Cargando…

Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of ambient glucose on quantitative analysis of hepatic tumors on 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and to establish a method for glucose correction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with hepatic lesions ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jolepalem, Prashant, Flynt, Lesley, Rydberg, John N., Wong, Ching-Yee Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161808
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.137832
_version_ 1782331782903889920
author Jolepalem, Prashant
Flynt, Lesley
Rydberg, John N.
Wong, Ching-Yee Oliver
author_facet Jolepalem, Prashant
Flynt, Lesley
Rydberg, John N.
Wong, Ching-Yee Oliver
author_sort Jolepalem, Prashant
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of ambient glucose on quantitative analysis of hepatic tumors on 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and to establish a method for glucose correction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with hepatic lesions identified on (18)FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) were analyzed. The serum glucose level (Glc) was recorded prior to imaging, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) in the hepatic tumors and the average SUV in normal liver were determined. The inverse relationship of SUV to glucose can be defined as d (SUV)/d (Glc) = g*SUV/(Glc), where g is the glucose sensitivity. Simulations using glucose level from 70 to 250 mg/dl were performed to evaluate the effects of Glc on the maximum SUV of malignant hepatic lesions and normal liver. RESULTS: By logarithmic transformation and linear regression, g for metastasis was significantly higher than that for normal liver (−0.636 ± 0.144 vs. −0.0536 ± 0.0583; P = 0.00092). Simulation studies showed that the SUV in malignant lesions will decrease rapidly when Glc level is >120 mg/dl, while background liver remains relatively constant up to 250 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: The tumor FDG uptake is much more sensitive to ambient glucose level variation than the background liver. Therefore, correction by the glucose sensitivity factor will result in more accurate SUV measurements and make semi-quantitative analysis of (18)FDG PET scans more reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4142473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41424732014-08-26 Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging Jolepalem, Prashant Flynt, Lesley Rydberg, John N. Wong, Ching-Yee Oliver J Clin Imaging Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of ambient glucose on quantitative analysis of hepatic tumors on 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and to establish a method for glucose correction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with hepatic lesions identified on (18)FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) were analyzed. The serum glucose level (Glc) was recorded prior to imaging, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) in the hepatic tumors and the average SUV in normal liver were determined. The inverse relationship of SUV to glucose can be defined as d (SUV)/d (Glc) = g*SUV/(Glc), where g is the glucose sensitivity. Simulations using glucose level from 70 to 250 mg/dl were performed to evaluate the effects of Glc on the maximum SUV of malignant hepatic lesions and normal liver. RESULTS: By logarithmic transformation and linear regression, g for metastasis was significantly higher than that for normal liver (−0.636 ± 0.144 vs. −0.0536 ± 0.0583; P = 0.00092). Simulation studies showed that the SUV in malignant lesions will decrease rapidly when Glc level is >120 mg/dl, while background liver remains relatively constant up to 250 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: The tumor FDG uptake is much more sensitive to ambient glucose level variation than the background liver. Therefore, correction by the glucose sensitivity factor will result in more accurate SUV measurements and make semi-quantitative analysis of (18)FDG PET scans more reliable. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4142473/ /pubmed/25161808 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.137832 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Jolepalem P. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jolepalem, Prashant
Flynt, Lesley
Rydberg, John N.
Wong, Ching-Yee Oliver
Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging
title Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging
title_full Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging
title_fullStr Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging
title_short Implications of Ambient Glucose Variation on the Target-to-Background Ratio of Hepatic Tumors By (18)FDG-PET Imaging
title_sort implications of ambient glucose variation on the target-to-background ratio of hepatic tumors by (18)fdg-pet imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161808
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.137832
work_keys_str_mv AT jolepalemprashant implicationsofambientglucosevariationonthetargettobackgroundratioofhepatictumorsby18fdgpetimaging
AT flyntlesley implicationsofambientglucosevariationonthetargettobackgroundratioofhepatictumorsby18fdgpetimaging
AT rydbergjohnn implicationsofambientglucosevariationonthetargettobackgroundratioofhepatictumorsby18fdgpetimaging
AT wongchingyeeoliver implicationsofambientglucosevariationonthetargettobackgroundratioofhepatictumorsby18fdgpetimaging