Cargando…
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery
INTRODUCTION: Like a fingerprint, ear shape is a unique personal feature that should be reconstructed with a high fidelity during reconstructive surgery. Ear cartilage tissue engineering (TE) advantageously offers the possibility to use novel 3D manufacturing techniques to reconstruct the ear, thus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25144306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104975 |
_version_ | 1782331554241970176 |
---|---|
author | Nimeskern, Luc Feldmann, Eva-Maria Kuo, Willy Schwarz, Silke Goldberg-Bockhorn, Eva Dürr, Susanne Müller, Ralph Rotter, Nicole Stok, Kathryn S. |
author_facet | Nimeskern, Luc Feldmann, Eva-Maria Kuo, Willy Schwarz, Silke Goldberg-Bockhorn, Eva Dürr, Susanne Müller, Ralph Rotter, Nicole Stok, Kathryn S. |
author_sort | Nimeskern, Luc |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Like a fingerprint, ear shape is a unique personal feature that should be reconstructed with a high fidelity during reconstructive surgery. Ear cartilage tissue engineering (TE) advantageously offers the possibility to use novel 3D manufacturing techniques to reconstruct the ear, thus allowing for a detailed auricular shape. However it also requires detailed patient-specific images of the 3D cartilage structures of the patient’s intact contralateral ear (if available). Therefore the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate an imaging strategy for acquiring patient-specific ear cartilage shape, with sufficient precision and accuracy for use in a clinical setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 14 volunteer and six cadaveric auricles and manually segmented. Reproducibility of cartilage volume (Cg.V), surface (Cg.S) and thickness (Cg.Th) was assessed, to determine whether raters could repeatedly define the same volume of interest. Additionally, six cadaveric auricles were harvested, scanned and segmented using the same procedure, then dissected and scanned using high resolution micro-CT. Correlation between MR and micro-CT measurements was assessed to determine accuracy. RESULTS: Good inter- and intra-rater reproducibility was observed (precision errors <4% for Cg.S and <9% for Cg.V and Cg.Th). Intraclass correlations were good for Cg.V and Cg.S (>0.82), but low for Cg.Th (<0.23) due to similar average Cg.Th between patients. However Pearson’s coefficients showed that the ability to detect local cartilage shape variations is unaffected. Good correlation between clinical MRI and micro-CT (r>0.95) demonstrated high accuracy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that precision and accuracy of the proposed method was high enough to detect patient-specific variation in ear cartilage geometry. The present study provides a clinical strategy to access the necessary information required for the production of 3D ear scaffolds for TE purposes, including detailed patient-specific shape. Furthermore, the protocol is applicable in daily clinical practice with existing infrastructure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4140740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41407402014-08-25 Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery Nimeskern, Luc Feldmann, Eva-Maria Kuo, Willy Schwarz, Silke Goldberg-Bockhorn, Eva Dürr, Susanne Müller, Ralph Rotter, Nicole Stok, Kathryn S. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Like a fingerprint, ear shape is a unique personal feature that should be reconstructed with a high fidelity during reconstructive surgery. Ear cartilage tissue engineering (TE) advantageously offers the possibility to use novel 3D manufacturing techniques to reconstruct the ear, thus allowing for a detailed auricular shape. However it also requires detailed patient-specific images of the 3D cartilage structures of the patient’s intact contralateral ear (if available). Therefore the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate an imaging strategy for acquiring patient-specific ear cartilage shape, with sufficient precision and accuracy for use in a clinical setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 14 volunteer and six cadaveric auricles and manually segmented. Reproducibility of cartilage volume (Cg.V), surface (Cg.S) and thickness (Cg.Th) was assessed, to determine whether raters could repeatedly define the same volume of interest. Additionally, six cadaveric auricles were harvested, scanned and segmented using the same procedure, then dissected and scanned using high resolution micro-CT. Correlation between MR and micro-CT measurements was assessed to determine accuracy. RESULTS: Good inter- and intra-rater reproducibility was observed (precision errors <4% for Cg.S and <9% for Cg.V and Cg.Th). Intraclass correlations were good for Cg.V and Cg.S (>0.82), but low for Cg.Th (<0.23) due to similar average Cg.Th between patients. However Pearson’s coefficients showed that the ability to detect local cartilage shape variations is unaffected. Good correlation between clinical MRI and micro-CT (r>0.95) demonstrated high accuracy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that precision and accuracy of the proposed method was high enough to detect patient-specific variation in ear cartilage geometry. The present study provides a clinical strategy to access the necessary information required for the production of 3D ear scaffolds for TE purposes, including detailed patient-specific shape. Furthermore, the protocol is applicable in daily clinical practice with existing infrastructure. Public Library of Science 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4140740/ /pubmed/25144306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104975 Text en © 2014 Nimeskern et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nimeskern, Luc Feldmann, Eva-Maria Kuo, Willy Schwarz, Silke Goldberg-Bockhorn, Eva Dürr, Susanne Müller, Ralph Rotter, Nicole Stok, Kathryn S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery |
title | Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery |
title_full | Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery |
title_fullStr | Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery |
title_short | Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ear for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Surgery |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging of the ear for patient-specific reconstructive surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25144306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nimeskernluc magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT feldmannevamaria magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT kuowilly magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT schwarzsilke magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT goldbergbockhorneva magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT durrsusanne magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT mullerralph magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT rotternicole magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery AT stokkathryns magneticresonanceimagingoftheearforpatientspecificreconstructivesurgery |