Cargando…

Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy

Background: The appropriate colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG solution for the afternoon colonos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baghbani, Kobra, Shokry-Shirvani, Javad, Taheri, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202444
_version_ 1782331951037808640
author Baghbani, Kobra
Shokry-Shirvani, Javad
Taheri, Hassan
author_facet Baghbani, Kobra
Shokry-Shirvani, Javad
Taheri, Hassan
author_sort Baghbani, Kobra
collection PubMed
description Background: The appropriate colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG solution for the afternoon colonoscopy. Methods: This comparative study compared the AM to PM prep for afternoon outpatient colonoscopy. The subjects randomly received PEG PM dose ;4 liters of water plus 4 pack PEG powder at 6 pm before colonoscopy (250 ml every 15 min) or AM ( the same dose solution at 6 am on the day of colonoscopy). The preparation and colonoscopy quality, PEG side effects, sleep quality, lesion detection, flush need and suction fluid were compared in these two groups. Results: One hundred seven cases received AM prep and 102 received PM prep. The colon prep was adequate in 94.4% in AM group and in 90.2% cases in PM group (P=0.2). The incidence of adverse events in these two groups was similar. Sleep quality and the need for flush was lower in the AM group (P=0.004 and P=0.03). The mean volume of suction fluid was higher in the AM group (P=0.01). The detected lesions were similar between the two groups. Adequate prep was associated with lower flush need in AM group (P=0.001). Conclusion: AM and PM PEG solutions were clinically equivalent with cleansing efficacy and side effect and lesion detection. AM group was associated with a better sleep quality and less flush need, but more suction fluid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4143738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41437382014-09-08 Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy Baghbani, Kobra Shokry-Shirvani, Javad Taheri, Hassan Caspian J Intern Med Original Article Background: The appropriate colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG solution for the afternoon colonoscopy. Methods: This comparative study compared the AM to PM prep for afternoon outpatient colonoscopy. The subjects randomly received PEG PM dose ;4 liters of water plus 4 pack PEG powder at 6 pm before colonoscopy (250 ml every 15 min) or AM ( the same dose solution at 6 am on the day of colonoscopy). The preparation and colonoscopy quality, PEG side effects, sleep quality, lesion detection, flush need and suction fluid were compared in these two groups. Results: One hundred seven cases received AM prep and 102 received PM prep. The colon prep was adequate in 94.4% in AM group and in 90.2% cases in PM group (P=0.2). The incidence of adverse events in these two groups was similar. Sleep quality and the need for flush was lower in the AM group (P=0.004 and P=0.03). The mean volume of suction fluid was higher in the AM group (P=0.01). The detected lesions were similar between the two groups. Adequate prep was associated with lower flush need in AM group (P=0.001). Conclusion: AM and PM PEG solutions were clinically equivalent with cleansing efficacy and side effect and lesion detection. AM group was associated with a better sleep quality and less flush need, but more suction fluid. Babol University of Medical Sciences 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4143738/ /pubmed/25202444 Text en © 2014: Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Baghbani, Kobra
Shokry-Shirvani, Javad
Taheri, Hassan
Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
title Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
title_full Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
title_fullStr Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
title_short Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
title_sort comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202444
work_keys_str_mv AT baghbanikobra comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsofcoloncleansingforafternooncolonoscopy
AT shokryshirvanijavad comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsofcoloncleansingforafternooncolonoscopy
AT taherihassan comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsofcoloncleansingforafternooncolonoscopy