scheme and a comprehensive and practice-based training course that includes skill-building in pharmacotherapy and communication. External support may partially compensate for a weak organizational framework. CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate the implementation of a medication review service, a strong local networking with physicians, an effective workflow management and a practice- and communications-focused training for pharmacists and their teams seem key elements required. External support can be useful to help some pharmacists improve their service management skills. Adequate remuneration seems necessary to encourage initial investments to provide such a service. Future research in this area may help improve the process and design of training programs, as well as the monitoring of implementation for each new pharmaceutical service. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2010 2010-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4140575/ /pubmed/25152791 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Niquille, Anne
Lattmann, Chantal
Bugnon, Olivier
Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators
title Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators
title_full Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators
title_fullStr Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators
title_full_unstemmed Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators
title_short Medication reviews led by community pharmacists in Switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators
title_sort medication reviews led by community pharmacists in switzerland: a qualitative survey to evaluate barriers and facilitators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25152791
work_keys_str_mv AT niquilleanne medicationreviewsledbycommunitypharmacistsinswitzerlandaqualitativesurveytoevaluatebarriersandfacilitators
AT lattmannchantal medicationreviewsledbycommunitypharmacistsinswitzerlandaqualitativesurveytoevaluatebarriersandfacilitators
AT bugnonolivier medicationreviewsledbycommunitypharmacistsinswitzerlandaqualitativesurveytoevaluatebarriersandfacilitators