Cargando…

Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine

Background: General anesthesia draws attention to the most commonly used modalities for post cesarean delivery pain relief in systemic administration of opioids, while the administration of small dose of intrathecal opioid during spinal anesthesia can be a possible alternative. The aim of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabiee, Seyed Mozaffar, Alijanpour, Ebrahim, Jabbari, Ali, Rostami, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202441
_version_ 1782331950324776960
author Rabiee, Seyed Mozaffar
Alijanpour, Ebrahim
Jabbari, Ali
Rostami, Sara
author_facet Rabiee, Seyed Mozaffar
Alijanpour, Ebrahim
Jabbari, Ali
Rostami, Sara
author_sort Rabiee, Seyed Mozaffar
collection PubMed
description Background: General anesthesia draws attention to the most commonly used modalities for post cesarean delivery pain relief in systemic administration of opioids, while the administration of small dose of intrathecal opioid during spinal anesthesia can be a possible alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of buprenorphine on cesarean section prescribed intrathecally. Methods: This double blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted in patients for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into case and control groups. Case group (208 patients) received 65-70 mg of 5% lidocaine plus 0.2 ml of buprenorphine while the same amount of 5% lidocaine diluted with 0.2 ml of normal saline was given to 234 cases in the control group. Hemodynamic changes and neonatal APGAR scores (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration) were recorded. Pain score was recorded according to the visual analog scale. This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of clinical Trials; IRCT2013022112552N1. Results: The mean age of case and control groups was 24.4±5.38 and 26.84±5.42 years, respectively. Systolic blood pressure was not significantly different until the 45th minute but diastolic blood pressure showed a significant difference at the 15th and the 60th minutes (P<0.001). Heart rate changes were significantly different between cases and controls at the initial 5th, 15th and after 60th minutes (P<0.001). Pain-free period was significantly different between two groups (1.25 h versus 18.73 h) (P<0.001). Conclusion: The results show that prescription of intratechal buprenorphine prolongs the duration of analgesia without any significant considerable side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4143735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41437352014-09-08 Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine Rabiee, Seyed Mozaffar Alijanpour, Ebrahim Jabbari, Ali Rostami, Sara Caspian J Intern Med Original Article Background: General anesthesia draws attention to the most commonly used modalities for post cesarean delivery pain relief in systemic administration of opioids, while the administration of small dose of intrathecal opioid during spinal anesthesia can be a possible alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of buprenorphine on cesarean section prescribed intrathecally. Methods: This double blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted in patients for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into case and control groups. Case group (208 patients) received 65-70 mg of 5% lidocaine plus 0.2 ml of buprenorphine while the same amount of 5% lidocaine diluted with 0.2 ml of normal saline was given to 234 cases in the control group. Hemodynamic changes and neonatal APGAR scores (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration) were recorded. Pain score was recorded according to the visual analog scale. This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of clinical Trials; IRCT2013022112552N1. Results: The mean age of case and control groups was 24.4±5.38 and 26.84±5.42 years, respectively. Systolic blood pressure was not significantly different until the 45th minute but diastolic blood pressure showed a significant difference at the 15th and the 60th minutes (P<0.001). Heart rate changes were significantly different between cases and controls at the initial 5th, 15th and after 60th minutes (P<0.001). Pain-free period was significantly different between two groups (1.25 h versus 18.73 h) (P<0.001). Conclusion: The results show that prescription of intratechal buprenorphine prolongs the duration of analgesia without any significant considerable side effects. Babol University of Medical Sciences 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4143735/ /pubmed/25202441 Text en © 2014: Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rabiee, Seyed Mozaffar
Alijanpour, Ebrahim
Jabbari, Ali
Rostami, Sara
Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine
title Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine
title_full Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine
title_fullStr Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine
title_short Benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine
title_sort benefits of using intrathecal buprenorphine
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202441
work_keys_str_mv AT rabieeseyedmozaffar benefitsofusingintrathecalbuprenorphine
AT alijanpourebrahim benefitsofusingintrathecalbuprenorphine
AT jabbariali benefitsofusingintrathecalbuprenorphine
AT rostamisara benefitsofusingintrathecalbuprenorphine