Cargando…

Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures

PURPOSE: The rate of infection in patients having growth sparing surgery for early onset scoliosis has been reported up to 25 % during the course of treatment. A recent study demonstrated significant variability in the approach to infection prevention in adolescent and neuromuscular scoliosis. The p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glotzbecker, Michael P., Garg, Sumeet, Akbarnia, Behrooz A., Vitale, Michael, Hillaire, Tricia St, Joshi, Ajeya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1
_version_ 1782331828810547200
author Glotzbecker, Michael P.
Garg, Sumeet
Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
Vitale, Michael
Hillaire, Tricia St
Joshi, Ajeya
author_facet Glotzbecker, Michael P.
Garg, Sumeet
Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
Vitale, Michael
Hillaire, Tricia St
Joshi, Ajeya
author_sort Glotzbecker, Michael P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The rate of infection in patients having growth sparing surgery for early onset scoliosis has been reported up to 25 % during the course of treatment. A recent study demonstrated significant variability in the approach to infection prevention in adolescent and neuromuscular scoliosis. The purpose of this study is to conduct a similar survey in order to understand approaches used by experienced pediatric spinal surgeons with regard to infection prevention in growth friendly spinal procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After preliminary internal testing of a survey by the authors, a final 21-question survey was created and approved by the authors and electronically distributed to all members of the Chest Wall Spinal Deformity Study Group and the Growing Spine Study Group (n = 57). A total of 40 responses were obtained (70 %). RESULTS: Significant variability in practice was demonstrated across the majority of the questions answered. Several of the questions demonstrated relative equipoise between practices, including preoperative MRSA screening, preoperative chlorhexidine baths, postoperative antibiotic duration after insertion, use of topical antibiotics, use of drains, use of IV gram negative coverage or vancomycin, and skin preparation. CONCLUSION: Other studies have demonstrated that variability in practice may have a negative impact on clinical outcomes, so one could postulate that steps that can reduce variability in the current population may help improve outcomes in this population. Areas of clinical equipoise can be used to help design and direct multicenter studies with an ultimate goal of reducing infections in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4142892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41428922014-08-29 Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures Glotzbecker, Michael P. Garg, Sumeet Akbarnia, Behrooz A. Vitale, Michael Hillaire, Tricia St Joshi, Ajeya J Child Orthop Original Clinical Article PURPOSE: The rate of infection in patients having growth sparing surgery for early onset scoliosis has been reported up to 25 % during the course of treatment. A recent study demonstrated significant variability in the approach to infection prevention in adolescent and neuromuscular scoliosis. The purpose of this study is to conduct a similar survey in order to understand approaches used by experienced pediatric spinal surgeons with regard to infection prevention in growth friendly spinal procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After preliminary internal testing of a survey by the authors, a final 21-question survey was created and approved by the authors and electronically distributed to all members of the Chest Wall Spinal Deformity Study Group and the Growing Spine Study Group (n = 57). A total of 40 responses were obtained (70 %). RESULTS: Significant variability in practice was demonstrated across the majority of the questions answered. Several of the questions demonstrated relative equipoise between practices, including preoperative MRSA screening, preoperative chlorhexidine baths, postoperative antibiotic duration after insertion, use of topical antibiotics, use of drains, use of IV gram negative coverage or vancomycin, and skin preparation. CONCLUSION: Other studies have demonstrated that variability in practice may have a negative impact on clinical outcomes, so one could postulate that steps that can reduce variability in the current population may help improve outcomes in this population. Areas of clinical equipoise can be used to help design and direct multicenter studies with an ultimate goal of reducing infections in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-04-18 2014-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4142892/ /pubmed/24744235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Article
Glotzbecker, Michael P.
Garg, Sumeet
Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
Vitale, Michael
Hillaire, Tricia St
Joshi, Ajeya
Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures
title Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures
title_full Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures
title_fullStr Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures
title_full_unstemmed Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures
title_short Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures
title_sort surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures
topic Original Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1
work_keys_str_mv AT glotzbeckermichaelp surgeonpracticesregardinginfectionpreventionforgrowthfriendlyspinalprocedures
AT gargsumeet surgeonpracticesregardinginfectionpreventionforgrowthfriendlyspinalprocedures
AT akbarniabehrooza surgeonpracticesregardinginfectionpreventionforgrowthfriendlyspinalprocedures
AT vitalemichael surgeonpracticesregardinginfectionpreventionforgrowthfriendlyspinalprocedures
AT hillairetriciast surgeonpracticesregardinginfectionpreventionforgrowthfriendlyspinalprocedures
AT joshiajeya surgeonpracticesregardinginfectionpreventionforgrowthfriendlyspinalprocedures