Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cement and Chitosan-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study
Objective: To do a comparative study of microleakage of glass ionomer cement (GIC) and chitosan modified glass ionomer cement and evaluate which exhibited lesser microleakage. Materials and methods: Sixty freshly extracted sound primary molar teeth were obtained. Two groups of samples were created f...
Autores principales: | Abraham, Deena, Thomas, Abi Mathew, Chopra, Saroj, Koshy, Stephen |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206230 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1225 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
por: Mathew, Sherryl Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparative evaluation of microleakage in conventional glass ionomer cements and triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements
por: Somani, Rani, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Comparative Evaluation of Osteogenic Potential of Conventional Glass-ionomer Cement with Chitosan-modified Glass-ionomer and Bioactive Glass-modified Glass-ionomer Cement An In vitro Study
por: Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement and compomer: An in vitro study
por: Rekha, C. Vishnu, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study
por: Diwanji, Amish, et al.
Publicado: (2014)