Cargando…

Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal

BACKGROUND: In 2005, the Government of Senegal embarked on a campaign to eliminate a Glossina palpalis gambiensis population from the Niayes area (∼1000 km(2)) under the umbrella of the Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC). The project was considered an ecologically so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouyer, Fanny, Seck, Momar Talla, Dicko, Ahmadou H., Sall, Baba, Lo, Mbargou, Vreysen, Marc J. B., Chia, Eduardo, Bouyer, Jérémy, Wane, Abdrahmane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25144776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003112
_version_ 1782331539718144000
author Bouyer, Fanny
Seck, Momar Talla
Dicko, Ahmadou H.
Sall, Baba
Lo, Mbargou
Vreysen, Marc J. B.
Chia, Eduardo
Bouyer, Jérémy
Wane, Abdrahmane
author_facet Bouyer, Fanny
Seck, Momar Talla
Dicko, Ahmadou H.
Sall, Baba
Lo, Mbargou
Vreysen, Marc J. B.
Chia, Eduardo
Bouyer, Jérémy
Wane, Abdrahmane
author_sort Bouyer, Fanny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2005, the Government of Senegal embarked on a campaign to eliminate a Glossina palpalis gambiensis population from the Niayes area (∼1000 km(2)) under the umbrella of the Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC). The project was considered an ecologically sound approach to intensify cattle production. The elimination strategy includes a suppression phase using insecticide impregnated targets and cattle, and an elimination phase using the sterile insect technique, necessary to eliminate tsetse in this area. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Three main cattle farming systems were identified: a traditional system using trypanotolerant cattle and two “improved” systems using more productive cattle breeds focusing on milk and meat production. In improved farming systems herd size was 45% lower and annual cattle sales were €250 (s.d. 513) per head as compared to €74 (s.d. 38) per head in traditional farming systems (p<10(−3)). Tsetse distribution significantly impacted the occurrence of these farming systems (p = 0.001), with 34% (s.d. 4%) and 6% (s.d. 4%) of improved systems in the tsetse-free and tsetse-infested areas, respectively. We calculated the potential increases of cattle sales as a result of tsetse elimination considering two scenarios, i.e. a conservative scenario with a 2% annual replacement rate from traditional to improved systems after elimination, and a more realistic scenario with an increased replacement rate of 10% five years after elimination. The final annual increase of cattle sales was estimated at ∼€2800/km(2) for a total cost of the elimination campaign reaching ∼€6400/km(2). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite its high cost, the benefit-cost analysis indicated that the project was highly cost-effective, with Internal Rates of Return (IRR) of 9.8% and 19.1% and payback periods of 18 and 13 years for the two scenarios, respectively. In addition to an increase in farmers' income, the benefits of tsetse elimination include a reduction of grazing pressure on the ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4140673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41406732014-08-25 Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal Bouyer, Fanny Seck, Momar Talla Dicko, Ahmadou H. Sall, Baba Lo, Mbargou Vreysen, Marc J. B. Chia, Eduardo Bouyer, Jérémy Wane, Abdrahmane PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2005, the Government of Senegal embarked on a campaign to eliminate a Glossina palpalis gambiensis population from the Niayes area (∼1000 km(2)) under the umbrella of the Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC). The project was considered an ecologically sound approach to intensify cattle production. The elimination strategy includes a suppression phase using insecticide impregnated targets and cattle, and an elimination phase using the sterile insect technique, necessary to eliminate tsetse in this area. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Three main cattle farming systems were identified: a traditional system using trypanotolerant cattle and two “improved” systems using more productive cattle breeds focusing on milk and meat production. In improved farming systems herd size was 45% lower and annual cattle sales were €250 (s.d. 513) per head as compared to €74 (s.d. 38) per head in traditional farming systems (p<10(−3)). Tsetse distribution significantly impacted the occurrence of these farming systems (p = 0.001), with 34% (s.d. 4%) and 6% (s.d. 4%) of improved systems in the tsetse-free and tsetse-infested areas, respectively. We calculated the potential increases of cattle sales as a result of tsetse elimination considering two scenarios, i.e. a conservative scenario with a 2% annual replacement rate from traditional to improved systems after elimination, and a more realistic scenario with an increased replacement rate of 10% five years after elimination. The final annual increase of cattle sales was estimated at ∼€2800/km(2) for a total cost of the elimination campaign reaching ∼€6400/km(2). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite its high cost, the benefit-cost analysis indicated that the project was highly cost-effective, with Internal Rates of Return (IRR) of 9.8% and 19.1% and payback periods of 18 and 13 years for the two scenarios, respectively. In addition to an increase in farmers' income, the benefits of tsetse elimination include a reduction of grazing pressure on the ecosystems. Public Library of Science 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4140673/ /pubmed/25144776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003112 Text en © 2014 Bouyer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bouyer, Fanny
Seck, Momar Talla
Dicko, Ahmadou H.
Sall, Baba
Lo, Mbargou
Vreysen, Marc J. B.
Chia, Eduardo
Bouyer, Jérémy
Wane, Abdrahmane
Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal
title Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal
title_full Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal
title_fullStr Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal
title_full_unstemmed Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal
title_short Ex-ante Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis Population in the Niayes of Senegal
title_sort ex-ante benefit-cost analysis of the elimination of a glossina palpalis gambiensis population in the niayes of senegal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25144776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003112
work_keys_str_mv AT bouyerfanny exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT seckmomartalla exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT dickoahmadouh exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT sallbaba exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT lombargou exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT vreysenmarcjb exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT chiaeduardo exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT bouyerjeremy exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal
AT waneabdrahmane exantebenefitcostanalysisoftheeliminationofaglossinapalpalisgambiensispopulationintheniayesofsenegal