Cargando…
Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that the episiotomy rate should be around 10%, which is already a reality in many European countries. Currently the use of episiotomy should be restricted and physicians are encouraged to use their clinical judgment to decide when the procedure...
Autores principales: | Melo, Inês, Katz, Leila, Coutinho, Isabela, Amorim, Melania Maria |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25124938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-66 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction to: Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
por: Amorim, Melania M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
por: M. Amorim, M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Brazilian Obstetricians Regarding Episiotomy
por: Cunha, Carolina Maria Pires, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Once episiotomy, always episiotomy?
por: Zilberman, Ayala, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Diuretics vs. placebo for postpartum blood pressure control in preeclampsia (DIUPRE): a randomized clinical trial
por: Cursino, Telma, et al.
Publicado: (2015)