Cargando…
Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
BACKGROUND: Understanding the diversity of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in nature will provide insights for the improvement of cellulolytic enzyme cocktails used in the biofuels industry. Two families of enzymes, fungal AA9 and bacterial AA10, have recently been characterized as crystalline cell...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-109 |
_version_ | 1782331997796958208 |
---|---|
author | Book, Adam J Yennamalli, Ragothaman M Takasuka, Taichi E Currie, Cameron R Phillips, George N Fox, Brian G |
author_facet | Book, Adam J Yennamalli, Ragothaman M Takasuka, Taichi E Currie, Cameron R Phillips, George N Fox, Brian G |
author_sort | Book, Adam J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding the diversity of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in nature will provide insights for the improvement of cellulolytic enzyme cocktails used in the biofuels industry. Two families of enzymes, fungal AA9 and bacterial AA10, have recently been characterized as crystalline cellulose or chitin-cleaving lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs). Here we analyze the sequences, structures, and evolution of LPMOs to understand the factors that may influence substrate specificity both within and between these enzyme families. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of sequences, solved structures, and homology models from AA9 and AA10 LPMO families demonstrated that, although these two LPMO families are highly conserved, structurally they have minimal sequence similarity outside the active site residues. Phylogenetic analysis of the AA10 family identified clades with putative chitinolytic and cellulolytic activities. Estimation of the rate of synonymous versus non-synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) within two major AA10 subclades showed distinct selective pressures between putative cellulolytic genes (subclade A) and CBP21-like chitinolytic genes (subclade D). Estimation of site-specific selection demonstrated that changes in the active sites were strongly negatively selected in all subclades. Furthermore, all codons in the subclade D had dN/dS values of less than 0.7, whereas codons in the cellulolytic subclade had dN/dS values of greater than 1.5. Positively selected codons were enriched at sites localized on the surface of the protein adjacent to the active site. CONCLUSIONS: The structural similarity but absence of significant sequence similarity between AA9 and AA10 families suggests that these enzyme families share an ancient ancestral protein. Combined analysis of amino acid sites under Darwinian selection and structural homology modeling identified a subclade of AA10 with diversifying selection at different surfaces, potentially used for cellulose-binding and protein-protein interactions. Together, these data indicate that AA10 LPMOs are under selection to change their function, which may optimize cellulolytic activity. This work provides a phylogenetic basis for identifying and classifying additional cellulolytic or chitinolytic LPMOs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-109) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4144037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41440372014-08-27 Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases Book, Adam J Yennamalli, Ragothaman M Takasuka, Taichi E Currie, Cameron R Phillips, George N Fox, Brian G Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Understanding the diversity of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in nature will provide insights for the improvement of cellulolytic enzyme cocktails used in the biofuels industry. Two families of enzymes, fungal AA9 and bacterial AA10, have recently been characterized as crystalline cellulose or chitin-cleaving lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs). Here we analyze the sequences, structures, and evolution of LPMOs to understand the factors that may influence substrate specificity both within and between these enzyme families. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of sequences, solved structures, and homology models from AA9 and AA10 LPMO families demonstrated that, although these two LPMO families are highly conserved, structurally they have minimal sequence similarity outside the active site residues. Phylogenetic analysis of the AA10 family identified clades with putative chitinolytic and cellulolytic activities. Estimation of the rate of synonymous versus non-synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) within two major AA10 subclades showed distinct selective pressures between putative cellulolytic genes (subclade A) and CBP21-like chitinolytic genes (subclade D). Estimation of site-specific selection demonstrated that changes in the active sites were strongly negatively selected in all subclades. Furthermore, all codons in the subclade D had dN/dS values of less than 0.7, whereas codons in the cellulolytic subclade had dN/dS values of greater than 1.5. Positively selected codons were enriched at sites localized on the surface of the protein adjacent to the active site. CONCLUSIONS: The structural similarity but absence of significant sequence similarity between AA9 and AA10 families suggests that these enzyme families share an ancient ancestral protein. Combined analysis of amino acid sites under Darwinian selection and structural homology modeling identified a subclade of AA10 with diversifying selection at different surfaces, potentially used for cellulose-binding and protein-protein interactions. Together, these data indicate that AA10 LPMOs are under selection to change their function, which may optimize cellulolytic activity. This work provides a phylogenetic basis for identifying and classifying additional cellulolytic or chitinolytic LPMOs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-109) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4144037/ /pubmed/25161697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-109 Text en © Book et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Book, Adam J Yennamalli, Ragothaman M Takasuka, Taichi E Currie, Cameron R Phillips, George N Fox, Brian G Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases |
title | Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases |
title_full | Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases |
title_fullStr | Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases |
title_full_unstemmed | Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases |
title_short | Evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial AA10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases |
title_sort | evolution of substrate specificity in bacterial aa10 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bookadamj evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases AT yennamalliragothamanm evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases AT takasukataichie evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases AT curriecameronr evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases AT phillipsgeorgen evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases AT foxbriang evolutionofsubstratespecificityinbacterialaa10lyticpolysaccharidemonooxygenases |