Cargando…
Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision making (EIDM); the use of research evidence with information about patient preferences, clinical context and resources, and their clinical expertise in decision making. Strategies for enhancing EIDM have been synthe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12043 |
_version_ | 1782331674852327424 |
---|---|
author | Yost, Jennifer Thompson, David Ganann, Rebecca Aloweni, Fazila Newman, Kristine McKibbon, Ann Dobbins, Maureen Ciliska, Donna |
author_facet | Yost, Jennifer Thompson, David Ganann, Rebecca Aloweni, Fazila Newman, Kristine McKibbon, Ann Dobbins, Maureen Ciliska, Donna |
author_sort | Yost, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision making (EIDM); the use of research evidence with information about patient preferences, clinical context and resources, and their clinical expertise in decision making. Strategies for enhancing EIDM have been synthesized in high-quality systematic reviews, yet most relate to physicians or mixed disciplines. Existing reviews, specific to nursing, have not captured a broad range of strategies for promoting the knowledge and skills for EIDM, patient outcomes as a result of EIDM, or contextual information for why these strategies “work.” AIM: To conduct a scoping review to identify and map the literature related to strategies implemented among nurses in tertiary care for promoting EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours, as well as patient outcomes and contextual implementation details. METHODS: A search strategy was developed and executed to identify relevant research evidence. Participants included registered nurses, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, and advanced practice nurses. Strategies were those enhancing nurses’ EIDM knowledge, skills, or behaviours, as well as patient outcomes. Relevant studies included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials (including controlled before and after studies), cluster non-randomized trials, interrupted time series designs, prospective cohort studies, mixed-method studies, and qualitative studies. Two reviewers performed study selection and data extraction using standardized forms. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or third party adjudication. RESULTS: Using a narrative synthesis, the body of research was mapped by design, clinical areas, strategies, and provider and patient outcomes to determine areas appropriate for a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: There are a sufficiently high number of studies to conduct a more focused systematic review by care settings, study design, implementation strategies, or outcomes. A focused review could assist in determining which strategies can be recommended for enhancing EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours among nurses in tertiary care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4141701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41417012014-09-08 Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review Yost, Jennifer Thompson, David Ganann, Rebecca Aloweni, Fazila Newman, Kristine McKibbon, Ann Dobbins, Maureen Ciliska, Donna Worldviews Evid Based Nurs Evidence Review BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision making (EIDM); the use of research evidence with information about patient preferences, clinical context and resources, and their clinical expertise in decision making. Strategies for enhancing EIDM have been synthesized in high-quality systematic reviews, yet most relate to physicians or mixed disciplines. Existing reviews, specific to nursing, have not captured a broad range of strategies for promoting the knowledge and skills for EIDM, patient outcomes as a result of EIDM, or contextual information for why these strategies “work.” AIM: To conduct a scoping review to identify and map the literature related to strategies implemented among nurses in tertiary care for promoting EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours, as well as patient outcomes and contextual implementation details. METHODS: A search strategy was developed and executed to identify relevant research evidence. Participants included registered nurses, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, and advanced practice nurses. Strategies were those enhancing nurses’ EIDM knowledge, skills, or behaviours, as well as patient outcomes. Relevant studies included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials (including controlled before and after studies), cluster non-randomized trials, interrupted time series designs, prospective cohort studies, mixed-method studies, and qualitative studies. Two reviewers performed study selection and data extraction using standardized forms. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or third party adjudication. RESULTS: Using a narrative synthesis, the body of research was mapped by design, clinical areas, strategies, and provider and patient outcomes to determine areas appropriate for a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: There are a sufficiently high number of studies to conduct a more focused systematic review by care settings, study design, implementation strategies, or outcomes. A focused review could assist in determining which strategies can be recommended for enhancing EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours among nurses in tertiary care. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-06 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4141701/ /pubmed/24934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12043 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Review Yost, Jennifer Thompson, David Ganann, Rebecca Aloweni, Fazila Newman, Kristine McKibbon, Ann Dobbins, Maureen Ciliska, Donna Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review |
title | Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | knowledge translation strategies for enhancing nurses’ evidence-informed decision making: a scoping review |
topic | Evidence Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yostjennifer knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview AT thompsondavid knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview AT ganannrebecca knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview AT alowenifazila knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview AT newmankristine knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview AT mckibbonann knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview AT dobbinsmaureen knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview AT ciliskadonna knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview |