Cargando…
The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study
It is debated whether the representation of objects in inferior temporal (IT) cortex is distributed over activities of many neurons or there are restricted islands of neurons responsive to a specific set of objects. There are lines of evidence demonstrating that fusiform face area (FFA-in human) pro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00078 |
_version_ | 1782331627708350464 |
---|---|
author | Ghodrati, Masoud Rajaei, Karim Ebrahimpour, Reza |
author_facet | Ghodrati, Masoud Rajaei, Karim Ebrahimpour, Reza |
author_sort | Ghodrati, Masoud |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is debated whether the representation of objects in inferior temporal (IT) cortex is distributed over activities of many neurons or there are restricted islands of neurons responsive to a specific set of objects. There are lines of evidence demonstrating that fusiform face area (FFA-in human) processes information related to specialized object recognition (here we say within category object recognition such as face identification). Physiological studies have also discovered several patches in monkey ventral temporal lobe that are responsible for facial processing. Neuronal recording from these patches shows that neurons are highly selective for face images whereas for other objects we do not see such selectivity in IT. However, it is also well-supported that objects are encoded through distributed patterns of neural activities that are distinctive for each object category. It seems that visual cortex utilize different mechanisms for between category object recognition (e.g., face vs. non-face objects) vs. within category object recognition (e.g., two different faces). In this study, we address this question with computational simulations. We use two biologically inspired object recognition models and define two experiments which address these issues. The models have a hierarchical structure of several processing layers that simply simulate visual processing from V1 to aIT. We show, through computational modeling, that the difference between these two mechanisms of recognition can underlie the visual feature and extraction mechanism. It is argued that in order to perform generic and specialized object recognition, visual cortex must separate the mechanisms involved in within category from between categories object recognition. High recognition performance in within category object recognition can be guaranteed when class-specific features with intermediate size and complexity are extracted. However, generic object recognition requires a distributed universal dictionary of visual features in which the size of features does not have significant difference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4141282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41412822014-09-08 The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study Ghodrati, Masoud Rajaei, Karim Ebrahimpour, Reza Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience It is debated whether the representation of objects in inferior temporal (IT) cortex is distributed over activities of many neurons or there are restricted islands of neurons responsive to a specific set of objects. There are lines of evidence demonstrating that fusiform face area (FFA-in human) processes information related to specialized object recognition (here we say within category object recognition such as face identification). Physiological studies have also discovered several patches in monkey ventral temporal lobe that are responsible for facial processing. Neuronal recording from these patches shows that neurons are highly selective for face images whereas for other objects we do not see such selectivity in IT. However, it is also well-supported that objects are encoded through distributed patterns of neural activities that are distinctive for each object category. It seems that visual cortex utilize different mechanisms for between category object recognition (e.g., face vs. non-face objects) vs. within category object recognition (e.g., two different faces). In this study, we address this question with computational simulations. We use two biologically inspired object recognition models and define two experiments which address these issues. The models have a hierarchical structure of several processing layers that simply simulate visual processing from V1 to aIT. We show, through computational modeling, that the difference between these two mechanisms of recognition can underlie the visual feature and extraction mechanism. It is argued that in order to perform generic and specialized object recognition, visual cortex must separate the mechanisms involved in within category from between categories object recognition. High recognition performance in within category object recognition can be guaranteed when class-specific features with intermediate size and complexity are extracted. However, generic object recognition requires a distributed universal dictionary of visual features in which the size of features does not have significant difference. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4141282/ /pubmed/25202259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00078 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ghodrati, Rajaei and Ebrahimpour. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ghodrati, Masoud Rajaei, Karim Ebrahimpour, Reza The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study |
title | The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study |
title_full | The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study |
title_fullStr | The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study |
title_short | The importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study |
title_sort | importance of visual features in generic vs. specialized object recognition: a computational study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghodratimasoud theimportanceofvisualfeaturesingenericvsspecializedobjectrecognitionacomputationalstudy AT rajaeikarim theimportanceofvisualfeaturesingenericvsspecializedobjectrecognitionacomputationalstudy AT ebrahimpourreza theimportanceofvisualfeaturesingenericvsspecializedobjectrecognitionacomputationalstudy AT ghodratimasoud importanceofvisualfeaturesingenericvsspecializedobjectrecognitionacomputationalstudy AT rajaeikarim importanceofvisualfeaturesingenericvsspecializedobjectrecognitionacomputationalstudy AT ebrahimpourreza importanceofvisualfeaturesingenericvsspecializedobjectrecognitionacomputationalstudy |