Cargando…

A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND: In cancer patients where gastrointestinal function is marginal and malnutrition significant enough to result in the requirement for intensive nutrition support, parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated. This longitudinal study examined the quality of life (QoL) and nutritional outcomes in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vashi, Pankaj G, Dahlk, Sadie, Popiel, Brenten, Lammersfeld, Carolyn A, Ireton-Jones, Carol, Gupta, Digant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-593
_version_ 1782331593688350720
author Vashi, Pankaj G
Dahlk, Sadie
Popiel, Brenten
Lammersfeld, Carolyn A
Ireton-Jones, Carol
Gupta, Digant
author_facet Vashi, Pankaj G
Dahlk, Sadie
Popiel, Brenten
Lammersfeld, Carolyn A
Ireton-Jones, Carol
Gupta, Digant
author_sort Vashi, Pankaj G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In cancer patients where gastrointestinal function is marginal and malnutrition significant enough to result in the requirement for intensive nutrition support, parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated. This longitudinal study examined the quality of life (QoL) and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home PN (HPN). METHODS: Fifty-two adult cancer patients (21 males, 31 females, average age 53 years) treated at a specialized cancer facility between April 2009 and November 2011 met criteria. QoL and nutritional status were measured at baseline and every month while on HPN using EORTC-QLQ-C30, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Repeated measures ANOVA and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were used to evaluate longitudinal changes in QoL and SGA. RESULTS: Cancer diagnoses included pancreatic (n = 14), colorectal (n = 11), ovarian (n = 6), appendix (n = 5), stomach (n = 4) and others (n = 12). Average weight loss 6-months prior to HPN was 13.2 kg (16.9%). Average weight at initiation of HPN was 62.2 kg. In patients with available follow-up data after 1 month (n = 39), there was a significant improvement in SGA, weight (61.5 to 63.1 kg; p = 0.03) and KPS (61.6 to 67.3; p = 0.01) from baseline. Similarly, after 2 months (n = 22), there was an improvement in global QoL (37.1 to 49.2; p = 0.02), SGA, weight (57.6 to 60 kg; p = 0.04) and KPS (63.2 to 73.2; p = 0.01) from baseline. Finally, after 3 months (n = 15), there was an improvement in global QoL (30.6 to 54.4; p = 0.02), SGA, weight (61.1 to 65.9 kg; p = 0.04) and KPS (64.0 to 78.7; p = 0.002) from baseline. Upon GEE analysis, every 1 month of HPN was associated with an increase of 6.3 points in global QoL (p<0.001), 1.3 kg in weight (p = 0.009) and 5.8 points in KPS (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HPN is associated with an improvement in QoL, KPS and nutritional status in advanced cancer patients, irrespective of their tumor type, who have compromised enteral intake and malnutrition. The greatest benefit was seen in patients with 3 months of HPN, although patients receiving HPN for 1 or 2 months also demonstrated significant improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4141117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41411172014-08-23 A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition Vashi, Pankaj G Dahlk, Sadie Popiel, Brenten Lammersfeld, Carolyn A Ireton-Jones, Carol Gupta, Digant BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: In cancer patients where gastrointestinal function is marginal and malnutrition significant enough to result in the requirement for intensive nutrition support, parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated. This longitudinal study examined the quality of life (QoL) and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home PN (HPN). METHODS: Fifty-two adult cancer patients (21 males, 31 females, average age 53 years) treated at a specialized cancer facility between April 2009 and November 2011 met criteria. QoL and nutritional status were measured at baseline and every month while on HPN using EORTC-QLQ-C30, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Repeated measures ANOVA and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were used to evaluate longitudinal changes in QoL and SGA. RESULTS: Cancer diagnoses included pancreatic (n = 14), colorectal (n = 11), ovarian (n = 6), appendix (n = 5), stomach (n = 4) and others (n = 12). Average weight loss 6-months prior to HPN was 13.2 kg (16.9%). Average weight at initiation of HPN was 62.2 kg. In patients with available follow-up data after 1 month (n = 39), there was a significant improvement in SGA, weight (61.5 to 63.1 kg; p = 0.03) and KPS (61.6 to 67.3; p = 0.01) from baseline. Similarly, after 2 months (n = 22), there was an improvement in global QoL (37.1 to 49.2; p = 0.02), SGA, weight (57.6 to 60 kg; p = 0.04) and KPS (63.2 to 73.2; p = 0.01) from baseline. Finally, after 3 months (n = 15), there was an improvement in global QoL (30.6 to 54.4; p = 0.02), SGA, weight (61.1 to 65.9 kg; p = 0.04) and KPS (64.0 to 78.7; p = 0.002) from baseline. Upon GEE analysis, every 1 month of HPN was associated with an increase of 6.3 points in global QoL (p<0.001), 1.3 kg in weight (p = 0.009) and 5.8 points in KPS (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HPN is associated with an improvement in QoL, KPS and nutritional status in advanced cancer patients, irrespective of their tumor type, who have compromised enteral intake and malnutrition. The greatest benefit was seen in patients with 3 months of HPN, although patients receiving HPN for 1 or 2 months also demonstrated significant improvements. BioMed Central 2014-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4141117/ /pubmed/25128023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-593 Text en © Vashi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vashi, Pankaj G
Dahlk, Sadie
Popiel, Brenten
Lammersfeld, Carolyn A
Ireton-Jones, Carol
Gupta, Digant
A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
title A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
title_full A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
title_fullStr A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
title_full_unstemmed A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
title_short A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
title_sort longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-593
work_keys_str_mv AT vashipankajg alongitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT dahlksadie alongitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT popielbrenten alongitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT lammersfeldcarolyna alongitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT iretonjonescarol alongitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT guptadigant alongitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT vashipankajg longitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT dahlksadie longitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT popielbrenten longitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT lammersfeldcarolyna longitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT iretonjonescarol longitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition
AT guptadigant longitudinalstudyinvestigatingqualityoflifeandnutritionaloutcomesinadvancedcancerpatientsreceivinghomeparenteralnutrition