Cargando…

The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages

BACKGROUND: To enable the release of only sterile male Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes for the sterile insect technique, the genetic background of a wild-type strain was modified to create a genetic sexing strain ANO IPCL1 that was based on a dieldrin resistance mutation. Secondly, the eggs of ANO I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamada, Hanano, Vreysen, Marc JB, Gilles, Jeremie RL, Munhenga, Givemore, Damiens, David D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25125089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-318
_version_ 1782331907484155904
author Yamada, Hanano
Vreysen, Marc JB
Gilles, Jeremie RL
Munhenga, Givemore
Damiens, David D
author_facet Yamada, Hanano
Vreysen, Marc JB
Gilles, Jeremie RL
Munhenga, Givemore
Damiens, David D
author_sort Yamada, Hanano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To enable the release of only sterile male Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes for the sterile insect technique, the genetic background of a wild-type strain was modified to create a genetic sexing strain ANO IPCL1 that was based on a dieldrin resistance mutation. Secondly, the eggs of ANO IPCL1 require treatment with dieldrin to allow complete elimination of female L1 larvae from the production line. Finally, male mosquito pupae need to be treated with an irradiation dose of 75 Gy for sterilization. The effects of these treatments on the competitiveness of male An. arabiensis were studied. METHODS: The competitiveness of ANO IPCL1 males that were treated either with irradiation or both dieldrin and irradiation, was compared with that of the wild-type strain (An. arabiensis Dongola) at a 1:1 ratio in 5.36 m(3) semi-field cages located in a climate-controlled greenhouse. In addition, three irradiated: untreated male ratios were tested in semi-field cages (1:1, 5:1 and 10:1) and their competition for virgin wild-type females was assessed. RESULTS: The ANO IPCL1 males were equally competitive as the wild-type males in this semi-field setting. The ANO IPCL1 males irradiated at 75 Gy were approximately half as competitive as the unirradiated wild-type males. ANO IPCL1 males that had been treated with dieldrin as eggs, and irradiated with 75 Gy as pupae were slightly more competitive than males that were only irradiated. Ratios of 1:1, 5:1 and 10:1 irradiated ANO IPCL1 males: untreated wild-type males resulted in 31, 66 and 81% induced sterility in the female cage population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An irradiation dose of 75 Gy reduced the competitiveness of male ANO IPCL1 significantly and will need to be compensated by releasing higher numbers of sterile males in the field. However, the dieldrin treatment used to eliminate females appears to have an unexpected radioprotectant effect, however the mechanism is not understood. A sterile to wild-type ratio of 10:1 effectively reduced the population’s fertility under the experimental field cage conditions, but further studies in the field will be needed to confirm the efficiency of sterile ANO IPCL1 males when competing against wild males for wild females.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4143545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41435452014-08-27 The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages Yamada, Hanano Vreysen, Marc JB Gilles, Jeremie RL Munhenga, Givemore Damiens, David D Malar J Research BACKGROUND: To enable the release of only sterile male Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes for the sterile insect technique, the genetic background of a wild-type strain was modified to create a genetic sexing strain ANO IPCL1 that was based on a dieldrin resistance mutation. Secondly, the eggs of ANO IPCL1 require treatment with dieldrin to allow complete elimination of female L1 larvae from the production line. Finally, male mosquito pupae need to be treated with an irradiation dose of 75 Gy for sterilization. The effects of these treatments on the competitiveness of male An. arabiensis were studied. METHODS: The competitiveness of ANO IPCL1 males that were treated either with irradiation or both dieldrin and irradiation, was compared with that of the wild-type strain (An. arabiensis Dongola) at a 1:1 ratio in 5.36 m(3) semi-field cages located in a climate-controlled greenhouse. In addition, three irradiated: untreated male ratios were tested in semi-field cages (1:1, 5:1 and 10:1) and their competition for virgin wild-type females was assessed. RESULTS: The ANO IPCL1 males were equally competitive as the wild-type males in this semi-field setting. The ANO IPCL1 males irradiated at 75 Gy were approximately half as competitive as the unirradiated wild-type males. ANO IPCL1 males that had been treated with dieldrin as eggs, and irradiated with 75 Gy as pupae were slightly more competitive than males that were only irradiated. Ratios of 1:1, 5:1 and 10:1 irradiated ANO IPCL1 males: untreated wild-type males resulted in 31, 66 and 81% induced sterility in the female cage population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An irradiation dose of 75 Gy reduced the competitiveness of male ANO IPCL1 significantly and will need to be compensated by releasing higher numbers of sterile males in the field. However, the dieldrin treatment used to eliminate females appears to have an unexpected radioprotectant effect, however the mechanism is not understood. A sterile to wild-type ratio of 10:1 effectively reduced the population’s fertility under the experimental field cage conditions, but further studies in the field will be needed to confirm the efficiency of sterile ANO IPCL1 males when competing against wild males for wild females. BioMed Central 2014-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4143545/ /pubmed/25125089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-318 Text en © Yamada et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Yamada, Hanano
Vreysen, Marc JB
Gilles, Jeremie RL
Munhenga, Givemore
Damiens, David D
The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages
title The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages
title_full The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages
title_fullStr The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages
title_full_unstemmed The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages
title_short The effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis in field cages
title_sort effects of genetic manipulation, dieldrin treatment and irradiation on the mating competitiveness of male anopheles arabiensis in field cages
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25125089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-318
work_keys_str_mv AT yamadahanano theeffectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT vreysenmarcjb theeffectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT gillesjeremierl theeffectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT munhengagivemore theeffectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT damiensdavidd theeffectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT yamadahanano effectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT vreysenmarcjb effectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT gillesjeremierl effectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT munhengagivemore effectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages
AT damiensdavidd effectsofgeneticmanipulationdieldrintreatmentandirradiationonthematingcompetitivenessofmaleanophelesarabiensisinfieldcages