Cargando…

Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases

BACKGROUND: Understanding the diversity of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in nature will provide insights for the improvement of cellulolytic enzyme cocktails used in the biofuels industry. Two families of enzymes, fungal AA9 and bacterial AA10, have recently been characterized as crystalline cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Book, Adam J, Yennamalli, Ragothaman M, Takasuka, Taichi E, Currie, Cameron R, Phillips, George N, Fox, Brian G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-109
_version_ 1782331997796958208
author Book, Adam J
Yennamalli, Ragothaman M
Takasuka, Taichi E
Currie, Cameron R
Phillips, George N
Fox, Brian G
author_facet Book, Adam J
Yennamalli, Ragothaman M
Takasuka, Taichi E
Currie, Cameron R
Phillips, George N
Fox, Brian G
author_sort Book, Adam J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding the diversity of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in nature will provide insights for the improvement of cellulolytic enzyme cocktails used in the biofuels industry. Two families of enzymes, fungal AA9 and bacterial AA10, have recently been characterized as crystalline cellulose or chitin-cleaving lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs). Here we analyze the sequences, structures, and evolution of LPMOs to understand the factors that may influence substrate specificity both within and between these enzyme families. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of sequences, solved structures, and homology models from AA9 and AA10 LPMO families demonstrated that, although these two LPMO families are highly conserved, structurally they have minimal sequence similarity outside the active site residues. Phylogenetic analysis of the AA10 family identified clades with putative chitinolytic and cellulolytic activities. Estimation of the rate of synonymous versus non-synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) within two major AA10 subclades showed distinct selective pressures between putative cellulolytic genes (subclade A) and CBP21-like chitinolytic genes (subclade D). Estimation of site-specific selection demonstrated that changes in the active sites were strongly negatively selected in all subclades. Furthermore, all codons in the subclade D had dN/dS values of less than 0.7, whereas codons in the cellulolytic subclade had dN/dS values of greater than 1.5. Positively selected codons were enriched at sites localized on the surface of the protein adjacent to the active site. CONCLUSIONS: The structural similarity but absence of significant sequence similarity between AA9 and AA10 families suggests that these enzyme families share an ancient ancestral protein. Combined analysis of amino acid sites under Darwinian selection and structural homology modeling identified a subclade of AA10 with diversifying selection at different surfaces, potentially used for cellulose-binding and protein-protein interactions. Together, these data indicate that AA10 LPMOs are under selection to change their function, which may optimize cellulolytic activity. This work provides a phylogenetic basis for identifying and classifying additional cellulolytic or chitinolytic LPMOs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-109) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4144037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41440372014-08-27 Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases Book, Adam J Yennamalli, Ragothaman M Takasuka, Taichi E Currie, Cameron R Phillips, George N Fox, Brian G Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Understanding the diversity of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in nature will provide insights for the improvement of cellulolytic enzyme cocktails used in the biofuels industry. Two families of enzymes, fungal AA9 and bacterial AA10, have recently been characterized as crystalline cellulose or chitin-cleaving lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs). Here we analyze the sequences, structures, and evolution of LPMOs to understand the factors that may influence substrate specificity both within and between these enzyme families. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of sequences, solved structures, and homology models from AA9 and AA10 LPMO families demonstrated that, although these two LPMO families are highly conserved, structurally they have minimal sequence similarity outside the active site residues. Phylogenetic analysis of the AA10 family identified clades with putative chitinolytic and cellulolytic activities. Estimation of the rate of synonymous versus non-synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) within two major AA10 subclades showed distinct selective pressures between putative cellulolytic genes (subclade A) and CBP21-like chitinolytic genes (subclade D). Estimation of site-specific selection demonstrated that changes in the active sites were strongly negatively selected in all subclades. Furthermore, all codons in the subclade D had dN/dS values of less than 0.7, whereas codons in the cellulolytic subclade had dN/dS values of greater than 1.5. Positively selected codons were enriched at sites localized on the surface of the protein adjacent to the active site. CONCLUSIONS: The structural similarity but absence of significant sequence similarity between AA9 and AA10 families suggests that these enzyme families share an ancient ancestral protein. Combined analysis of amino acid sites under Darwinian selection and structural homology modeling identified a subclade of AA10 with diversifying selection at different surfaces, potentially used for cellulose-binding and protein-protein interactions. Together, these data indicate that AA10 LPMOs are under selection to change their function, which may optimize cellulolytic activity. This work provides a phylogenetic basis for identifying and classifying additional cellulolytic or chitinolytic LPMOs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-109) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4144037/ /pubmed/25161697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-109 Text en © Book et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Book, Adam J
Yennamalli, Ragothaman M
Takasuka, Taichi E
Currie, Cameron R
Phillips, George N
Fox, Brian G
Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
title Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
title_full Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
title_fullStr Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
title_short Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
title_sort evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial aa10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-109
work_keys_str_mv AT bookadamj evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases
AT yennamalliragothamanm evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases
AT takasukataichie evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases
AT curriecameronr evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases
AT phillipsgeorgen evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases
AT foxbriang evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases