Cargando…

Time perception: the bad news and the good

Time perception is fundamental and heavily researched, but the field faces a number of obstacles to theoretical progress. In this advanced review, we focus on three pieces of ‘bad news’ for time perception research: temporal perception is highly labile across changes in experimental context and task...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, William J, Meck, Warren H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1298
_version_ 1782331728360112128
author Matthews, William J
Meck, Warren H
author_facet Matthews, William J
Meck, Warren H
author_sort Matthews, William J
collection PubMed
description Time perception is fundamental and heavily researched, but the field faces a number of obstacles to theoretical progress. In this advanced review, we focus on three pieces of ‘bad news’ for time perception research: temporal perception is highly labile across changes in experimental context and task; there are pronounced individual differences not just in overall performance but in the use of different timing strategies and the effect of key variables; and laboratory studies typically bear little relation to timing in the ‘real world’. We describe recent examples of these issues and in each case offer some ‘good news’ by showing how new research is addressing these challenges to provide rich insights into the neural and information-processing bases of timing and time perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4142010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41420102014-09-08 Time perception: the bad news and the good Matthews, William J Meck, Warren H Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci Advanced Reviews Time perception is fundamental and heavily researched, but the field faces a number of obstacles to theoretical progress. In this advanced review, we focus on three pieces of ‘bad news’ for time perception research: temporal perception is highly labile across changes in experimental context and task; there are pronounced individual differences not just in overall performance but in the use of different timing strategies and the effect of key variables; and laboratory studies typically bear little relation to timing in the ‘real world’. We describe recent examples of these issues and in each case offer some ‘good news’ by showing how new research is addressing these challenges to provide rich insights into the neural and information-processing bases of timing and time perception. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2014-07 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4142010/ /pubmed/25210578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1298 Text en © 2014 The Authors. WIREs Cognitive Science published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Advanced Reviews
Matthews, William J
Meck, Warren H
Time perception: the bad news and the good
title Time perception: the bad news and the good
title_full Time perception: the bad news and the good
title_fullStr Time perception: the bad news and the good
title_full_unstemmed Time perception: the bad news and the good
title_short Time perception: the bad news and the good
title_sort time perception: the bad news and the good
topic Advanced Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1298
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewswilliamj timeperceptionthebadnewsandthegood
AT meckwarrenh timeperceptionthebadnewsandthegood