Cargando…

Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision making (EIDM); the use of research evidence with information about patient preferences, clinical context and resources, and their clinical expertise in decision making. Strategies for enhancing EIDM have been synthe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yost, Jennifer, Thompson, David, Ganann, Rebecca, Aloweni, Fazila, Newman, Kristine, McKibbon, Ann, Dobbins, Maureen, Ciliska, Donna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24934565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12043
_version_ 1782331674852327424
author Yost, Jennifer
Thompson, David
Ganann, Rebecca
Aloweni, Fazila
Newman, Kristine
McKibbon, Ann
Dobbins, Maureen
Ciliska, Donna
author_facet Yost, Jennifer
Thompson, David
Ganann, Rebecca
Aloweni, Fazila
Newman, Kristine
McKibbon, Ann
Dobbins, Maureen
Ciliska, Donna
author_sort Yost, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision making (EIDM); the use of research evidence with information about patient preferences, clinical context and resources, and their clinical expertise in decision making. Strategies for enhancing EIDM have been synthesized in high-quality systematic reviews, yet most relate to physicians or mixed disciplines. Existing reviews, specific to nursing, have not captured a broad range of strategies for promoting the knowledge and skills for EIDM, patient outcomes as a result of EIDM, or contextual information for why these strategies “work.” AIM: To conduct a scoping review to identify and map the literature related to strategies implemented among nurses in tertiary care for promoting EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours, as well as patient outcomes and contextual implementation details. METHODS: A search strategy was developed and executed to identify relevant research evidence. Participants included registered nurses, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, and advanced practice nurses. Strategies were those enhancing nurses’ EIDM knowledge, skills, or behaviours, as well as patient outcomes. Relevant studies included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials (including controlled before and after studies), cluster non-randomized trials, interrupted time series designs, prospective cohort studies, mixed-method studies, and qualitative studies. Two reviewers performed study selection and data extraction using standardized forms. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or third party adjudication. RESULTS: Using a narrative synthesis, the body of research was mapped by design, clinical areas, strategies, and provider and patient outcomes to determine areas appropriate for a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: There are a sufficiently high number of studies to conduct a more focused systematic review by care settings, study design, implementation strategies, or outcomes. A focused review could assist in determining which strategies can be recommended for enhancing EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours among nurses in tertiary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4141701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41417012014-09-08 Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review Yost, Jennifer Thompson, David Ganann, Rebecca Aloweni, Fazila Newman, Kristine McKibbon, Ann Dobbins, Maureen Ciliska, Donna Worldviews Evid Based Nurs Evidence Review BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision making (EIDM); the use of research evidence with information about patient preferences, clinical context and resources, and their clinical expertise in decision making. Strategies for enhancing EIDM have been synthesized in high-quality systematic reviews, yet most relate to physicians or mixed disciplines. Existing reviews, specific to nursing, have not captured a broad range of strategies for promoting the knowledge and skills for EIDM, patient outcomes as a result of EIDM, or contextual information for why these strategies “work.” AIM: To conduct a scoping review to identify and map the literature related to strategies implemented among nurses in tertiary care for promoting EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours, as well as patient outcomes and contextual implementation details. METHODS: A search strategy was developed and executed to identify relevant research evidence. Participants included registered nurses, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, and advanced practice nurses. Strategies were those enhancing nurses’ EIDM knowledge, skills, or behaviours, as well as patient outcomes. Relevant studies included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials (including controlled before and after studies), cluster non-randomized trials, interrupted time series designs, prospective cohort studies, mixed-method studies, and qualitative studies. Two reviewers performed study selection and data extraction using standardized forms. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or third party adjudication. RESULTS: Using a narrative synthesis, the body of research was mapped by design, clinical areas, strategies, and provider and patient outcomes to determine areas appropriate for a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: There are a sufficiently high number of studies to conduct a more focused systematic review by care settings, study design, implementation strategies, or outcomes. A focused review could assist in determining which strategies can be recommended for enhancing EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours among nurses in tertiary care. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-06 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4141701/ /pubmed/24934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12043 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Evidence Review
Yost, Jennifer
Thompson, David
Ganann, Rebecca
Aloweni, Fazila
Newman, Kristine
McKibbon, Ann
Dobbins, Maureen
Ciliska, Donna
Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
title Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
title_full Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
title_short Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
title_sort knowledge translation strategies for enhancing nurses’ evidence-informed decision making: a scoping review
topic Evidence Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24934565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12043
work_keys_str_mv AT yostjennifer knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview
AT thompsondavid knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview
AT ganannrebecca knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview
AT alowenifazila knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview
AT newmankristine knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview
AT mckibbonann knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview
AT dobbinsmaureen knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview
AT ciliskadonna knowledgetranslationstrategiesforenhancingnursesevidenceinformeddecisionmakingascopingreview