Cargando…
Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy
Background: The appropriate colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG solution for the afternoon colonos...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Babol University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202444 |
_version_ | 1782331951037808640 |
---|---|
author | Baghbani, Kobra Shokry-Shirvani, Javad Taheri, Hassan |
author_facet | Baghbani, Kobra Shokry-Shirvani, Javad Taheri, Hassan |
author_sort | Baghbani, Kobra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The appropriate colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG solution for the afternoon colonoscopy. Methods: This comparative study compared the AM to PM prep for afternoon outpatient colonoscopy. The subjects randomly received PEG PM dose ;4 liters of water plus 4 pack PEG powder at 6 pm before colonoscopy (250 ml every 15 min) or AM ( the same dose solution at 6 am on the day of colonoscopy). The preparation and colonoscopy quality, PEG side effects, sleep quality, lesion detection, flush need and suction fluid were compared in these two groups. Results: One hundred seven cases received AM prep and 102 received PM prep. The colon prep was adequate in 94.4% in AM group and in 90.2% cases in PM group (P=0.2). The incidence of adverse events in these two groups was similar. Sleep quality and the need for flush was lower in the AM group (P=0.004 and P=0.03). The mean volume of suction fluid was higher in the AM group (P=0.01). The detected lesions were similar between the two groups. Adequate prep was associated with lower flush need in AM group (P=0.001). Conclusion: AM and PM PEG solutions were clinically equivalent with cleansing efficacy and side effect and lesion detection. AM group was associated with a better sleep quality and less flush need, but more suction fluid. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4143738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Babol University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41437382014-09-08 Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy Baghbani, Kobra Shokry-Shirvani, Javad Taheri, Hassan Caspian J Intern Med Original Article Background: The appropriate colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG solution for the afternoon colonoscopy. Methods: This comparative study compared the AM to PM prep for afternoon outpatient colonoscopy. The subjects randomly received PEG PM dose ;4 liters of water plus 4 pack PEG powder at 6 pm before colonoscopy (250 ml every 15 min) or AM ( the same dose solution at 6 am on the day of colonoscopy). The preparation and colonoscopy quality, PEG side effects, sleep quality, lesion detection, flush need and suction fluid were compared in these two groups. Results: One hundred seven cases received AM prep and 102 received PM prep. The colon prep was adequate in 94.4% in AM group and in 90.2% cases in PM group (P=0.2). The incidence of adverse events in these two groups was similar. Sleep quality and the need for flush was lower in the AM group (P=0.004 and P=0.03). The mean volume of suction fluid was higher in the AM group (P=0.01). The detected lesions were similar between the two groups. Adequate prep was associated with lower flush need in AM group (P=0.001). Conclusion: AM and PM PEG solutions were clinically equivalent with cleansing efficacy and side effect and lesion detection. AM group was associated with a better sleep quality and less flush need, but more suction fluid. Babol University of Medical Sciences 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4143738/ /pubmed/25202444 Text en © 2014: Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Baghbani, Kobra Shokry-Shirvani, Javad Taheri, Hassan Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy |
title | Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy |
title_full | Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy |
title_short | Comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy |
title_sort | comparison of two different methods of colon cleansing for afternoon-colonoscopy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baghbanikobra comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsofcoloncleansingforafternooncolonoscopy AT shokryshirvanijavad comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsofcoloncleansingforafternooncolonoscopy AT taherihassan comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsofcoloncleansingforafternooncolonoscopy |